2001 Civic Ex (K20A2 Turbo) [Dyno video]
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
2001 Civic Ex (K20A2 Turbo) [Dyno video]
SC61
750cc
K-Pro
251whp @ 8.5psi on a Mustang Dyno
Video is at 15 psi, enjoy.
right click, save as please
http://www.p1auto.com/jack/movies/k20a2turbo.MPG
750cc
K-Pro
251whp @ 8.5psi on a Mustang Dyno
Video is at 15 psi, enjoy.
right click, save as please
http://www.p1auto.com/jack/movies/k20a2turbo.MPG
Trending Topics
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2001 Civic Ex (itr206)
Nice pull, but I have to agree that for 15psi that does sound a little low...esspecially on a K20A2. Arent the GReddy kits getting those kinds of numbers on a stock K20A2 with about half the psi? Never-the-less, nice car. I miss my K20A2 civic.
#12
Re: 2001 Civic Ex (Casey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">251 is on 8.5, i dont think they want to tell #s on 15psi. thats how people are around here haha. plus 251whp on low boost on a mustang dyno is nothing to be ashamed about
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Would he make more power putting it on a Civic Dyno instead of a Mustand Dyno Casey?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Would he make more power putting it on a Civic Dyno instead of a Mustand Dyno Casey?
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: 2001 Civic Ex
Nice pull, but I have to agree that for 15psi that does sound a little low
our dyno is a "LOADING DYNO" not an inertia dyno so the time spent in the pull is much longer...
Arent the GReddy kits getting those kinds of numbers on a stock K20A2
once again, your referring to dynojet numbers..............
good stuff. i bet 1 bar is more in that turbos efficiency range than 8 psi. straight sleeper
our dyno is a "LOADING DYNO" not an inertia dyno so the time spent in the pull is much longer...
Arent the GReddy kits getting those kinds of numbers on a stock K20A2
once again, your referring to dynojet numbers..............
good stuff. i bet 1 bar is more in that turbos efficiency range than 8 psi. straight sleeper
#15
Re: 2001 Civic Ex (Casey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">251 is on 8.5, i dont think they want to tell #s on 15psi. thats how people are around here haha. plus 251whp on low boost on a mustang dyno is nothing to be ashamed about
</TD></TR></TABLE>
damn right, If you ask around you'll get 9000 different estimations of what my car makes, because I tell everybody something different
</TD></TR></TABLE>
damn right, If you ask around you'll get 9000 different estimations of what my car makes, because I tell everybody something different
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 2001 Civic Ex (mildly interesting)
15psi on the SC61 is going to demolish that 8.5 run, so I have no clue what you guys are complaining about power wise. Id put money on it that its over 400whp.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doostur
Honda / Acura
77
06-23-2008 09:05 PM
Doostur
Forced Induction
40
04-29-2008 04:05 AM
B18CXr
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
20
09-24-2004 11:34 AM
93LSivic
Forced Induction
35
10-14-2003 01:34 AM