syncrowave 300?
well personally i can't see a need for more then 200 amps on a daily basis. I have had no problem welding very large intercoolers with my sync 200 so unless you will be welding very thick aluminum i can't see a reason to spend the extra money on a big welder.
I second not needing more than 200a unless you weld thick things a lot, or are going to stick with it.
I wouldnt even really consider a transformer machine nowendays unless you are going to hammer it and have a super high duty cycle in a production environment.
Look at the thermal arc 185 its a great machine at a good price point with a lot of features the syncrowaves dont have. Same goes for the dynasty 200dx and the lincoln invertec 205
I wouldnt even really consider a transformer machine nowendays unless you are going to hammer it and have a super high duty cycle in a production environment.
Look at the thermal arc 185 its a great machine at a good price point with a lot of features the syncrowaves dont have. Same goes for the dynasty 200dx and the lincoln invertec 205
I haven't outgrown my Syncrowave 200 and don't think I ever will. Even aluminum intakes aren't bad, my buddies older syncrowave 180 is probably even good enough for 95% of hobby stuff.
Trending Topics
I would assume you are looking at an older / used 300 (as the 300s have long since been discontinued I believe) for a good deal which probably defeats the "need" versus "want" discussion. However, I think chris is correct and the deal breaker will be the power requirements. Our sync 350 prior to owning the dynasties was an insane power sucking monster. I can run 5 dynasties for the same power usage as that power pig, and if I remember correctly it was supposed to be more power efficient then older models.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GTlvr82
Audio / Security / Video
23
Apr 4, 2003 03:13 PM



I thought it said syncrowave 200.
