how much bhp does a 89 civic si hb have stock
105 is the factory rating in the manual.
That # is very debatable, since most will push 105-110 WHP on a Dyno. I would venture to say that Honda under-rated the HP by 15%
That # is very debatable, since most will push 105-110 WHP on a Dyno. I would venture to say that Honda under-rated the HP by 15%
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jisu009 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">105 is the factory rating in the manual.
That # is very debatable, since most will push 105-110 WHP on a Dyno. I would venture to say that Honda under-rated the HP by 15% </TD></TR></TABLE>
105 for an 88, 108 for an 89-91...
That # is very debatable, since most will push 105-110 WHP on a Dyno. I would venture to say that Honda under-rated the HP by 15% </TD></TR></TABLE>
105 for an 88, 108 for an 89-91...
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crxgator »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
105 for an 88, 108 for an 89-91...</TD></TR></TABLE>
This is a recent topic of debate......
Where did anyone come up with 108?
My 1989 manual

1989 HP Rating
1991 manual

1991 HP

Modified by jisu009 at 4:39 AM 9/22/2004
105 for an 88, 108 for an 89-91...</TD></TR></TABLE>
This is a recent topic of debate......
Where did anyone come up with 108?
My 1989 manual

1989 HP Rating
1991 manual

1991 HP

Modified by jisu009 at 4:39 AM 9/22/2004
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tony I. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I realize that, however the original question was for a HB.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Civic/CRX share the same manual.
</TD></TR></TABLE>The Civic/CRX share the same manual.
http://members.lycos.nl/hendrik/crx/crxtech2.htm
ENGINE HF DX Si
Type: Aluminum-Alloy In-Line 4 * * *
(88-91) Displacement (cc) 1493 1493 1590
(89-91) Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net) 62 @ 4500 92 @ 6000 108 @ 6000
(89-91) Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) 90 @ 2000 89 @ 4500 100 @ 5000
(88) Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net) Same Same 105 @ 6000
(88) Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) Same Same 98 @ 5000
ENGINE HF DX Si
Type: Aluminum-Alloy In-Line 4 * * *
(88-91) Displacement (cc) 1493 1493 1590
(89-91) Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net) 62 @ 4500 92 @ 6000 108 @ 6000
(89-91) Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) 90 @ 2000 89 @ 4500 100 @ 5000
(88) Horsepower @ rpm (SAE net) Same Same 105 @ 6000
(88) Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) Same Same 98 @ 5000
But dood....
Where does HONDA publish that the car was ever 108HP? There is a difference from that and someones website.....
I am not trying to start a pissing match....i am just curious.
Where does HONDA publish that the car was ever 108HP? There is a difference from that and someones website.....
I am not trying to start a pissing match....i am just curious.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crxgator »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dude search..every site lists it as 108hp, car sites, car and driver, etc...its 108...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?
....To answer the original posters question.
Quick definition of BHP, so everyone is on the same page here:
A measurement of the actual usable power (not calculated power) measured at the output shaft (usually the crankshaft) rather than at the driveshaft or the wheels. Thus none of the auxiliaries (gearbox, generator, alternator, differential, water pump, etc.) are attached. It is called the brake horsepower because the shaft power is usually measured by an absorption dynamometer or "brake." This is not the brake on the vehicle's wheels but a testing device applied to the shaft. This instrument is applied to stop or absorb the rotation of the output shaft and returns a value.
I would *estimate* the BHP of a D16A6 at 120HP, stock out of the box.....
Quick definition of BHP, so everyone is on the same page here:
A measurement of the actual usable power (not calculated power) measured at the output shaft (usually the crankshaft) rather than at the driveshaft or the wheels. Thus none of the auxiliaries (gearbox, generator, alternator, differential, water pump, etc.) are attached. It is called the brake horsepower because the shaft power is usually measured by an absorption dynamometer or "brake." This is not the brake on the vehicle's wheels but a testing device applied to the shaft. This instrument is applied to stop or absorb the rotation of the output shaft and returns a value.
I would *estimate* the BHP of a D16A6 at 120HP, stock out of the box.....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jisu009 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honda says its 108 for 89-91 on brochures and everything, dont know why its like that in your manual...you also know that honda didnt put that out, helms made it for them...
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honda says its 108 for 89-91 on brochures and everything, dont know why its like that in your manual...you also know that honda didnt put that out, helms made it for them...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jisu009 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">....To answer the original posters question.
Quick definition of BHP, so everyone is on the same page here:</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good answer. I'm surprised at how many people do not know what the "B" stands for
Quick definition of BHP, so everyone is on the same page here:</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good answer. I'm surprised at how many people do not know what the "B" stands for
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mike Panic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">who cares? its 3 hp...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I care. 3 HP is the difference in a race weight of 2310lbs. or 2376lbs.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I care. 3 HP is the difference in a race weight of 2310lbs. or 2376lbs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jisu009 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I too have a helms for a 1991 Civic-CRX and the hp table was never changed from the '88 spec. The 105-108 bump was from a slight cam profile change and corresponding ECU mapping changes.
Chances are the Helms don't get revised too often, just look at some of the locations where they spec. the bolt size (ex. 12mm instead of 14mm, etc.). Or for that matter look at the line drawing of the body in the front... It has a "ZC" type hood bump and that rear spoiler, both never applicable to US models. The Helm's are good, probably the best out there (no doubt due to the info supplied to them from the Honda engineers/tech writers), but not perfect.
I do recall seeing the hp change in all the reviews at the time in C&D, R&T, etc. and some Honda material. The only thing I have left is the showroom catalog you typically pick up, so here you go:



P.S. PM me a link when you post up that exhaust system you mentioned in the other thread. It sounds like something I've had in mind but am too lazy to find a good fabricator for.
Then why would HONDA, the manufacture of the car say it's 105? Do you know of any information from HONDA that verfies the HP rating @ 108? A pamphlet, a sales sticker, anything at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I too have a helms for a 1991 Civic-CRX and the hp table was never changed from the '88 spec. The 105-108 bump was from a slight cam profile change and corresponding ECU mapping changes.
Chances are the Helms don't get revised too often, just look at some of the locations where they spec. the bolt size (ex. 12mm instead of 14mm, etc.). Or for that matter look at the line drawing of the body in the front... It has a "ZC" type hood bump and that rear spoiler, both never applicable to US models. The Helm's are good, probably the best out there (no doubt due to the info supplied to them from the Honda engineers/tech writers), but not perfect.
I do recall seeing the hp change in all the reviews at the time in C&D, R&T, etc. and some Honda material. The only thing I have left is the showroom catalog you typically pick up, so here you go:
P.S. PM me a link when you post up that exhaust system you mentioned in the other thread. It sounds like something I've had in mind but am too lazy to find a good fabricator for.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FrostyDC4
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
8
Dec 1, 2004 09:03 AM



