Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

boost vs na

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
Mhollaek9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default boost vs na

I searched but didnt really find anything helpful. CAn anyone post up a site or something that gives in detail why people go all motor as opposed to boost? I am very torn between the two and want to know if anyone got a site or two that has any opinions. I read the latest Super Street but I want some more info before I make this decision... Thanks in advance
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
racebucket_eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default Re: boost vs na (Mhollaek9)

It's really a matter of preference/budget and also your goals for your setup. Some people like the challenge of making hp without a power-adder, while others like boosting their engines for maximum hp. There are millions variations of either method so search the NA Tech and FI forums on this site and figure out which best suites you.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #3  
97L-esVeeTeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: The all motor Forum but my house is in, Iowa
Default Re: boost vs na (Mhollaek9)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mhollaek9 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">.... I read the latest Super Street but I want some more info before I make this decision... Thanks in advance</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats your problem right there...
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
Jay_Sensing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 3
From: I miss the east coast, TX, USA
Default

Just read the forums and decide for yourself.

If you want to be even halfway quick with an all motor setup though, you better be ready to drop some coin because NA power isn't cheap lol. The buy in for 300 hp in a turbo car is pretty cheap. The buy in for 220 NA isn't.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #5  
EG civic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Jay_Sensing)

Yea it will cost more money to go fast n/a, than it would to go with a turbo. But like what was already said its a preference. N/A faster response no lack as in a turbo but it just comes down to what u like.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #6  
base-op.1320's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Moline, IL, US
Default Re: (EG civic)

I personally think turbo cars are more fun - but it takes less hp to run fast in a n\a car - do you like consistant power or peaky power is the question you need to ask yourself
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
-[Lucky]-
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
17
Sep 28, 2007 04:35 AM
DFWRSXS
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
38
Feb 20, 2006 06:38 AM
HYREV2NR
Acura Integra Type-R
38
Jan 22, 2006 06:58 PM
raiden571
Forced Induction
4
Jan 1, 2006 02:40 AM
Boostinghonda
Forced Induction
6
Dec 21, 2004 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 AM.