SAMCO INTAKE???
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 9,925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (CXtypeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CXtypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">can the samco intake support the weight of a bpi stack and filter without bending???</TD></TR></TABLE>
I doubt it would bend, but it would most likely sag. It would probably be a good idea to make some type of bracket for the intake end of the tube.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by erikiksaz1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm guessing this thing has two benefits, in order of importance: Bling and heat isolation.
Isn't the stock arm pretty adequate in the second department? Hell, it's plastic! </TD></TR></TABLE>
For the most part I think you're right on point. The Samco unit does have a slightly larger inner diameter, will be slightly better for heat dissipation, and also will create slightly less turbulence due to the smoother surface.
I doubt it would bend, but it would most likely sag. It would probably be a good idea to make some type of bracket for the intake end of the tube.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by erikiksaz1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm guessing this thing has two benefits, in order of importance: Bling and heat isolation.
Isn't the stock arm pretty adequate in the second department? Hell, it's plastic! </TD></TR></TABLE>
For the most part I think you're right on point. The Samco unit does have a slightly larger inner diameter, will be slightly better for heat dissipation, and also will create slightly less turbulence due to the smoother surface.
#31
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (migs)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Damnit Clayton. You are condoning to the stupid JDM crowd to bling out their engine bays.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes
Yes
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (CXtypeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CXtypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so its slightly larger than 3"?</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's exactly the same size as the stock unit on both ends, obviously, since it is designed to replace the stock unit – it has a more gradual taper than the stock unit, so the overall volume of the tube is a little bit greater.
Here's my list of feature/benefits:
1) Very pleasing to the eye with your choice of OEM black, stunner Red, and cool blue. If you don't win your next show by putting this part on, then you need to buy new floor mats, or perhaps the matching Samco radiator hose set.
2) The inner surface is slightly smoother than the stock unit - the stock unit has that "flex" section near the filter.
3) As I mentioned above the total volume of the Samco unit is slightly larger. I plan to measure the difference this weekend. I'll post the details. The guys at Samco couldn't give me specifics.
4) In theory the Silicon will do a better job of insulating the air from the engine bay heat. When I get my car back on the road (it's winter here in WI) I'll do some datalogs with Hondata to see if the difference is measurable.
5) The silicon is definitely more robust structurally - it does not bend or flex easily. Not that it would happen on this application but the Samco part is much more resistant to deformation from heat and pressure.
It's exactly the same size as the stock unit on both ends, obviously, since it is designed to replace the stock unit – it has a more gradual taper than the stock unit, so the overall volume of the tube is a little bit greater.
Here's my list of feature/benefits:
1) Very pleasing to the eye with your choice of OEM black, stunner Red, and cool blue. If you don't win your next show by putting this part on, then you need to buy new floor mats, or perhaps the matching Samco radiator hose set.
2) The inner surface is slightly smoother than the stock unit - the stock unit has that "flex" section near the filter.
3) As I mentioned above the total volume of the Samco unit is slightly larger. I plan to measure the difference this weekend. I'll post the details. The guys at Samco couldn't give me specifics.
4) In theory the Silicon will do a better job of insulating the air from the engine bay heat. When I get my car back on the road (it's winter here in WI) I'll do some datalogs with Hondata to see if the difference is measurable.
5) The silicon is definitely more robust structurally - it does not bend or flex easily. Not that it would happen on this application but the Samco part is much more resistant to deformation from heat and pressure.
#34
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Willemstad, Curacao Netherlands Antilles
Posts: 693
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SAMCO INTAKE??? (CXtypeR)
He king,
I have a DC2 JDM ITR 99 with MUGEn intake.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1797524
Can I have this in RED, $119.99 shipped?? Do you take paypal?
I just got my Samco RED hoses from Passwordjdm, would be perfect match.!!
Easy replacement as i can see, let me know if you have in stock, very interested!!!
Rishi
I have a DC2 JDM ITR 99 with MUGEn intake.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1797524
Can I have this in RED, $119.99 shipped?? Do you take paypal?
I just got my Samco RED hoses from Passwordjdm, would be perfect match.!!
Easy replacement as i can see, let me know if you have in stock, very interested!!!
Rishi
#35
Honda-Tech Member
Re: SAMCO INTAKE??? (Rishiras)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rishiras »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He king,
I have a DC2 JDM ITR 99 with MUGEn intake.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1797524
Can I have this in RED, $119.99 shipped?? Do you take paypal?
I just got my Samco RED hoses from Passwordjdm, would be perfect match.!!
Easy replacement as i can see, let me know if you have in stock, very interested!!!
Rishi</TD></TR></TABLE>
Sent you a PM
I have a DC2 JDM ITR 99 with MUGEn intake.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1797524
Can I have this in RED, $119.99 shipped?? Do you take paypal?
I just got my Samco RED hoses from Passwordjdm, would be perfect match.!!
Easy replacement as i can see, let me know if you have in stock, very interested!!!
Rishi</TD></TR></TABLE>
Sent you a PM
#36
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: SAMCO INTAKE??? (Kavehman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kavehman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does King ship internationally ?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i've got 2 packages less than a meter from my left leg which came over the pond from King
i even got some US newspaper material to read
i've got 2 packages less than a meter from my left leg which came over the pond from King
i even got some US newspaper material to read
#37
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: bumper to bumper with AMERIE
Posts: 11,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SAMCO INTAKE??? (tartje)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tartje »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i've got 2 packages less than a meter from my left leg which came over the pond from King
i even got some US newspaper material to read </TD></TR></TABLE>
what's in the boxes?
i even got some US newspaper material to read </TD></TR></TABLE>
what's in the boxes?
#38
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: (CXtypeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CXtypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
now im trying to decide if this is worth it over my aem sri 3"</TD></TR></TABLE>
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe.
now im trying to decide if this is worth it over my aem sri 3"</TD></TR></TABLE>
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe.
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Casey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The inlet side is bigger than 3".
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The inlet side is bigger than 3".
#40
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: (Ausmith)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ausmith »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The inlet side is bigger than 3". </TD></TR></TABLE>
is it big enough to put over the outside diameter of an aem filters' coupling?
The inlet side is bigger than 3". </TD></TR></TABLE>
is it big enough to put over the outside diameter of an aem filters' coupling?
#43
Re: (Casey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Casey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what my bpi stack is for. im thinking it should slip fit inside the samco pipe
its not. youd have to get a 3" pipe to reattach your filter to, since the silicone tube slips over a hard filter inlet, where your aem filster is soft rubber that slips over an aluminum pipe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what my bpi stack is for. im thinking it should slip fit inside the samco pipe
#46
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: too close to Oklahoma
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ausmith)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ausmith »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's a pretty neat part. We've got them available in black...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ah, my question is answered.
Ah, my question is answered.
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (MK Ultra)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MK Ultra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Ah, my question is answered. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep - black, blue, and red.
Ah, my question is answered. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep - black, blue, and red.
#48
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Quezon city, SFDM, Philippines
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ausmith)
is that pic from your eg hatch? was wondering if you could post a pic of the bracket you fabricated to make it fit the eg, tnx
#49
first up, big thanks to the people at King Motorsports; the package was packed nicely and it came in only 7 days (EMS priority), and i live up here in Canadia
i had an AEM CAI prior to this but was unsatisfied with the throttle response so i decided to make the switch to a SRI (if you can call it that). i'll be ordering up a BPI velocity stack to go with the Samco intake arm tomorrow
i'm currently using a generic 3" K&N filter off my AEM CAI. its interesting that the filter fits inside the arm rather than over (like generic CAIs or SRIs)
overall i'm happy that i made the switch because the improvement in throttle response below 4k rpm is very apparent (rev matching in lower engine speeds is a total breeze now), not to mention that it sounds deeper and growlier personally, i couldn't really care less if it makes less power on the dyno, its just a number to me.
i'll update once i receive the BPI stack
i had an AEM CAI prior to this but was unsatisfied with the throttle response so i decided to make the switch to a SRI (if you can call it that). i'll be ordering up a BPI velocity stack to go with the Samco intake arm tomorrow
i'm currently using a generic 3" K&N filter off my AEM CAI. its interesting that the filter fits inside the arm rather than over (like generic CAIs or SRIs)
overall i'm happy that i made the switch because the improvement in throttle response below 4k rpm is very apparent (rev matching in lower engine speeds is a total breeze now), not to mention that it sounds deeper and growlier personally, i couldn't really care less if it makes less power on the dyno, its just a number to me.
i'll update once i receive the BPI stack