Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

Sleeper or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 06:37 AM
  #51  
IntEGNYC's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,136
Likes: 3
From: New York, NY, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (RayRay000)

My sleeper

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:27 AM
  #52  
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,073
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (JeremyL)

i never said the cars handled flat out of the box and yes like almost any other car from the factory does have a certain amount of body roll, to say that its excessive is just wrong, try driving a Buick Park Avenue sometime and tell me about body roll

more emphasis should be placed on real handling improvement rather than just minimizing body roll, just because a car doesnt roll doesnt really mean that that by itself makes it a good handling car
No doubt, installing stiffer springs, shocks, and roll bars will definitely cut down on body roll, but if all that is used with stock tires, the car will slide all over the place and handle horribly. You need to upgrade tires AND suspension at the same time to get the most out of each part.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:59 AM
  #53  
BabyBadassIntegraGSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Naples, Florida, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (PatrickGSR94)

i never said the cars handled flat out of the box and yes like almost any other car from the factory does have a certain amount of body roll, to say that its excessive is just wrong, try driving a Buick Park Avenue sometime and tell me about body roll

more emphasis should be placed on real handling improvement rather than just minimizing body roll, just because a car doesnt roll doesnt really mean that that by itself makes it a good handling car

No doubt, installing stiffer springs, shocks, and roll bars will definitely cut down on body roll, but if all that is used with stock tires, the car will slide all over the place and handle horribly. You need to upgrade tires AND suspension at the same time to get the most out of each part.

Not really. If you think about it, aside from people who want to look cool, most people lower their cars to change the handling characteristic of their car(ie-understeer/oversteer) Stock Integras(R aside) all understeer like a pig at the limit. Just by changing the shocks, springs and rear sway, you not only reduce body roll, but you take most if not all, depending on setup, of the understeer out of the car. So now you have a better handling car, but with the same amount of overall grip. This is where tires come in, get what im saying?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:40 AM
  #54  
Jesse H's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (JeremyL)

a stock GSR isnt what i would call a rocket but its a pretty fast car
Eh

Stock GSR's aren't slow, but I wouldn't exactly regard them as 'pretty fast cars' either.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 09:54 AM
  #55  
MrJasey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

do what u want
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:01 AM
  #56  
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,073
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (BabyBadassIntegraGSR)

Not really. If you think about it, aside from people who want to look cool, most people lower their cars to change the handling characteristic of their car(ie-understeer/oversteer) Stock Integras(R aside) all understeer like a pig at the limit. Just by changing the shocks, springs and rear sway, you not only reduce body roll, but you take most if not all, depending on setup, of the understeer out of the car. So now you have a better handling car, but with the same amount of overall grip. This is where tires come in, get what im saying?
well I was talking more from a physics standpoint. With stock suspension, when the car goes through a corner, there is a certain amount of lateral forces (G forces) pushing on the car. Some of these forces are taken in by the suspension (which makes for body roll) and some of it is taken by the tires (overall grip). If you upgrade suspension for less body roll, the suspension is now resisting more of those lateral forces, and so the tires now have to take more of the lateral forces, reducing overall grip. If you upgrade the tires on stock suspension, the tires now resist more of those forces (more overall grip), but now the suspension has to take more of those forces and so the body leans sideways more. If you upgrade all of these things, then all of it resists those forces, so you have less body roll AND increased grip.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:15 AM
  #57  
SleepersOwn's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: From Qnz To Phx
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

i voted to take them off ( what a shocker ), just keep it the clean white, drop it, add tints ( IMO, i hate when ppl look at me ) and your good SLEEPERSOWN ! ! !
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #58  
tC_Dragon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
From: Formerly pdcdragon, CA, US
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (ALLMOTORDC2)

take them off my friend.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #59  
integrx's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca, usa
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

to be a sleeper you must be quiet and fast, look stockish. Are you fast enough? to be considered a sleeper?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #60  
LSVTEC408's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

this is my sleeper?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #61  
nfn15037's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (PatrickGSR94)

Not really. If you think about it, aside from people who want to look cool, most people lower their cars to change the handling characteristic of their car(ie-understeer/oversteer) Stock Integras(R aside) all understeer like a pig at the limit. Just by changing the shocks, springs and rear sway, you not only reduce body roll, but you take most if not all, depending on setup, of the understeer out of the car. So now you have a better handling car, but with the same amount of overall grip. This is where tires come in, get what im saying?

well I was talking more from a physics standpoint. With stock suspension, when the car goes through a corner, there is a certain amount of lateral forces (G forces) pushing on the car. Some of these forces are taken in by the suspension (which makes for body roll) and some of it is taken by the tires (overall grip). If you upgrade suspension for less body roll, the suspension is now resisting more of those lateral forces, and so the tires now have to take more of the lateral forces, reducing overall grip. If you upgrade the tires on stock suspension, the tires now resist more of those forces (more overall grip), but now the suspension has to take more of those forces and so the body leans sideways more. If you upgrade all of these things, then all of it resists those forces, so you have less body roll AND increased grip.
Both are correct, but you can also look at it like this: Upgraded suspension with shitty tires, although it may have a *slight* amount less mechanical grip, will most lilkley produce faster lap times as you will be able to get the car to go where you want it to go. But both are valid points.


[Modified by nfn15037, 2:23 PM 1/14/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #62  
JeremyL's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (LSVTEC408)

doesnt lowering too far adversley effect suspension travel?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #63  
4doorRS5spd's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (JeremyL)

Yes. That's why you don't see too many track cars that have that "so close to the ground that air can't pass underneath look."

However, touring cars and other race cars are that low, but they have extremely well designed suspension set ups.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 05:51 PM
  #64  
Targa250R's Avatar
be professional
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,842
Likes: 13
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (4doorRS5spd)

The reason that car looks so high is because of the tires that are on there. I'm willing to be that those are 195/50-15 size tires, in fact I almost guarantee it. Most people buy the 195/50 size because it's cheaper than the OEM 195/55, but the 195/50s have a shorter sidewall and increase wheel gap, not to mention throw off the speedo/odo.

If you want to take away the "4x4 look," without lowering, I'd suggest to spend a little more and buy the proper tire sizes - 195/55-15 or 205/50-15.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #65  
acatak's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (Targa250R)

The reason that car looks so high is because of the tires that are on there. I'm willing to be that those are 195/50-15 size tires, in fact I almost guarantee it. Most people buy the 195/50 size because it's cheaper than the OEM 195/55, but the 195/50s have a shorter sidewall and increase wheel gap, not to mention throw off the speedo/odo.

If you want to take away the "4x4 look," without lowering, I'd suggest to spend a little more and buy the proper tire sizes - 195/55-15 or 205/50-15.
Actually they are 205/50-15
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 06:41 PM
  #66  
d15dood's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: NorthWest, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

sleeper=no stickers
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:36 PM
  #67  
Got Honda's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: somewhere, us
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (au-gsr)

i would take them off
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 05:23 AM
  #68  
Targa250R's Avatar
be professional
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,842
Likes: 13
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

Actually they are 205/50-15
Well that shoots myy theory all to hell . . .

Are you sure those are 205/50 in that pic? The sidewall is noticeably shorter than my 205/50s . . .

My only suggestion then to take away the "4x4 look" is with an Eibach Pro Kit; it's a pretty mild drop.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #69  
acatak's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (Targa250R)

Im 100% sure they are 205/50-15. I will be lowering it with H&R Sports in the spring.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 11:05 PM
  #70  
teg92's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 1
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

what exactly is under your hood making it a sleeper and not just a stock GSR with a wing?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 05:16 AM
  #71  
integra-modder's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,547
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

I only have the factory emblems on. The VTEC sticker is on my monitor.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 07:33 AM
  #72  
Jesse H's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (teg92)

what exactly is under your hood making it a sleeper and not just a stock GSR with a wing?
thank you. Somebody else who understands the defination of sleeper.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 07:56 AM
  #73  
Civichatch2k's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
From: In Training on Dagobah with Yoda
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

If you took it off yes it may be more sleeper than it is now. But if you like the decals then dont worry about it. Stick with what you like and you cant go wrong!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #74  
d15dood's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: NorthWest, USA
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (acatak)

def. needs to be lowered!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 12:34 PM
  #75  
acatak's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, NH
Default Re: Sleeper or not? (teg92)

Read my sig.... AEM CAI, DC 421 SS header, thermal stealth exhaust, and in about a week my itr cams, skunk 2 cam gears, and b&M FPR will be in.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 AM.