10's possible??
A buddy of mine ran 10.78@123 EG chassis H22 drag car
Hence torque of the H22 matters too.. not only HP!!!!
I've seen cars with good torque numbers run way better times then cars with high PEAK hp. Very true!!!
Hence torque of the H22 matters too.. not only HP!!!!
I've seen cars with good torque numbers run way better times then cars with high PEAK hp. Very true!!!
Trending Topics
you are probably getting a 1.6-1.7 60ft. If you are getting 1.8-1.9 60ft, you are probably losing some topend power. So I'd say this will be the very best unless you are REAR DRIVE.... Very nice time though!!!
I think you can hit 10's
I've seen this guy run, this car is sick. It seemed like he was having launching problems tho i think. Good Luck
(he has a 96-00 style hatch; just helpin ya out ek9turbo)
I've seen this guy run, this car is sick. It seemed like he was having launching problems tho i think. Good Luck
(he has a 96-00 style hatch; just helpin ya out ek9turbo)
I don;t think it is possible at the weight of an EK hatch, unless you REALLY REALLY hook up with a 1.5 60' time but still the MPH is low for 10's IMO. My buddy Freddy who is also local to us here went 10.75@131mph in his CRX with 440whp though. He now makes 515whp but his Crower exhaust cam snapped.
Brian from Millenium went 10.75@136mph in an EG Hatch, Grey from Millenium went 10.92@132mph in a 91 Integra. Shad yours and my tuner went 10.44@144mph in his EG hatch last year, this year his old 99 Si Coupe went 10.9x@140+mph breaking trannies. I went 11.20@132mph, shitty track conditions and slipping clutch.
Good luck, your set up is impressive.
Brian from Millenium went 10.75@136mph in an EG Hatch, Grey from Millenium went 10.92@132mph in a 91 Integra. Shad yours and my tuner went 10.44@144mph in his EG hatch last year, this year his old 99 Si Coupe went 10.9x@140+mph breaking trannies. I went 11.20@132mph, shitty track conditions and slipping clutch.
Good luck, your set up is impressive.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 0
From: Bluffton/Hilton Head,SC / Ft. Lauderdale, FL, usa
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeh it is possible, just have to be driven well and set up right. </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM S1eeper »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think you can hit 10's
I've seen this guy run, this car is sick. It seemed like he was having launching problems tho i think. Good Luck
(he has a 96-00 style hatch; just helpin ya out ek9turbo)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
thanks
and yes if u saw the car running u can tell we launching and traction problems, still spinning half way throug second
I've seen this guy run, this car is sick. It seemed like he was having launching problems tho i think. Good Luck
(he has a 96-00 style hatch; just helpin ya out ek9turbo)
</TD></TR></TABLE>thanks
and yes if u saw the car running u can tell we launching and traction problems, still spinning half way throug second
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nicholashang87 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you are probably getting a 1.6-1.7 60ft. If you are getting 1.8-1.9 60ft, you are probably losing some topend power. So I'd say this will be the very best unless you are REAR DRIVE.... Very nice time though!!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
best 60ft is 1.8
</TD></TR></TABLE>best 60ft is 1.8
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboSmart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">With 400 WHP as in your signature?
B.T.W., how much does your car weigh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
car wieghs 2340lb with out the roll cage so now may be 2420lb empty weight
B.T.W., how much does your car weigh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
car wieghs 2340lb with out the roll cage so now may be 2420lb empty weight
Sorry to discourage you but looking at your short times and your slip, with the power and weight your making its gona be reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeely though to hit a 10.
Are you running a pritty small turbo?
Are you running a pritty small turbo?
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek9turbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">here is the time slip

</TD></TR></TABLE>
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.

</TD></TR></TABLE>
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.</TD></TR></TABLE>
this guy knows what he's talking about...
get them short times covered and 10's are all yours.
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.</TD></TR></TABLE>
this guy knows what he's talking about... get them short times covered and 10's are all yours.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIRep972 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.</TD></TR></TABLE>
After seeing the timeslip, I am seeing your point Chris! With a low 1.6 60' which will save him .2 in the 1/8 and possibly .3-.4 in the 1/4, 10's are there dude! Sugar Cookie teaching you well!
that time slip still has a ton left in it. Get the suspension and slick combo figured out and you should go 1.6's.. If you don't have a scramble hooked up you should hook one up, a 1.6 60' and hitting high boost in 2nd you will probably go 4.6 in the 330'... The rest is just power/gearing and hitting the shifts. It's definitly possible.</TD></TR></TABLE>
After seeing the timeslip, I am seeing your point Chris! With a low 1.6 60' which will save him .2 in the 1/8 and possibly .3-.4 in the 1/4, 10's are there dude! Sugar Cookie teaching you well!
i ll be doing some suspension udjustments, and run less air pressure, spray the intercooler
we were running 11psi in the tires i know we can take it down to 8-9 psi should make a difference
ill be happy if it runs 10.9999999
thanks for the comments guys
we were running 11psi in the tires i know we can take it down to 8-9 psi should make a difference
ill be happy if it runs 10.9999999
thanks for the comments guys
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nicholashang87 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A buddy of mine ran 10.78@123 EG chassis H22 drag car
Hence torque of the H22 matters too.. not only HP!!!!
I've seen cars with good torque numbers run way better times then cars with high PEAK hp. Very true!!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yupper
Hence torque of the H22 matters too.. not only HP!!!!
I've seen cars with good torque numbers run way better times then cars with high PEAK hp. Very true!!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yupper
I've gone 11.01 @ 124 with a touch over 400 hp in a 2550lb street car. The 60' on that run was a mid 1.7. Decent, but I've done better. Stock JDM H22, 14 psi. There's definitely a bit more ET with the power you're making. On a really good run, you can hit a 10 as the car sits right now (hp wise).
Tyler
Tyler




