239 whp/ 169 lb-ft Dyno
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
This graph is of a 84x87.2 B series, B16 ported head, AEBS IM, 12.5 CR, 70mm TB, JDM header and 2.25 exhaust.

Now with B19 1 piece coated header, 2-1/2" exhaust and Prototype Racing velocity stack.

Now with B19 1 piece coated header, 2-1/2" exhaust and Prototype Racing velocity stack.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSR4U2NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what cam was used in this motor?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mohsin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice numbers but doesn't church's read 10% higher than other dyno's..</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes it does BUT when you are showing gains from one setup to the next and it was done on the same dyno, you are looking at the gains , not the overall #'s
Look how much the header and intake picked up..thats insane..(but i knew about the smsp secret for years now, I run one
)
Yes it does BUT when you are showing gains from one setup to the next and it was done on the same dyno, you are looking at the gains , not the overall #'s
Look how much the header and intake picked up..thats insane..(but i knew about the smsp secret for years now, I run one
)
so first that 1.9L engine was sucking air through a filter, and trying to exit exhaust through a jdm itr header and 2.25 exhaust..
now you took off the filter, put on the prototype velocity stack with no filter, and put on your header with a 2.5 exhaust..
with tuning, gains seem about right.
now you took off the filter, put on the prototype velocity stack with no filter, and put on your header with a 2.5 exhaust..
with tuning, gains seem about right.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSR4U2NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what cam was used in this motor?</TD></TR></TABLE>
S2S2 cams
They were a year apart but both done at Church's so I assume it's the same dynapack just at different locations.
Same engine, no refreshing that I know of.
I assume there was a filter on the PR velocity stack, but I'll check and get back to ya.
S2S2 cams
They were a year apart but both done at Church's so I assume it's the same dynapack just at different locations.
Same engine, no refreshing that I know of.
I assume there was a filter on the PR velocity stack, but I'll check and get back to ya.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JakeIsCool »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why cant we ever get dyno numbers on a stock motor compared to stock with aftermarket header.</TD></TR></TABLE>
because alot of people don't wanna waste money dynoing when all they have is an aftermarket header on a stock motor LOL
but..there probably has been a couple..just gotta search..or maybe start your own thread asking for it.
because alot of people don't wanna waste money dynoing when all they have is an aftermarket header on a stock motor LOL
but..there probably has been a couple..just gotta search..or maybe start your own thread asking for it.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EVOL »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so first that 1.9L engine was sucking air through a filter, and trying to exit exhaust through a jdm itr header and 2.25 exhaust..
now you took off the filter, put on the prototype velocity stack with no filter, and put on your header with a 2.5 exhaust..
with tuning, gains seem about right.</TD></TR></TABLE>
OK, just got word back from my customer.
So adding the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust to the engine that was already running the ITR snorkle jumped the numbers from 208 whp to 233 whp. The unfiltered prototype racing velocity stack netted an additional 6 whp to 239 whp as shown in the above graph.
So the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust only increased power by 25 whp and not the 31 whp as shown in the graph.
now you took off the filter, put on the prototype velocity stack with no filter, and put on your header with a 2.5 exhaust..
with tuning, gains seem about right.</TD></TR></TABLE>
OK, just got word back from my customer.
So adding the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust to the engine that was already running the ITR snorkle jumped the numbers from 208 whp to 233 whp. The unfiltered prototype racing velocity stack netted an additional 6 whp to 239 whp as shown in the above graph.
So the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust only increased power by 25 whp and not the 31 whp as shown in the graph.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SMSP »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
OK, just got word back from my customer.
So adding the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust to the engine that was already running the ITR snorkle jumped the numbers from 208 whp to 233 whp. The unfiltered prototype racing velocity stack netted an additional 6 whp to 239 whp as shown in the above graph.
So the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust only increased power by 25 whp and not the 31 whp as shown in the graph. </TD></TR></TABLE>
25 whp is a very impressive gain
OK, just got word back from my customer.
So adding the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust to the engine that was already running the ITR snorkle jumped the numbers from 208 whp to 233 whp. The unfiltered prototype racing velocity stack netted an additional 6 whp to 239 whp as shown in the above graph.
So the B19 header and 2-1/2" exhaust only increased power by 25 whp and not the 31 whp as shown in the graph. </TD></TR></TABLE>
25 whp is a very impressive gain





