Honda MTF vs. GM Syncromesh
I've used synthetic mobil 1 in my tranny for 1000 miles and learned synthetic doesnt allow the friction for the synchros to work in the way they're designed (which explains my very rough shifting), but Honda MTF is cheaper than GM Syncromesh is there a big difference between the two?
ive heard about this alot from the ef guys. one guy trying both the honda mtf and the gm stuff and he said the the gm stuff worked better
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
i'd use honda MTF in a honda transmission.
not that SM doesn't make for smooth shifts or whatever, but the oil is too thin to protect the transmission over the course of tens of thousands of miles. if tranny longevity is your priority, stick with the honda mtf.
not that SM doesn't make for smooth shifts or whatever, but the oil is too thin to protect the transmission over the course of tens of thousands of miles. if tranny longevity is your priority, stick with the honda mtf.
Agreed. GM sm, from what I gather, is something you use when your tranny is already f'd up and you're just trying to make it feel better.
I used to always have to shift into second before shifting into first. I replaced the Honda MTF, and now I never have to do that, it just goes into first easily.
I used to always have to shift into second before shifting into first. I replaced the Honda MTF, and now I never have to do that, it just goes into first easily.
Penzoil makes GM syncromesh. You can get the penzoil version (same as the non-friction modified version) at autozone or whatever for usually 6 dollars a quart. That is a bit better than the 10$+ for the GM version.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EK9-Stealth »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">GM syncromesh
If you read on the back of the GM it says "it will not break down" Like butter</TD></TR></TABLE>
thermal breakdown isn't so much the issue as the fact that the fluid is too thin to begin with.
and, personally i don't believe that it "won't break down." all lubricants will break down over time...especially in a tranmission, where it is subjected to heat and shear.
If you read on the back of the GM it says "it will not break down" Like butter</TD></TR></TABLE>thermal breakdown isn't so much the issue as the fact that the fluid is too thin to begin with.
and, personally i don't believe that it "won't break down." all lubricants will break down over time...especially in a tranmission, where it is subjected to heat and shear.
Trending Topics
Don't mix fluids.
IMO, you should stick w/ a Honda MTF fluid until your tranny gets some miles on it and starts to shift bad and grind. THEN the Syncromesh will shine.
If you're having trouble w/ grinds, give the Syncromesh a shot; it helped mine tremendously.
IMO, you should stick w/ a Honda MTF fluid until your tranny gets some miles on it and starts to shift bad and grind. THEN the Syncromesh will shine.
If you're having trouble w/ grinds, give the Syncromesh a shot; it helped mine tremendously.
I've been running the gm synchromesh for awhile
the guys at gm told me you dont wanna mix that stuff at all. This has been covered , many people on HT have made the switch from honda mtf to the gm fluid with excellent results.
the guys at gm told me you dont wanna mix that stuff at all. This has been covered , many people on HT have made the switch from honda mtf to the gm fluid with excellent results.
ANYONE EVER TRIED THE ROYAL PURPLE SYNCHROMESH? IM ABOUT TO PUT AN EXEDY STAGE 2 RACING CLUTCH AND FLYWHEEL IN MY CABLE TRANNY (FOR A 1ST GEN B16) AND IM TRYING TO DECIDE WHETHER I SHOULD USE THE HONDA MTF OR TRY THE ROYAL PURPLE SYNCHROMESH? OH YEAH, MY TRANNY DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE ANY PROBLEMS, I.E.: GRINDS, ROUGH SHIFTS, ETC.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">honda MTF
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The new Honda mtf is too thin. It's good while it's cold, but once it's warmed up it becomes notchy. I've heard it doesn't do well on track days either, probably because it shears from being to thin. For mtf, I'd go with either Redline or Amsoil.
</TD></TR></TABLE>The new Honda mtf is too thin. It's good while it's cold, but once it's warmed up it becomes notchy. I've heard it doesn't do well on track days either, probably because it shears from being to thin. For mtf, I'd go with either Redline or Amsoil.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">honda MTF </TD></TR></TABLE>
+2
+2
just remembered something...
with royal purple syncromax and redline my gears were blue which meant there was too much heat....with the honda MTF i didnt have that problem...actually come to think about it, i havent had to rebuild my tranny since i switched!
oh yeah...i run Quaife lsd....but if you have something like a KAAZ lsd then you have to run their fluid which is just GL5/80-90 but with additive....but yeah thats a whole other thing.
Modified by BlacktraxGirl at 6:18 PM 7/17/2008
with royal purple syncromax and redline my gears were blue which meant there was too much heat....with the honda MTF i didnt have that problem...actually come to think about it, i havent had to rebuild my tranny since i switched!
oh yeah...i run Quaife lsd....but if you have something like a KAAZ lsd then you have to run their fluid which is just GL5/80-90 but with additive....but yeah thats a whole other thing.
Modified by BlacktraxGirl at 6:18 PM 7/17/2008



thanks 4 all the input people, i appreciate it