New
02-19-2008, 10:50 AM
#26
Honda-Tech Member
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes power is power but a N/A car will have Half the HP then that of a fully built turob'd vehicle to run the same times. </TD></TR></TABLE>
My first post is valid according to your post I quoted. Maybe you should double check your posts before submitting to make sure you don't contradict yourself.
My first post is valid according to your post I quoted. Maybe you should double check your posts before submitting to make sure you don't contradict yourself.
02-19-2008, 10:55 AM
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WhiteOnRice)
Maybe you should read the whole thread before posting something stupid and then make yourself look stupid.
It gets old when you keep typing FULLY BUILT in front of N/A and Turbo. I beleive i specifically stated this in my VERY FIRST POST which i see you neglected to read. So with that being said, you have no clue of what we were talking about and automaticlly ASSUMED i was referring to "mildly built" aka bolt ons N/A to a turbo'd vehicle. So again...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wish there was a slap icon so i could just slap you.
Reading > you
100% fail.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jumping in the koolaid and have no clue of what the flavor is.
It gets old when you keep typing FULLY BUILT in front of N/A and Turbo. I beleive i specifically stated this in my VERY FIRST POST which i see you neglected to read. So with that being said, you have no clue of what we were talking about and automaticlly ASSUMED i was referring to "mildly built" aka bolt ons N/A to a turbo'd vehicle. So again...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wish there was a slap icon so i could just slap you.
Reading > you
100% fail.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jumping in the koolaid and have no clue of what the flavor is.
02-19-2008, 11:00 AM
#28
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New owner (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes power is power but a N/A car will have Half the HP then that of a fully built turob'd vehicle to run the same times. Why wouldn't a fully built Turbo'd vehicle weight close to nothing also if it's been put it into a lighter vehicle? There is still no difference.
No according to your "missunderstanding" your car isn't really making 650 whp. I did not say that. "Also it takes half the horsepower for a N/A to run the same times as a boosted car." Yes if they are the same weight but one is built N/A and one is built turbo'd the fully built turbo'd vehicle will have more power to run the same time as a N/A vehicle. What do you think people who drag race, not for fun, but for a living they will have a stock vehicle? seriously, they are going to have a lighter vehicle or put it into something that is lighter then that of what it came in. How many 600 whp N/A vehicles run the same time as a 600whp turbo'd vehicle in the same vehicle? Prolly none because the 600hp N/A will out run the turbo'd vehicle.
On the compression i was talking about. Try to run 200hp on a low compression vs a 200hp high compression vehicle and see who wins. I guarantee you the higher compression will kick the lower compressions *** all day every day, every day all day.
If you still not understanding what i'm saying call up any well known import shop and ask them "How much HP would a fully built N/A vehicle have compared to a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run the same times?"
Before you say "Well if N/A outpowers a turbo'd vehicle then why don't the pro's do it" it's because it's very expensive. Turbo is a cheaper way to go and even the pros have a budget. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I would have to completely disagree. I dont see any 600whp FWD NA 4 bangers anywhere. If you are referring to v8s then we are talking about completely different platforms.
Also on the compression part I disagree. So you are saying that a 200whp type-s will destroy a 200whp base rsx. I would agree but it would be because of the powerband/rev limiter, torque curve and gearing not the hp.
There is a big difference with the weight. In my heavy *** car tops I will see is a 135 mph trap. Where if I were to put it in a lighter car or somehow miraculously shave off 1000 lbs i would run 155mph trap. So yes weight has ALOT to do with it.
No according to your "missunderstanding" your car isn't really making 650 whp. I did not say that. "Also it takes half the horsepower for a N/A to run the same times as a boosted car." Yes if they are the same weight but one is built N/A and one is built turbo'd the fully built turbo'd vehicle will have more power to run the same time as a N/A vehicle. What do you think people who drag race, not for fun, but for a living they will have a stock vehicle? seriously, they are going to have a lighter vehicle or put it into something that is lighter then that of what it came in. How many 600 whp N/A vehicles run the same time as a 600whp turbo'd vehicle in the same vehicle? Prolly none because the 600hp N/A will out run the turbo'd vehicle.
On the compression i was talking about. Try to run 200hp on a low compression vs a 200hp high compression vehicle and see who wins. I guarantee you the higher compression will kick the lower compressions *** all day every day, every day all day.
If you still not understanding what i'm saying call up any well known import shop and ask them "How much HP would a fully built N/A vehicle have compared to a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run the same times?"
Before you say "Well if N/A outpowers a turbo'd vehicle then why don't the pro's do it" it's because it's very expensive. Turbo is a cheaper way to go and even the pros have a budget. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I would have to completely disagree. I dont see any 600whp FWD NA 4 bangers anywhere. If you are referring to v8s then we are talking about completely different platforms.
Also on the compression part I disagree. So you are saying that a 200whp type-s will destroy a 200whp base rsx. I would agree but it would be because of the powerband/rev limiter, torque curve and gearing not the hp.
There is a big difference with the weight. In my heavy *** car tops I will see is a 135 mph trap. Where if I were to put it in a lighter car or somehow miraculously shave off 1000 lbs i would run 155mph trap. So yes weight has ALOT to do with it.
02-19-2008, 11:00 AM
#29
Honda-Tech Member
The fact that your little theory only works for "fully built" cars proves it would not be linear and you have just found one point that 2x boosted = x NA. With that being said, you cannot say you need 2x boosted HP to be as fast as NA.
02-19-2008, 11:03 AM
#30
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New owner (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm saying it may run the same time, around the same time or faster on less HP then that of a turbo'd. So in a sense Yes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Please find me a stock weight Fully built NA rsx that can trap 135mph. I dont care if its a bored and stroked 2.7L but find one and I will shut up and tell you you are right.
I'm saying it may run the same time, around the same time or faster on less HP then that of a turbo'd. So in a sense Yes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Please find me a stock weight Fully built NA rsx that can trap 135mph. I dont care if its a bored and stroked 2.7L but find one and I will shut up and tell you you are right.
02-19-2008, 11:15 AM
#31
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Auburn, AL, usa
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wish there was a slap icon so i could just slap you.
Reading > you
100% fail.</TD></TR></TABLE>
its called the haha
but show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think
I wish there was a slap icon so i could just slap you.
Reading > you
100% fail.</TD></TR></TABLE>
its called the
hahabut show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think
02-19-2008, 11:15 AM
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WhiteOnRice)
Sorry it's not a "theory" i only speak facts and truth. I have yet once on H-T ever said anything about theories i've had or anything relatively close. Everything i have ever posted has been facts. Like i told blueshark call up any well known import shop and ask "How much HP would a fully built N/A have to have in order to run equivalant times to a fully built turbo'd vehicle" I gaurantee you if the shop knows what they are talking about a N/A same car same vehicle 4 cylinder fully built both of them the N/A will destroy the turbo'd vehicle.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.
02-19-2008, 11:16 AM
#33
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SkankyEJ7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkankyEJ7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
its called the haha
but show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm not talking joe shcmoe's **** let alone 650whp on a turbo'd rsx, let me guess blushark you run high 11's if your'e a good driver, 12's mid 12's? I know how heavy the rsx is so i know your barely cutting into the 11's if you know how to drive.
its called the
hahabut show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm not talking joe shcmoe's **** let alone 650whp on a turbo'd rsx, let me guess blushark you run high 11's if your'e a good driver, 12's mid 12's? I know how heavy the rsx is so i know your barely cutting into the 11's if you know how to drive.
02-19-2008, 11:21 AM
#34
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (SkankyEJ7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkankyEJ7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its called the haha
but show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think</TD></TR></TABLE>
First you agree that I'm wrong, then you agree that risk is wrong.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sorry it's not a "theory" i only speak facts and truth. I have yet once on H-T ever said anything about theories i've had or anything relatively close. Everything i have ever posted has been facts. Like i told blueshark call up any well known import shop and ask "How much HP would a fully built N/A have to have in order to run equivalant times to a fully built turbo'd vehicle" I gaurantee you if the shop knows what they are talking about a N/A same car same vehicle 4 cylinder fully built both of them the N/A will destroy the turbo'd vehicle.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree with everything here but I thought you meant 2x boosted HP was needed across the spectra (which is excusable because of that sentence I quoted earlier). No, I didn't read every post but still, that's what you said.
hahabut show me a N/A rsx thats's the in 11's , i mean the fastest rsx ive seen all motor was like RSXslow he ran mid 12's. i new a rsx with any decent turbo and like 15+psi should be able to break into the eleven's id think</TD></TR></TABLE>
First you agree that I'm wrong, then you agree that risk is wrong.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sorry it's not a "theory" i only speak facts and truth. I have yet once on H-T ever said anything about theories i've had or anything relatively close. Everything i have ever posted has been facts. Like i told blueshark call up any well known import shop and ask "How much HP would a fully built N/A have to have in order to run equivalant times to a fully built turbo'd vehicle" I gaurantee you if the shop knows what they are talking about a N/A same car same vehicle 4 cylinder fully built both of them the N/A will destroy the turbo'd vehicle.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree with everything here but I thought you meant 2x boosted HP was needed across the spectra (which is excusable because of that sentence I quoted earlier). No, I didn't read every post but still, that's what you said.
02-19-2008, 11:23 AM
#35
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm not talking joe shcmoe's **** let alone 650whp on a turbo'd rsx, let me guess blushark you run high 11's if your'e a good driver, 12's mid 12's?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have yet to run my car on race gas. It should run a mid-high 10 ~135mph with the weight it is now.
I'm not talking joe shcmoe's **** let alone 650whp on a turbo'd rsx, let me guess blushark you run high 11's if your'e a good driver, 12's mid 12's?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have yet to run my car on race gas. It should run a mid-high 10 ~135mph with the weight it is now.
02-19-2008, 11:25 AM
#36
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sorry it's not a "theory" i only speak facts and truth. I have yet once on H-T ever said anything about theories i've had or anything relatively close. Everything i have ever posted has been facts. Like i told blueshark call up any well known import shop and ask "How much HP would a fully built N/A have to have in order to run equivalant times to a fully built turbo'd vehicle" I gaurantee you if the shop knows what they are talking about a N/A same car same vehicle 4 cylinder fully built both of them the N/A will destroy the turbo'd vehicle.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
As I can see I will not win, but before I give up can you please provide me a timeslip of those two cars and weight.
Fully built ~300whp rsxs are running 12s so are ~300whp turbo rsxs.
It takes roughly lets say for this example same vehicle same driver both being fully built: ~800 for a fully built turbo'd vehicle to run 9's. Now lets look at a fully built N/A it will take ~400hp to run 9's. Now lets put this in the same realm of HP. A fully built N/A 300hp (same car same driver) Vs. a Fully built 300hp turbo'd vehicle(same car same driver) the 300hp N/A will DESTROY all day every day that turbo'd vehicle. This is not theory it's only FACTS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
As I can see I will not win, but before I give up can you please provide me a timeslip of those two cars and weight.
Fully built ~300whp rsxs are running 12s so are ~300whp turbo rsxs.
02-19-2008, 11:28 AM
#38
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blueshark123)
Also if I call any shop that knows what they are doing will laugh at me if I tell them I wanna run a mid 10 sec ~135mph trap NA in my stock weight rsx. OMG I can only imagine.
02-19-2008, 11:31 AM
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blueshark123)
They wouldn't laugh.. they would ask you how deep are your pockets. These rsx's are not light so running 10's Fully built N/A or Turbo'd on close to stock weight is more not likely to happen unless you have deep deep pockets then again the weight plays a huge factor in it.
i bet if you are a good driver with 654whp you may touch 11's May.
i bet if you are a good driver with 654whp you may touch 11's May.
02-19-2008, 11:33 AM
#40
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">And what does it weight? If you're running anything close to 2800 you're not even going to dip into the 10's on 650whp with race gas. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Weighs more than 2800. Ive only had 4 passes down the track I just finished her this Summer. Best I could muster was a 12.6 @ 123 at 460whp and that was with a shitty 2.3 60 foot. 10s are definitely doable with race gas....
Weighs more than 2800. Ive only had 4 passes down the track I just finished her this Summer. Best I could muster was a 12.6 @ 123 at 460whp and that was with a shitty 2.3 60 foot. 10s are definitely doable with race gas....
02-19-2008, 11:34 AM
#41
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Auburn, AL, usa
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WhiteOnRice)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WhiteOnRice »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
First you agree that I'm wrong, then you agree that risk is wrong.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i was showing you there is a emoticon for hitting people not agreeing with you
First you agree that I'm wrong, then you agree that risk is wrong.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i was showing you there is a emoticon for hitting people not agreeing with you
02-19-2008, 11:34 AM
#42
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i bet if you are a good driver with 654whp you may touch 11's May.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wow
i bet if you are a good driver with 654whp you may touch 11's May.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wow
02-19-2008, 11:39 AM
#43
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blueshark123)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blueshark123 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
As I can see I will not win, but before I give up can you please provide me a timeslip of those two cars and weight.
Fully built ~300whp rsxs are running 12s so are ~300whp turbo rsxs. </TD></TR></TABLE> It's fact. I don't need to prove time slips call up a well known shop and just ask "Same car same driver but one is a fully built N/A and the other is fully built turbo'd, How much HP will the fully built turbo'd vehicle have to have in order to run equivalant times" I gaurantee you they will say the N/A will run on less the HP of a turbo'd vehicle to run equivalant times. I'm not talking just an rsx i'm talking a fully built same car same vehicle lets say an EG hatch one being fully built N/A and one being a fully built turbo'd. Fully built N/A will have less the HP then that of a fully built turbo'd.
As I can see I will not win, but before I give up can you please provide me a timeslip of those two cars and weight.
Fully built ~300whp rsxs are running 12s so are ~300whp turbo rsxs. </TD></TR></TABLE> It's fact. I don't need to prove time slips call up a well known shop and just ask "Same car same driver but one is a fully built N/A and the other is fully built turbo'd, How much HP will the fully built turbo'd vehicle have to have in order to run equivalant times" I gaurantee you they will say the N/A will run on less the HP of a turbo'd vehicle to run equivalant times. I'm not talking just an rsx i'm talking a fully built same car same vehicle lets say an EG hatch one being fully built N/A and one being a fully built turbo'd. Fully built N/A will have less the HP then that of a fully built turbo'd.
02-19-2008, 11:41 AM
#45
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> It's fact. I don't need to prove time slips call up a well known shop and just ask "Same car same driver but one is a fully built N/A and the other is fully built turbo'd, How much HP will the fully built turbo'd vehicle have to have in order to run equivalant times" I gaurantee you they will say the N/A will run on less the HP of a turbo'd vehicle to run equivalant times. I'm not talking just an rsx i'm talking a fully built same car same vehicle lets say an EG hatch one being fully built N/A and one being a fully built turbo'd. Fully built N/A will have less the HP then that of a fully built turbo'd.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I will be less but not 50% man. Where did you read this?
I will be less but not 50% man. Where did you read this?
02-19-2008, 11:43 AM
#46
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The car is heavy don't get your hopes up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
With a 1.8 60 foot a mid 11 is doable on pump gas. What makes you think I wouldnt be able to shave off ~.5 seconds with an extra ~200 more hp.
With a 1.8 60 foot a mid 11 is doable on pump gas. What makes you think I wouldnt be able to shave off ~.5 seconds with an extra ~200 more hp.
02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blueshark123)
.5 may seems like a little but when you get into the lower times it is a lot. If you want to run 10's you better pull some weight out that fat bastard.
it's ~50%
but seems relatively close to 50% but non the less an N/A (fully built) will have dramaticlly less the HP then that of a turbo'd (fully built) to run in the lower times 8-11's in the 1/4.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blueshark123 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I will be less but not 50% man. Where did you read this?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't read it i found out by being around a known import shop and a roommate who is a big drag head who used to work for that import shop.
it's ~50%
but seems relatively close to 50% but non the less an N/A (fully built) will have dramaticlly less the HP then that of a turbo'd (fully built) to run in the lower times 8-11's in the 1/4.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blueshark123 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I will be less but not 50% man. Where did you read this?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't read it i found out by being around a known import shop and a roommate who is a big drag head who used to work for that import shop.
02-19-2008, 12:04 PM
#48
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">.5 may seems like a little but when you get into the lower times it is a lot. If you want to run 10's you better pull some weight out that fat bastard.
it's ~50%
but seems relatively close to 50% but non the less an N/A (fully built) will have dramaticlly less the HP then that of a turbo'd (fully built) to run in the lower times 8-11's in the 1/4.
I didn't read it i found out by being around a known import shop and a roommate who is a big drag head who used to work for that import shop.</TD></TR></TABLE>
And 200 hp isnt a small number lol.
I guess we agree to disagree.
it's ~50%
but seems relatively close to 50% but non the less an N/A (fully built) will have dramaticlly less the HP then that of a turbo'd (fully built) to run in the lower times 8-11's in the 1/4.
I didn't read it i found out by being around a known import shop and a roommate who is a big drag head who used to work for that import shop.</TD></TR></TABLE>
And 200 hp isnt a small number lol.
I guess we agree to disagree.
02-19-2008, 12:07 PM
#49
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OFallon, IL
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (blueshark123)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blueshark123 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
And 200 hp isnt a small number lol.
I guess we agree to disagree.</TD></TR></TABLE> 200hp is a small number when that is all your car has.. and it really don't have 200hp. lol i guess we at least agree on something.. to disagree.
And 200 hp isnt a small number lol.
I guess we agree to disagree.</TD></TR></TABLE> 200hp is a small number when that is all your car has.. and it really don't have 200hp. lol i guess we at least agree on something.. to disagree.
02-19-2008, 12:08 PM
#50
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (risktypeS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by risktypeS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 200hp is a small number when that is all your car has.. and it really don't have 200hp. lol i guess we at least agree on something.. to disagree. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was referring to the difference in pump vs race gas
I was referring to the difference in pump vs race gas