KVR "Python" Calipers
I just found this, but was curious if anyone has experience w/ them.
http://www.kvrperformance.com/pythoncaliper.htm
-y
http://www.kvrperformance.com/pythoncaliper.htm
-y
Trending Topics
At least they're the right color!
I like the red! lol
Anodized for me please!
You guys with PY might not need this particular color though...
Here is the reply that I received from KVR Performance:
The caliper has been designed to fit within a stock 14” Honda steel wheel. It has stainless steel pistons, bleeders, bridge bolts, anti rattle clips, it is loaded with street performance pads, wheel spacers, just in case you should need them, and longer wheel studs. It has a 1 year limited warranty against manufacturer defects. The cost is $495.00 each US funds plus freight.
I replied with :
Interesting...this means that since it was designed to fit under the stock Honda steel wheel it is actually a smaller caliper than my car comes with from the factory. As the stock caliper just barely fits under the stock 15” rim of the Type-R. Would there be any benefits for me to use this setup, as it looks like it will be a downgrade as opposed to an upgrade. It is indeed a 4 pot caliper as opposed to the stock 2 pot caliper, but it appears that the pad area has been decreased. Any assistance would be helpful, as there are quite a few Type-R owners that are now looking into this system.
I am awaiting another answer...the price looks good, but the product does not look like something that would be an effective upgrade for the Type-R owners.
Austin
The caliper has been designed to fit within a stock 14” Honda steel wheel. It has stainless steel pistons, bleeders, bridge bolts, anti rattle clips, it is loaded with street performance pads, wheel spacers, just in case you should need them, and longer wheel studs. It has a 1 year limited warranty against manufacturer defects. The cost is $495.00 each US funds plus freight.
Interesting...this means that since it was designed to fit under the stock Honda steel wheel it is actually a smaller caliper than my car comes with from the factory. As the stock caliper just barely fits under the stock 15” rim of the Type-R. Would there be any benefits for me to use this setup, as it looks like it will be a downgrade as opposed to an upgrade. It is indeed a 4 pot caliper as opposed to the stock 2 pot caliper, but it appears that the pad area has been decreased. Any assistance would be helpful, as there are quite a few Type-R owners that are now looking into this system.
I am awaiting another answer...the price looks good, but the product does not look like something that would be an effective upgrade for the Type-R owners.
Austin
They give a different part# for the Type R and CRV. I'm assuming that it's a larger caliper for those applications, but it will be interesting to hear their response. Keep us posted.
These are interesting......But I have my mind set on Fastbrakes 11.75" 4-pot set-up.
These are interesting......But I have my mind set on Fastbrakes 11.75" 4-pot set-up.
There was someone who came into Acura a couple of months back and had some aftermarket 4 pot calipers put on(can't think of the name). However upon inspection by myself, I pointed out to the tech that there was the same if not less pad surface than the stock pads. So doesn't that sound like a phat waste of money for less serface area? Hell they didn't even fit correctly, they had to put like 7 washers in to space out the caliper(minor flaw that could be fixed) So could these 4pots acctually be better?
advantage for 4 pots is for better control, modulation, and feel which uses the total surface area of the pad as opposed to the stock single piston (1 pot) caliper set-up on the ITR. The nsx uses 2 pistons (2 pot) set-up.
Here is there last reply:
Austin, the pads surface is smaller, but the piston area is much larger and this is what determines brake ability. As such this is definately an upgrade.
There you are.
Austin
Austin, the pads surface is smaller, but the piston area is much larger and this is what determines brake ability. As such this is definately an upgrade.
Austin
Here is there last reply:
Austin, the pads surface is smaller, but the piston area is much larger and this is what determines brake ability. As such this is definately an upgrade.
Austin, the pads surface is smaller, but the piston area is much larger and this is what determines brake ability. As such this is definately an upgrade.
Ok here goes my little explanation...take a piece of paper,.... a BIG piece of paper and out ur hand on it and try to move it across the table(this would be symbolic of a stock brake ad with two pots)...now take a SMALLER piece of paper, put both hands on it and tell me if it isnt harder to drag across(sybolic of smaller pad area with 4 pots)...same goes with brakes..one piston exerts less braking torque than two pistons, even if the brake pad area is bigger. thus, more pots and less brake pad area is still better than more brake pad area and less pots.
Ok here goes my little explanation...take a piece of paper,.... a BIG piece of paper and out ur hand on it and try to move it across the table(this would be symbolic of a stock brake ad with two pots)...now take a SMALLER piece of paper, put both hands on it and tell me if it isnt harder to drag across(sybolic of smaller pad area with 4 pots)...same goes with brakes..one piston exerts less braking torque than two pistons, even if the brake pad area is bigger. thus, more pots and less brake pad area is still better than more brake pad area and less pots.
2nd - This analogy is completely bogus! The total piston area (not the number of pistons) of any calliper is going to indicate the amount of force applied to the break pads for a given pedal travel. If the pad sizes were the same then the total amount of force applied to the pads would be constant between a one and four pot calliper. The two key differences in using a four pot over our push pull single pot design are the following:
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure (force/area) to both inside and outside braking surfaces on the rotor.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure over the surface of each pad.
Both these benefits improve breaking performance by reducing hot spots on the pads and promote even pad wear.
One thing to consider is that in a good design the total piston area for the upgraded calliper should be roughly equal to the area of the stock calliper. Changing this area significantly will adjust the break bias and peddle feel considerably.
Regards,
1st - The stock calliper only has ONE pot! Why on earth do people think they have two?
2nd - This analogy is completely bogus! The total piston area (not the number of pistons) of any calliper is going to indicate the amount of force applied to the break pads for a given pedal travel. If the pad sizes were the same then the total amount of force applied to the pads would be constant between a one and four pot calliper. The two key differences in using a four pot over our push pull single pot design are the following:
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure (force/area) to both inside and outside braking surfaces on the rotor.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure over the surface of each pad.
Both these benefits improve breaking performance by reducing hot spots on the pads and promote even pad wear.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure (force/area) to both inside and outside braking surfaces on the rotor.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure over the surface of each pad.
Both these benefits improve breaking performance by reducing hot spots on the pads and promote even pad wear.
2nd - This analogy is completely bogus! The total piston area (not the number of pistons) of any calliper is going to indicate the amount of force applied to the break pads for a given pedal travel. If the pad sizes were the same then the total amount of force applied to the pads would be constant between a one and four pot calliper. The two key differences in using a four pot over our push pull single pot design are the following:
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure (force/area) to both inside and outside braking surfaces on the rotor.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure over the surface of each pad.
Both these benefits improve breaking performance by reducing hot spots on the pads and promote even pad wear.
But on this one I believe i said something similar. One hand covers less service area than two right? and two hands(two pots) would provide more pressure of the surface of the pad right? so im not compeltely BOGUS!
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure (force/area) to both inside and outside braking surfaces on the rotor.
- The four pot calliper will provide even pressure over the surface of each pad.
Both these benefits improve breaking performance by reducing hot spots on the pads and promote even pad wear.
But on this one I believe i said something similar. One hand covers less service area than two right? and two hands(two pots) would provide more pressure of the surface of the pad right? so im not compeltely BOGUS!
In other words each piston has half the surface area! So although you are pushing with more hands, you are now pushing with smaller ones! The total force applied will be the same but it will now be distributed more evenly!
Don't be confused when I say that the pistons are half the area and not 1/4th the area. Apposing pistons in a 4 piston design act as one piston when we are talking about the forces applied. This is because they are pushing against one another. If you can't see this then you will have to try and convince yourself that this is true, because it is!
Regards,
Another thing to keep in mind is that even though a caliper may use a smaller pad (in actual surface area) than another, the actual area of the rotor that is swept by the pad is what makes it more effective. For example, on a 13" rotor, the swept area can be less than that of an 11" rotor, but the 13" rotor will still provide more leverage than the 11" rotor.
As for the 4 piston vs 1 piston, if the piston sizes add up to the same surface area, both calipers will have the same clamping force. The advantage of the multipiston caliper is the smaller pistons react much faster to input either from the rotor surface or the brake pedal. They are much easier to modulate at the point of lockup then a single piston.
Putting a 4 piston caliper on the same rotor as a single piston will allow better control of the rotor, but it won't give you any more leverage.
Better braking can be defined a number of ways, stopping faster is just one measure of that. For street cars that usually means stopping or slowing the car quickly enough to avoid hitting something. On the track it means slowing the car from the top speed to speeds needed to negotiate a corner in the shortest amount of time, and do it with the same feel, etc for the length of the race. Sometimes these two criteria are mutually exclusive, most times they overlap.
One of the hardest things to do is design a system that has to do both things well enough to satisfy the majority of the vehicle drivers.
As for the 4 piston vs 1 piston, if the piston sizes add up to the same surface area, both calipers will have the same clamping force. The advantage of the multipiston caliper is the smaller pistons react much faster to input either from the rotor surface or the brake pedal. They are much easier to modulate at the point of lockup then a single piston.
Putting a 4 piston caliper on the same rotor as a single piston will allow better control of the rotor, but it won't give you any more leverage.
Better braking can be defined a number of ways, stopping faster is just one measure of that. For street cars that usually means stopping or slowing the car quickly enough to avoid hitting something. On the track it means slowing the car from the top speed to speeds needed to negotiate a corner in the shortest amount of time, and do it with the same feel, etc for the length of the race. Sometimes these two criteria are mutually exclusive, most times they overlap.
One of the hardest things to do is design a system that has to do both things well enough to satisfy the majority of the vehicle drivers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









