More pics and info: http://www.ITRspec.com

Special thanks to Intec Racing for providing the dyno time, and Chris (racerboyb18c1) for his aid!

 

very nice! especially considering the "mild cams".

 

what did u tune it with? did u have your own wideband? was the dyno shops wideband off a bit cuz ur run n pretty lean imo. 14:1 aint too safe

go back to the shop where u dyno'd the car and change the settings to SAE smoothing 5 and come back with the results. the numbers will be lower by about 5 whp, but pretty impressive still

 

Why ITR cams?? Class rules?

 

I have all the viewer files on my laptop and the WinPEP software, let me know if you want any other settings.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted k20 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what did u tune it with? did u have your own wideband? was the dyno shops wideband off a bit cuz ur run n pretty lean imo. 14:1 aint too safe</TD></TR></TABLE>

Actual O2 numbers were 13.2-13.5, the tailpipe sniffer was reading about .7-.8 leaner.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why ITR cams?? Class rules? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Had them from my C5, havn't decided what cams yet, but I got an idea...

 

<FONT COLOR="royalblue"> Good Stuff Marsh! </FONT>

 

Looking good dude. Your final drive + 2.0l TQ makes the ITR feel about 300lbs lighter.

I still think this engine should be in a **** box EF hatch. haha

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by leed &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Looking good dude. Your final drive + 2.0l TQ makes the ITR feel about 300lbs lighter.

I still think this engine should be in a **** box EF hatch. haha
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ya you would, although that would be a fun toy.

Forgot to add Dave to the thank you list! He provided excellent tuning services. BTW I have a nice couch now, you should come down and street tune my whip, I have a full assortment of beer.

 

nice numbers. see what it runs

 

very good numbers
keep us updated when the cams change!

 

the car feels really strong cant wait to throw in some cams and a portd head stay tunned for alot more ....

 

Very impressive for a 1.8 and the mods listed.

 

85mm is not a 1.8, very nice number btw

 

what cams are you going to go with?

 

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by allmotorteg_96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what cams are you going to go with?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Waiting on the Skunk2 Pro3's. I may end up with the Pro2's if the 3's look too big. I also have a set of BC5's at my disposal to mess with, might do a mini cam comparison soon. Anyone have a set of cams they want tested?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> </TD></TR></TABLE>

Thanks. I also have my DIY 'Busa ITB's to go on soon also.

 

The Skunk Pro 3's are gonna be too big for that motor, and I don't even know if Skunk is gonna sell them to the general public. The Pro 2's may even be to large, check out the BC5's and see what happens, I would be intrested to see if those may be to large also..

 

nice numbers guy! what header was used? intake mani? mang.?

 

nvm...my damn 56k didnt load fast enough to show the list lol...what mani though? and tb?

 

Damn looking good for just ITR cams. Once you get some real cams in there, you gonna be making some real big power.

 

Skunk2 Pro1s or Pro2s
or
M22XX

those would be my choices

good numbers

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92TypeR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Waiting on the Skunk2 Pro3's. I may end up with the Pro2's if the 3's look too big. I also have a set of BC5's at my disposal to mess with, might do a mini cam comparison soon. Anyone have a set of cams they want tested?

Thanks. I also have my DIY 'Busa ITB's to go on soon also.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

<FONT COLOR="royalblue"> Where does he get those wonderful toys? </FONT>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sheepey &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nvm...my damn 56k didnt load fast enough to show the list lol...what mani though? and tb?</TD></TR></TABLE>

All stock ITR stuff.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VtecKiDD &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Skunk2 Pro1s or Pro2s
or
M22XX

those would be my choices

good numbers</TD></TR></TABLE>

Don't know much about the M22XX. The Pro2's look to be the most "ideal" cam for my setup in terms of midrange and good topend, however the Pro3's might be more ideal with the ITB's seeing as it is good to overcam the ITB's so they have more air to scavenge. We'll see. Like I said, I have access to a dyno and a couple different cam selections, so I may just do a comparison and choose the best

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crx=si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">85mm is not a 1.8, very nice number btw </TD></TR></TABLE>Ok.

 

THIS MOTOR ISNT THE MOST AGGRESSIVE BUT IT IS A GOOD MOTOR FOR THESE KINDA CAM CHOICES DUE TO THE SMALLER DOMES , WE CAN REALLY GET IN THERE AND SEE WHAT WILL REALLY WORK BEST ON THIS SETUP , IF WE CAN GET 240 WHP ILL BE HAPPY ANY LESS THEN I GUESS ILL BE UP LATE FIGUIRING IT OUT