B20VTEC, 230 whp / 151 tq
Today I heard my new engine in VTEC for the first time and what a nice feeling that was. Me and a few friends had rent a mobile dyno to tune all day. We made a pretty good map for it but there is still some more tuning to be seen. A/F is around 12.9:1. Even though it made 230 whp and 203.8 Nm = 151 lbs/tq on 215/40-16" tires.
It might have put even more out but we did want to go over 9400 RPM. All day long it made this strange drop right after it peaked so I don't know if the tires spin or it's a software problem. But damn this **** pulls like there is no tomorrow....

Setup and build can be found here: https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251387
Modified by CRXEE8 at 2:28 AM 6/6/2005
It might have put even more out but we did want to go over 9400 RPM. All day long it made this strange drop right after it peaked so I don't know if the tires spin or it's a software problem. But damn this **** pulls like there is no tomorrow....


Setup and build can be found here: https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251387
Modified by CRXEE8 at 2:28 AM 6/6/2005
B20B3 block with JITA sleeves bored to 84.5 mm.
IB Spec Wiseco 3.6 cc dome pistons
Probe Ultra Light rods
RPM Service 72 mm. TB
JG Sheetmetal IM
3" CAI with 6" velocity stack
RLZ Stage3 B16A2 head
IB Spec cams
IB Spec valvetrain
IB Spec exhaust valves
Omni intake valves
SMSP B20VTEC header
3" Carsound cat
3" Thermal cat back
Hondata S200
Compression around 12.3:1
IB Spec Wiseco 3.6 cc dome pistons
Probe Ultra Light rods
RPM Service 72 mm. TB
JG Sheetmetal IM
3" CAI with 6" velocity stack
RLZ Stage3 B16A2 head
IB Spec cams
IB Spec valvetrain
IB Spec exhaust valves
Omni intake valves
SMSP B20VTEC header
3" Carsound cat
3" Thermal cat back
Hondata S200
Compression around 12.3:1
Trending Topics
giid HP but i think the TQ is alittle low, in my 84mm bore with 89mm stroke i had 160 ft tq and that was only a base tune so far with 11.1 cr
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jason bouchard »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">giid HP but i think the TQ is alittle low, in my 84mm bore with 89mm stroke i had 160 ft tq and that was only a base tune so far with 11.1 cr </TD></TR></TABLE>
i bet u have rmf header they seem to get free 10lbs tq
i bet u have rmf header they seem to get free 10lbs tq
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MAX_CFM »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i bet u have rmf header they seem to get free 10lbs tq</TD></TR></TABLE>
Must be why his headers seem to make cars faster, even if they happen to LOSE power. The dyno doesn't always tell the whole story guys. The true test is whether it is faster on the track. Which is why Randy's headers are on some of the fastest cars in the world.
Must be why his headers seem to make cars faster, even if they happen to LOSE power. The dyno doesn't always tell the whole story guys. The true test is whether it is faster on the track. Which is why Randy's headers are on some of the fastest cars in the world.
congrats on the nice result
yes it was a very good day and some damn good numbers we pulled out of it.
Tbone: I used Todd's (b19coupe) bin as a base .But had to modify it quite a bit. It's not perfectly tuned yet,but we ran out of time.
yes it was a very good day and some damn good numbers we pulled out of it. Tbone: I used Todd's (b19coupe) bin as a base .But had to modify it quite a bit. It's not perfectly tuned yet,but we ran out of time.
Here are two vids from last night... I will try and get some street action today
http://www.honda-klub.dk/vis.p...f52fa
http://www.honda-klub.dk/vis.p...9c801
http://www.honda-klub.dk/vis.p...f52fa
http://www.honda-klub.dk/vis.p...9c801
you can't really compare dyno figures like that, particularly between different makes and models of dynos. don't forget that gearing will dramatically change the torque reading too.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rochesterricer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Must be why his headers seem to make cars faster, even if they happen to LOSE power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
does this even make any sense?
does this even make any sense?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by allmotordc2integ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is that a/f on a wideband?> running a little lean? nice numbers</TD></TR></TABLE>
Are you refering to the 0.973 number? No it's just a correction factor. A/F was around 12.9:1 under WOT.
Are you refering to the 0.973 number? No it's just a correction factor. A/F was around 12.9:1 under WOT.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">does this even make any sense?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yah it makes sense. just because a certain part makes a higher peak number, doesnt mean it will get you down the track faster.
yah it makes sense. just because a certain part makes a higher peak number, doesnt mean it will get you down the track faster.




