OK, I have the OG CromePro since it seems like the one that doesn't crash and I don't have to wait on John to reply (I'll probably be dead by the time that happens). I am using the stock NB O2 right now just to verify I am up and going before I go any farther.

Here's what is happening:

Open Crome Pro and I load the file that is in the chip.
Start datalogging.
Everything on the right side of the screen shows correct values for everything; there are no issues there.
When I go to the lambda table (where it's blank to begin with) the trace cell is active and it moves around like it should.

Problem is, the cell is highlighted but there is NO information put in those cells. Any idea WTF is going on?

Ryan

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">OK, I have the OG CromePro since it seems like the one that doesn't crash and I don't have to wait on John to reply (I'll probably be dead by the time that happens). I am using the stock NB O2 right now just to verify I am up and going before I go any farther.

Here's what is happening:

Open Crome Pro and I load the file that is in the chip.
Start datalogging.
Everything on the right side of the screen shows correct values for everything; there are no issues there.
When I go to the lambda table (where it's blank to begin with) the trace cell is active and it moves around like it should.

Problem is, the cell is highlighted but there is NO information put in those cells. Any idea WTF is going on?

Ryan</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ryan,

1. You must set target lamda.
2. You must set paremeters on when you want the system to log the lamda information for auto tuning etc.

Regardless you shouldn't be using that method of tuning.

Good Luck!

 

I planned on using it only for partial throttle; to get the maps nice and smooth. Target Lambda is on the target lambda table; do I need to put that information in the blank table, too?

From my understanding, it's OK to tune partial throttle using this technique, right? I know that WOT should be tuned manually and that is no problem.

Ryan

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I planned on using it only for partial throttle; to get the maps nice and smooth. Target Lambda is on the target lambda table; do I need to put that information in the blank table, too?

From my understanding, it's OK to tune partial throttle using this technique, right? I know that WOT should be tuned manually and that is no problem.

Ryan</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ryan,

If you wanted to use the auto tune system, you will need to setup the target lamda tabels. Do your self a favor & stay away from this method of tuning. In the end you will learn a lot more. (Tune in 2d or 3d mode)

 

I already had the target Lambda tables set. Looks like I forgot to disable my friggin O2 on the chip so that is why it was not showing the numbers.... Yes, I understand how to tune; I was just wondering if this would help you get in the ballpark faster for part throttle. That way, I could just fine tune the partial and tune the WOT.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I already had the target Lambda tables set. Looks like I forgot to disable my friggin O2 on the chip so that is why it was not showing the numbers.... Yes, I understand how to tune; I was just wondering if this would help you get in the ballpark faster for part throttle. That way, I could just fine tune the partial and tune the WOT.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Glad to see you figured it out.