Alright guys, Here it is. Mind the low end of the chart. Had some small issues with the Software.

Obviously I need to recalabrate my Butt dyno...I thought I was making more power at 5000. It produces less power at crossover but then makes a nice chunk of change above 5700. As you can see there is also some nice low-end increase as well.....HA, it's all about the upper in a 1.6L!

Car is currently at AEM for the next week being test fitted and dyno'ed with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly since the TB is in a different location.

<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT COLOR="red">SKUNK THIS!</FONT></FONT>

Silencer 114.5 and 119.5


No silencer 116 to 121.


Modified by Spade at 12:55 PM 10/20/2003


Modified by Spade at 1:37 PM 10/20/2003

 

nice, i think i might have to buy this manifold

 

How much tuning was involved in these runs? Estimating from the scale on the left, it produced between 2-4 whp gains at various points on the graph, and roughly 2 whp losses at certain others, correct?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How much tuning was involved in these runs? Estimating from the scale on the left, it produced between 2-4 whp gains at various points on the graph, and roughly 2 whp losses at certain others, correct? </TD></TR></TABLE>

No tuning....bolt on and go.

 

Looks like it's really moving power around. Is the loss of 2-3 hp in some areas worth the 2-3 peak HP increase?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wilsel &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks like it's really moving power around. Is the loss of 2-3 hp in some areas worth the 2-3 peak HP increase?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes. It just feels a lot smoother to me.

 

im sure with some tuning you could easily get those dips taken care after crossover

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by coptzer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im sure with some tuning you could easily get those dips taken care after crossover</TD></TR></TABLE>

Stock fuel and ingnition, will not modify the car in anyway shape or form to keep me from passing smog. Completly California Smog legal car.

BTW, it is at AEM for the next week being test fitted with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly.

 

good info spade, as always.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Inigo Montoya &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good info spade, as always.</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Good info SPADE as always!

 

I like how it keeps climbing at the rev limiter where it was maxed out with the stock manifold!

Anyone have a before and after comparison of the Skunk 2 manifold?

 

looking good. what was the numbers before the install?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by O.G triple O.G &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looking good. what was the numbers before the install?</TD></TR></TABLE>

With silencer installed 114.5 before 119.5 after
Without silencer 116 before and 121 after.

 

Loooks good can't wait for the Z6!!!!

 

Stock throttle body? Does edelbrock make any for the D16?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by O.G triple O.G &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what was the numbers before the install?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The before numbers are shown on the graphs.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Civic_95_Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Stock throttle body? Does edelbrock make any for the D16?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes stock TB. Edelbrock makes a 65mm TB for the B that will bolt up however you will have to bore the Intake manfiold another 3mm.

They may make a 62mm TB.

 

i really wanna see the skunk2 vs the edelbrock. well for my use i'd need to see it on boost. oh well. one day when the motor's done if i'm up to it ill dyno my car with stock mani and the skunk2

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Caveman74 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Loooks good can't wait for the Z6!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE> didnt skunk have to increase the fuel pressure on their im to see any gains? i remember hearing that somewhere.

 

yes, believe that they increased it by 5psi. wonder if the same would benefit the edelbrock IM in a n/a setup.

 

It's nice to have others testin' **** out and we all benefit from it.

 

looks good gabe..now build the d16 or at least throw a decent cam in the mix ...I'm sure the TB and intake will easily show more power

 

get a cam, some tuning and a TB...

i want to see waht #s you will hit

 

LOL....dang Spade...this is so cool, everyone wants you to keep researching parts that work for them! can you test out LSD's for me?