Notices
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002) Includes 1997 - 1999 Acura CL

Does the timing belt really need to be replaced?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2004, 03:08 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
kniob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Does the timing belt really need to be replaced?

I'm on 100,637 miles right now on the car. My father and I are going to replace the timing belt ourselves (he will not have any trouble at all doing it.)

Right now farming season just picked up again, so he doesn't have the time to do it. In a few months he will have the time, but I may have already run another 3,000+ miles on the car.

The question is, is it fine to keep running it like this? Honda wants it replaced at 90,000~, but it hasn't been done. And the honda dealer is charging $472~ to do the belt, I don't have that kind of money.

Another question, everyone whom changed their's around this time, did you have any signs of wear on it? I'm sort of worried about it.

And when we do it, mabye I'll take pictures and do a write up along the way.

Thanks.
Old 05-03-2004, 03:17 PM
  #2  
 
jfastman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (kniob)

I've seen belts that have "looked" ok at your mileage. I guess it kinda depends if the engine has had any oil leaks around the t-belt area, if the engine has ever overheated etc. I think you should at least pop the top cover off and take a peak inside at the belt to check it's condition. I would recommend that you replace the cam, crank and balance shaft seals, tensioner pulleys and the water pump while you are in there. It may sound like alot of extra work and expense, but you will have saved yourself alot of headaches down the road. good luck! pm me if you have any more questions.
Old 05-03-2004, 04:19 PM
  #3  
 
hondawheelwizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunbury, PA, USA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (kniob)

IT SHOULD BE FINE TO REPLACE THE TIMIMG BELT AROUND 105,00 MILES.
WOULDNT HURT TO ADJUST THE VALVES THEN TOO.
Old 05-03-2004, 04:38 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
kniob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (hondawheelwizard)

you don't have to scream
Old 05-03-2004, 04:39 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
RotaryBzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (kniob)

I wouldn't trust it. Get it changed.

<--- he who had a civic t-belt break at 60350.
Old 05-03-2004, 05:46 PM
  #6  
 
FatJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: y0 mamas house, ohhhh points and laughs
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (RotaryBzzzz)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RotaryBzzzz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I wouldn't trust it. Get it changed.

&lt;--- he who had a civic t-belt break at 60350.</TD></TR></TABLE>

redline junky eh?
Old 05-03-2004, 06:07 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
iam7head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 17,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (FatJoe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FatJoe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

redline junky eh? </TD></TR></TABLE>

not necessarily true but "stuff" happens

Better a belt now then a new head and valve assembly later

I am sure there's some car go over 100k without a belt, but the question to ask is that do you wanna to bet your engine on it
Old 05-03-2004, 06:11 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
kniob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (iam7head)

well, I'll pull the upper Timing belt casing off tomorrow morning, and take a look. I could probably just start doing the work now, and just let it take a week or so :/ I can drive the old F150 till then.
Old 05-03-2004, 06:11 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Starrman85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (iam7head)

i'm gettin timing belt and water pump and stuff replaced here in the next month, once school is out in 2 weeks. also need to get my oil seal replaced, because tahts about to go as well.
Old 05-03-2004, 08:17 PM
  #10  
 
PUREVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bismarck, ND, USA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (STARRMAN85)

replace it.. no question.
Old 05-04-2004, 06:41 AM
  #11  
 
Gen_X_Accord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (kniob)

I understand not having the money...that's why I have 203,000 on mine and haven't changed it yet. But don't use my good blessing as a normal example, change it ASAP.
Old 05-04-2004, 06:47 AM
  #12  
 
jfastman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (Gen_X_Accord)

holy crap man! that's like driving a grenade with the pin pulled! i betcha that belt is sooo glazed and cracked! actually, i guess you could make it that long, but it kinda depends on the age of the belt too. i think i saw somewhere that Honda recommends that a t-belt be changed at 60 months iregardless of mileage.
Old 05-04-2004, 06:52 AM
  #13  
Member
 
KGAccord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (jfastman)

you should replace it. the problem is you really don't know when it would break. if it does break chance are it will cost you more than $472 to fix it. if you plan on keeping the car for a more years it's worth it.
Old 05-04-2004, 08:29 AM
  #14  
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (KGAccord)

ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

just fix it.
Old 05-05-2004, 01:00 PM
  #15  
 
maroonaccord2.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced? (kniob)

Spend the $500 now, or the 2K later......pretty simple. Did my 92 lX myself, days worth the work with a good shop manual and the proper tools.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pmiche
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
8
07-21-2021 11:54 PM
major049
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
0
06-11-2019 08:07 AM
2006ser
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
05-11-2011 06:47 PM
dgdarien
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
25
12-31-2009 11:18 AM
_Bug_
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
07-19-2003 01:36 AM



Quick Reply: Does the timing belt really need to be replaced?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.