b20 info
i searched
and i was wondering if anyone has a link to the specs on the b20b and z
i know about compression and everything but im looking for things like r/s ratio
and i was wondering if anyone has a link to the specs on the b20b and z
i know about compression and everything but im looking for things like r/s ratio
alright ive searched almost every honda forum i can think of and strill can't find anything
searched over the web
and even went to barnes and knoble yesterday and couldn't find anything
so currently anything helps
thanks
searched over the web
and even went to barnes and knoble yesterday and couldn't find anything
so currently anything helps
thanks
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by d16vtecx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im pretty sure the b20 has the same 1.54 r/s ratio as LS cuz it has ls crank</TD></TR></TABLE>
that is correct.
B20 has an LS crank w/wider diameter pistons (with updated sleeves)
that is correct.
B20 has an LS crank w/wider diameter pistons (with updated sleeves)
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doodooheadfart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well i read that if you put a B16 head on a B20 block you get a near perfect R/S ratio of 1.74
and i just want to verify this is black and white</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's a total crock of steaming poo.
Changing the head doesn't affect r/s ratio at all. It only changes the compression ratio.
Now, if you swapped out the B20 crank and rods with that of B16B (CTR) crank and rods, then you'd have close to 1.74 r/s.
You're not going to get a 1.74 r/s with an B18A/B or B20 block.
The only way to keep the torque of a B18A/B B20 and get close to 1.74 r/s is by using a B20 crank in a B16A block with a custom short rod and crazy custom short skirted piston. Or somehow extending the deck height of a B18/B20 block and using a custom lengthened rod.
Curious, but why is a 1.74 r/s such a concern of yours?
and i just want to verify this is black and white</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's a total crock of steaming poo.
Changing the head doesn't affect r/s ratio at all. It only changes the compression ratio.
Now, if you swapped out the B20 crank and rods with that of B16B (CTR) crank and rods, then you'd have close to 1.74 r/s.
You're not going to get a 1.74 r/s with an B18A/B or B20 block.
The only way to keep the torque of a B18A/B B20 and get close to 1.74 r/s is by using a B20 crank in a B16A block with a custom short rod and crazy custom short skirted piston. Or somehow extending the deck height of a B18/B20 block and using a custom lengthened rod.
Curious, but why is a 1.74 r/s such a concern of yours?
yeah i don't why i posted that, now that i think about it, it really makes no sense
im concerned abeout r/s ratio because i want the least amount of stress on the cylinder walls because i plan on eventually running low boost
im concerned abeout r/s ratio because i want the least amount of stress on the cylinder walls because i plan on eventually running low boost
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doodooheadfart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah i don't why i posted that, now that i think about it, it really makes no sense
im concerned abeout r/s ratio because i want the least amount of stress on the cylinder walls because i plan on eventually running low boost</TD></TR></TABLE>
ok, then LS/B20 VTEC isn't the way to go.
Either go B16A/B16B/B17A or B18C. Actually a B17A engine is more closer to 1.74 r/s than a B16A is.
good luck...
im concerned abeout r/s ratio because i want the least amount of stress on the cylinder walls because i plan on eventually running low boost</TD></TR></TABLE>
ok, then LS/B20 VTEC isn't the way to go.
Either go B16A/B16B/B17A or B18C. Actually a B17A engine is more closer to 1.74 r/s than a B16A is.
good luck...
well i also want b20 for the money and the torque
and i don't want a B17 due to it being ODB I and my car being ODB II
i have a four door so a 1.6 just don't have the torque im looking for
GSR is just too much for my budget right now
and i don't want a B17 due to it being ODB I and my car being ODB II
i have a four door so a 1.6 just don't have the torque im looking for
GSR is just too much for my budget right now
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doodooheadfart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well i also want b20 for the money and the torque
and i don't want a B17 due to it being ODB I and my car being ODB II
i have a four door so a 1.6 just don't have the torque im looking for
GSR is just too much for my budget right now</TD></TR></TABLE>
B20 non-VTEC would be perfect and reliable then
and i don't want a B17 due to it being ODB I and my car being ODB II
i have a four door so a 1.6 just don't have the torque im looking for
GSR is just too much for my budget right now</TD></TR></TABLE>
B20 non-VTEC would be perfect and reliable then
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doodooheadfart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">but this still doesn't answer my question.
does anyone know where i can find B20 spec's?</TD></TR></TABLE>
check here:
http://hybrid2.honda-perf.org/....html
does anyone know where i can find B20 spec's?</TD></TR></TABLE>
check here:
http://hybrid2.honda-perf.org/....html
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doodooheadfart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">been there
amd they have everything i need except for rod length</TD></TR></TABLE>
same rod length as LS 137mm.
peep this excel sheet:
http://www.ntpog.org/articles/...b.xls
amd they have everything i need except for rod length</TD></TR></TABLE>
same rod length as LS 137mm.
peep this excel sheet:
http://www.ntpog.org/articles/...b.xls
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IntegraGSR(-1)
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
4
Jul 10, 2005 09:52 PM



