Notices
Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.

GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2015, 06:41 AM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
scrambles2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

I honestly had no idea where to post this question. Just wondering what y'alls opinions were about the GSR's vtec engagement at 4500 rpm and the type r's vtec engagement at, I believe, 5600 rpm. Anyone prefer one over the other. Anyone feel 4500 is to low? Does it help having it kick in lower rather than higher? Anyways just wondering since 4500 to 5600 is quite a gap. Anyways thanks in advance.
Old 10-08-2015, 08:22 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
spAdam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boat on a Hill, CA
Posts: 9,125
Received 618 Likes on 489 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Different cams, different manifolding, different engine = different engagement points. It's not really an opinion issue, it's where the crossover belongs for each engine.
Old 10-08-2015, 11:57 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hondamark35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mustard Belt
Posts: 4,030
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by spAdam
Different cams, different manifolding, different engine = different engagement points. It's not really an opinion issue, it's where the crossover belongs for each engine.
right. and the proof is in the <s>pudding</s> dyno graph.
Old 10-08-2015, 03:07 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
scrambles2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Well I guess is there any benefits of having vtec kick in sooner rather than later is what I'm wondering?
Old 10-08-2015, 03:31 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
spAdam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boat on a Hill, CA
Posts: 9,125
Received 618 Likes on 489 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

The correct answer is "It depends." You may find a little bit of midrange, you may lose a lot. You'll have to put it on a dyno to find out though.
Old 10-09-2015, 06:18 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hondamark35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mustard Belt
Posts: 4,030
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by scrambles2112
Well I guess is there any benefits of having vtec kick in sooner rather than later is what I'm wondering?
Originally Posted by spAdam
The correct answer is "It depends." You may find a little bit of midrange, you may lose a lot. You'll have to put it on a dyno to find out though.
agree.

OP, it's a good question, but you won't find a good answer on the internet. get it on a dyno and see what the numbers say. move the engagement point around until you get as close to a nice flat torque curve as possible. it should be a relatively smooth transition from low cam to high cam.

again, if anyone tells you differently- gives you an answer other than "go to the dyno to find out" ignore them.
Old 10-13-2015, 09:18 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
darrinbrewer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: northeast, tn, usa
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

way back, 13 year ago, I had a gsr, went to a chipped ECU, then added a skunk ITR style intake mani. with the ITR style manifold, and stock vtec at 4400, the car would fall on its face when vtec kicked in, then around 5500, it picked back up.

gotta remember on a gsr, vtec at 4400, with the LONG runners, then at 6000 the short runner opened up. a ITR or skunk2 mani, your on short runners ALL the time.

I found that 5300 was a typical good vtec point for most mild all motor builds that were NOT using a gsr manifold. 6000 was just too long on a wait, the power from the low cam was already falling of at that point.

This was my experience, I street tuned around 100 b series builds on crome, that's what im pullin my information from
Old 10-13-2015, 01:42 PM
  #8  
RTFM
 
v4lu3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 7,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

I will agree with darrinbrewer, a friend of mine had a stock gsr that worked great with stock vtec crossover. when he rebuilt with a pr3 head, pistons, aebs manifold and much better header, plus type-r cams we found that a higher engagement point was needed. Honda did a pretty good job choosing the point based on the stock setup. If you change teh manifold or cams its worth playing with to see what works best...
Old 10-22-2015, 05:47 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
scrambles2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by v4lu3s
I will agree with darrinbrewer, a friend of mine had a stock gsr that worked great with stock vtec crossover. when he rebuilt with a pr3 head, pistons, aebs manifold and much better header, plus type-r cams we found that a higher engagement point was needed. Honda did a pretty good job choosing the point based on the stock setup. If you change teh manifold or cams its worth playing with to see what works best...
Ok that's good to know then because it DEFINITELY will be built. Goal is 500hp so wish me luck
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lDanny
Forced Induction
10
03-10-2005 09:06 AM
hcampsoldier
Forced Induction
29
08-19-2004 07:17 PM
ALLphilthyDC2
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
0
11-09-2003 11:00 PM
gsrallday
Acura Integra
7
11-07-2003 12:14 PM
gsxr
Acura Integra
25
08-28-2001 05:31 AM



Quick Reply: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 PM.