Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (SOHC)
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (SOHC)
Alright guys, Here it is. Mind the low end of the chart. Had some small issues with the Software.
Obviously I need to recalabrate my Butt dyno...I thought I was making more power at 5000. It produces less power at crossover but then makes a nice chunk of change above 5700. As you can see there is also some nice low-end increase as well.....HA, it's all about the upper in a 1.6L!
Car is currently at AEM for the next week being test fitted and dyno'ed with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly since the TB is in a different location.
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT COLOR="red">SKUNK THIS!</FONT></FONT>
Silencer 114.5 and 119.5
No silencer 116 to 121.
Modified by Spade at 12:55 PM 10/20/2003
Modified by Spade at 1:37 PM 10/20/2003
Obviously I need to recalabrate my Butt dyno...I thought I was making more power at 5000. It produces less power at crossover but then makes a nice chunk of change above 5700. As you can see there is also some nice low-end increase as well.....HA, it's all about the upper in a 1.6L!
Car is currently at AEM for the next week being test fitted and dyno'ed with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly since the TB is in a different location.
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT COLOR="red">SKUNK THIS!</FONT></FONT>
Silencer 114.5 and 119.5
No silencer 116 to 121.
Modified by Spade at 12:55 PM 10/20/2003
Modified by Spade at 1:37 PM 10/20/2003
#3
Darth ModerVader
Re: Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (Spade)
How much tuning was involved in these runs? Estimating from the scale on the left, it produced between 2-4 whp gains at various points on the graph, and roughly 2 whp losses at certain others, correct?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (Padawan)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How much tuning was involved in these runs? Estimating from the scale on the left, it produced between 2-4 whp gains at various points on the graph, and roughly 2 whp losses at certain others, correct? </TD></TR></TABLE>
No tuning....bolt on and go.
No tuning....bolt on and go.
#5
Member
Re: Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (Padawan)
Looks like it's really moving power around. Is the loss of 2-3 hp in some areas worth the 2-3 peak HP increase?
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (wilsel)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wilsel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looks like it's really moving power around. Is the loss of 2-3 hp in some areas worth the 2-3 peak HP increase?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes. It just feels a lot smoother to me.
Yes. It just feels a lot smoother to me.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (coptzer)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by coptzer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im sure with some tuning you could easily get those dips taken care after crossover</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock fuel and ingnition, will not modify the car in anyway shape or form to keep me from passing smog. Completly California Smog legal car.
BTW, it is at AEM for the next week being test fitted with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly.
Stock fuel and ingnition, will not modify the car in anyway shape or form to keep me from passing smog. Completly California Smog legal car.
BTW, it is at AEM for the next week being test fitted with many CAIs and Short rams to see what makes the best power. And how to mount it properly.
#10
Re: (Inigo Montoya)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Inigo Montoya »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good info spade, as always.</TD></TR></TABLE>
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (jwn7)
I like how it keeps climbing at the rev limiter where it was maxed out with the stock manifold!
Anyone have a before and after comparison of the Skunk 2 manifold?
Anyone have a before and after comparison of the Skunk 2 manifold?
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (O.G triple O.G)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by O.G triple O.G »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looking good. what was the numbers before the install?</TD></TR></TABLE>
With silencer installed 114.5 before 119.5 after
Without silencer 116 before and 121 after.
With silencer installed 114.5 before 119.5 after
Without silencer 116 before and 121 after.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (O.G triple O.G)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by O.G triple O.G »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what was the numbers before the install?</TD></TR></TABLE>
The before numbers are shown on the graphs.
The before numbers are shown on the graphs.
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: (Civic_95_Si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Civic_95_Si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Stock throttle body? Does edelbrock make any for the D16?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes stock TB. Edelbrock makes a 65mm TB for the B that will bolt up however you will have to bore the Intake manfiold another 3mm.
They may make a 62mm TB.
Yes stock TB. Edelbrock makes a 65mm TB for the B that will bolt up however you will have to bore the Intake manfiold another 3mm.
They may make a 62mm TB.
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Spade)
i really wanna see the skunk2 vs the edelbrock. well for my use i'd need to see it on boost. oh well. one day when the motor's done if i'm up to it ill dyno my car with stock mani and the skunk2
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Re: (Caveman74)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Caveman74 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Loooks good can't wait for the Z6!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE> didnt skunk have to increase the fuel pressure on their im to see any gains? i remember hearing that somewhere.
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SO.CALI
Posts: 3,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edelbrock Performer X intake manifold Dyno'd (Spade)
looks good gabe..now build the d16 or at least throw a decent cam in the mix ...I'm sure the TB and intake will easily show more power