All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #1  
Team 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison.

We just dyno'd the new Civic Si yesterday, and here are the results.




Here is a comparison with an '04 RSX-S.




Both of these cars are stock. Honda has done a better job of programming the new Si's K series, but that VTEC crossover is VERY pronounced to say the least. Still, the car makes great power for stock, and should be easy to extract more from.

Thoughts?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #2  
Mohsin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Dark and Scary
Default

damn, the TQ looks v.consistent. i can imagine how it will react to even basic mods
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
EJ1 wilcox's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: (Mohsin)

More power than the RSX-S!

Sounds good to me! I bet sales of the RSX are going to suffer. Although I do like the styling of the RSX better than the new Si.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #4  
Team 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default Re: (EJ1 wilcox)

Different markets though (from Honda's standpoint.)

I could picture my Dad driving an RSX.
He'd be confused by the new Si.

I was very impressed by the fit and finish as well.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #5  
StRoKeD-B16bEj2's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
From: Breakin yall off in the 310, United States
Default Re: (Team 4)

i wont be suprised if Acura comes out with another USDM ITR since the civic Si has more power and LSD Tranny
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #6  
dohcMONSTER's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
From: feed us
Default Re: (BLaCkMaNEg6)

cant wait for bolt ons and K-Pro
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #7  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: (dohcMONSTER)

Hell yeah, those new Si's are sooo bad!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:41 AM
  #8  
Pondus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Molde, Norway
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Team 4)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Team 4 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">but that VTEC crossover is VERY pronounced to say the least.

Thoughts?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yep, I believe they do this on purpose so all the ricers out there get to feel the mAD vTak.

It probably would be much more effective with a VTEC x-over around 5k, but then no one would notice it and that's bad for sales.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:17 AM
  #9  
BERT-O's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,802
Likes: 2
From: FL, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Team 4)


Cool


The pondering question I have is that who bought all 15 complete SI heads from Honda in the past few weeks? Before American Honda realizes that they were selling it dirt cheap. Before Dec 12, it was retailing for $708.85 or wholesale price of $531.64 (now think about the dealer cost?)#10003-RRB-A00
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 06:33 AM
  #10  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (BERT-O)

Does the 04 rsx still have the k20a2 though!? Or was that the first year of the switch?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 07:56 AM
  #11  
JBONES's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: westerville, ohio, usa
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (BERT-O)

Yeah it was $460.75 dealer cost...Know honda has a dealer cost of $1088.33...Know thats a jump....i show there might still be a couple heads floating around out there in honda world.

Still waiting on my civic si to come in. Hopefully soon!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #12  
ClimaxCRX's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Used2beAb16)

I think those new Si's, they look nice and they make good power. The only problem I see is the weight. I think they weigh like 2950lbs or something.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #13  
young noob's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
From: va, va, us
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (ClimaxCRX)

sorry
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #14  
MJ23FE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: I taint rich, NJ, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Team 4)

K20A2 02-04 RSX Type-S
K20Z3 06+ Civic Si
With the old SAE ratings, the 02-04 Type S was rated at 200hp & the 05+ Type S was rated at 210hp.
With the new SAE ratings, the 05+ Type S is rated at 201hp & the 06 Si, which also uses the new SAE rating, is rated at 197hp.

So if we were using the old SAE Ratings right now, would the 06 Si be rated at 206hp???
::shurg::

-Jalal
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #15  
Team 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (young noob)

They are heavy, but I think there may be a cure for that.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #16  
D-Rob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 2
From: Carlisle, PA, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Team 4)

2877 lbs.

My father just ordered his 2006 Si on Monday.

On another note, is it just me, or does that VTEC engagement point need moved down a few hundred RPM? I mean, yeah, I suppose Honda designed it that way to make VTEC more of a 'kick,' but I've always been taught that a smooth changeover is considered 'correct' amongst tuners.

It also appears that the power on the low cam seems to be levelling off right before engagement. This looks similar to my father's 2004 S2000. It turned out his factory crossover point was 400 RPM too high straight from the factory.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #17  
MJ23FE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: I taint rich, NJ, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (D-Rob)

Nothing some K-Pro cant fix.
This thing will be fun to drive with CAI/Race Header/2.5"+ exhaust /K-Pro.
-Jalal
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #18  
D-Rob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 2
From: Carlisle, PA, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (MJ23FE)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MJ23FE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nothing some K-Pro cant fix.
This thing will be fun to drive with CAI/Race Header/2.5"+ exhaust /K-Pro.
-Jalal</TD></TR></TABLE>

Exactly what I'm thinking.

Looks like I'll be pricing K-Pro.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #19  
projectTeG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,421
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fl
Default

whats the new 05 rsx-s dyno look like? lol, i think that would give the new si a run

dont think its a far comparison.,...lol


Modified by projectTeG at 2:45 AM 12/22/2005
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
MJ23FE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: I taint rich, NJ, USA
Default Re: (projectTeG)



-Jalal
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #21  
projectTeG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,421
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fl
Default Re: (MJ23FE)

pic no work^^^^
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #22  
Team 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default Re: (projectTeG)

The only dyno we had was of an '05 RSX with an intake, and it made more power than the new Si. If that new Si had an intake, it might be a different story.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #23  
93turbo16's Avatar
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 3
From: Carlisle, Pa, USA
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (D-Rob)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D-Rob &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2877 lbs.

My father just ordered his 2006 Si on Monday.

On another note, is it just me, or does that VTEC engagement point need moved down a few hundred RPM? I mean, yeah, I suppose Honda designed it that way to make VTEC more of a 'kick,' but I've always been taught that a smooth changeover is considered 'correct' amongst tuners.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Vtec crossover on my K20 is 4500 and it is very smooth. It looses power if you engage it any further up in the RPM, but that is also with messing with the VTC. They can definitley benefit from being moved down. I think AEMs basemap came with vtec at 3500
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #24  
Team 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (93turbo16)

There is power in the new Si by leaning it out as well. It's not nearly as rich as the K20A2, but is still warranty safe.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #25  
StRoKeD-B16bEj2's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
From: Breakin yall off in the 310, United States
Default Re: The new Civic Si dyno chart and comparison. (Team 4)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Team 4 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They are heavy, but I think there may be a cure for that.</TD></TR></TABLE>

dont forget they have a LSD tranny, RSX-S does not
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.