Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

B17 crank identification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2003 | 08:29 PM
  #1  
scrambledeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default B17 crank identification

I have a b17 crank and a b16 crank and cant remember which one is which, is there any way to tell the difference between the two?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 07:02 AM
  #2  
PHiZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
From: NL, CT, cuba
Default Re: B17 crank identification (towcivic)

ok, don't quote me on this, but I know that the b16 and b17 block are the same. And the B17 is destroked for an under-squared motor, so the main journals on the B17 should have smaller diamater than the B16.

You might be able to use the numbers on the crank, they extrapolate into the honda bearing color codes.
-PHiZ
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 08:24 AM
  #3  
Kendall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,289
Likes: 1
From: Hendersonville, NC
Default

The B17 will have a longer stroke. And speaking of which, you wouldn't want to sell the B17 crank would you?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #4  
PHiZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
From: NL, CT, cuba
Default Re: (dc231)

Yeah, looks like I had my terminolgy reversed.

Rod length / Stroke(determined by crank) == R/S ratio


B16:
134mm/77.4 == 1.73

B17:
132mm/81.4 == 1.67

So the B17 does have a longer stroke (81.4 > 77.4). But that reduces the rod stroke ratio, which is what I guess I was thinking of.

And as far as oversquare/undersquare, that has to do with BORE*STROKE, so I was talking out my *** on that topic.

So, my new understanding is that the stoke is increased by increasng the offset of the rod journal from the centerline of the crank.

Sorry for the bad info, I welcome any and all corrections.
-PHiZ
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 03:01 PM
  #5  
scrambledeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default Re: (dc231)

I used to want to sell it cause i had no use for it, but now im doing an lsvtec and im using the b17 crank to help with the r/s ratio. I know that using the b17 crank will destroke my motor but i will bore out the cyclinders and put the biggest pistons i can (safely) and maybe some darton sleeves. But if my plans change ill post it for sale on this site.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
scrambledeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default Re: (PHiZ)

Thanks for all the help guys!(or girls)
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #7  
averageJoe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: here and now
Default

In either case (b16a/b17 crank) i "think" you will need custom rods.

the b17 will require custom length rods to fit in the ls block

the b16A crank will use b16B length dimensions, but will require the smaller b16a journal dimensions
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
Katman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 6
From: PASADENA, CA, USA
Default Re: B17 crank identification (towcivic)

there is a way to visually tell the difference between a B16 & B17 cranks.

Take note of the counterweights on either crank:
(sorry if the pics take a few moments to load)





dc231,

I have a clean *** B17 crank for sale if you're interested. Crank only, been checked and cleaned/polished. Hit me up if you're interested. I have pics.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 07:51 PM
  #9  
LudeyKrus's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1
From: Flowery Branch, Ga
Default

It looks like you spun the bearing on the B17's rod #2!!!

Funny the B17 has bigger counterweights; I would of thought the B16 would have bigger counterweights to aid in revving.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 08:31 PM
  #10  
scrambledeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default Re: B17 crank identification (Katman)

[B]THANKS KATMAN [B] that really helps (I love Jdmhondaparts.com) now ive heard about needing custom length rods have any ideas?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 09:49 PM
  #11  
PHiZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
From: NL, CT, cuba
Default Re: (LudeyKrus)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Funny the B17 has bigger counterweights; I would of thought the B16 would have bigger counterweights to aid in revving.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Less rotational mass, plus less friction due to near perfect rod/stroke, maybe?
-PHiZ
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #12  
LudeyKrus's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1
From: Flowery Branch, Ga
Default

What's the redline on the B17 GSR? It has to be lower than the B16.

Most people think that the less rotational mass thing is true, but actually bigger counterweights are better for a higher-revving motor.....which made me think that about that B16/B17 pic
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #13  
Katman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 6
From: PASADENA, CA, USA
Default Re: B17 crank identification (towcivic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by towcivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> [B]THANKS KATMAN [B] that really helps (I love Jdmhondaparts.com) now ive heard about needing custom length rods have any ideas? </TD></TR></TABLE>

your welcome.
Yes, you'll need custom rods for sure, but I don't know what exact size you'll need n' all that. sorry. I've never aided in the build up of a 1.8L block w/B17 crank before.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
Katman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 6
From: PASADENA, CA, USA
Default Re: (LudeyKrus)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What's the redline on the B17 GSR? It has to be lower than the B16.

Most people think that the less rotational mass thing is true, but actually bigger counterweights are better for a higher-revving motor.....which made me think that about that B16/B17 pic</TD></TR></TABLE>

redline of a 92-93 GSR is about 8200-8300rpm.

True about heavier counterweights helping out in the high revs dept. A type-R crank is a prime example of that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bizzle5OH3
Welding / Fabrication
3
May 2, 2011 09:03 AM
YashiMotors
Forced Induction
5
Nov 19, 2004 07:28 AM
mr. wu
Tech / Misc
10
Apr 14, 2004 12:19 PM
NXSpoon
Tech / Misc
1
Jan 10, 2004 03:13 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 AM.