Dynoed friend's GSR hatch
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: SFV, CA
Dynoed friend's GSR hatch
tuned my friend's GSR EG hatch yesterday...
mods:
US B16a2 head
B18c1 block
short ram intake
ericks 65mm TB
skunk2 IM
JDM DC ITR header ( dynoed with open header)
RC440
hondata
163.8WHP @7900
117.6WTQ
dynojet
numbers look right?
mods:
US B16a2 head
B18c1 block
short ram intake
ericks 65mm TB
skunk2 IM
JDM DC ITR header ( dynoed with open header)
RC440
hondata
163.8WHP @7900
117.6WTQ
dynojet
numbers look right?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: SFV, CA
Re: Dynoed friend's GSR hatch (white_n_slow)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by white_n_slow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why the b16a head? You know you just lowered your compression, right?</TD></TR></TABLE>
blew the b16, so went with a GSR short block.. yea CR lower
blew the b16, so went with a GSR short block.. yea CR lower
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: SFV, CA
Re: (Icey112)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Icey112 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">poor mans itr what cams is he running and what pistons</TD></TR></TABLE>
b16a2 cams
b18c1 pistons
gotta scan the sheet...
b16a2 cams
b18c1 pistons
gotta scan the sheet...
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 0
From: Suck it Trebek
Re: (TeamSTEALTH GSR)
yeah b16 cams and low compression so those numbers arent that bad, especially considering theres a skunk2 intake and 65mm TB on there wich isnt really necessary at this point...
acatually looking at it again those numbers seem pretty damn good... a stock gsr motor is gonna pull about 145 and 115 so using smaller cams and less compression your still putting out 20 more hp than a stock gsr. time for some R cams and jdm R pistons
Modified by JCushing at 5:53 PM 8/24/2004
acatually looking at it again those numbers seem pretty damn good... a stock gsr motor is gonna pull about 145 and 115 so using smaller cams and less compression your still putting out 20 more hp than a stock gsr. time for some R cams and jdm R pistons
Modified by JCushing at 5:53 PM 8/24/2004
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Re: Dynoed friend's GSR hatch (TeamSTEALTH GSR)
dont listen to all the noobs who said the numbers suck.
those are great numbers for a stock B16 head with stock B16 cams and that low compression....very good accually...im suprised that it made peak power at 7900rpm with those cams......
cool stuff
those are great numbers for a stock B16 head with stock B16 cams and that low compression....very good accually...im suprised that it made peak power at 7900rpm with those cams......
cool stuff
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: spartanburg, sc, usa
Re: (JCushing)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by non-VTEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dont listen to all the noobs who said the numbers suck.
those are great numbers for a stock B16 head with stock B16 cams and that low compression....very good accually...im suprised that it made peak power at 7900rpm with those cams......
cool stuff </TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JCushing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah b16 cams and low compression so those numbers arent that bad, especially considering theres a skunk2 intake and 65mm TB on there wich isnt really necessary at this point...
acatually looking at it again those numbers seem pretty damn good... a stock gsr motor is gonna pull about 145 and 115 so using smaller cams and less compression your still putting out 20 more hp than a stock gsr. time for some R cams and jdm R pistons </TD></TR></TABLE>see the noobs don't know ****
those are great numbers for a stock B16 head with stock B16 cams and that low compression....very good accually...im suprised that it made peak power at 7900rpm with those cams......
cool stuff </TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JCushing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah b16 cams and low compression so those numbers arent that bad, especially considering theres a skunk2 intake and 65mm TB on there wich isnt really necessary at this point...
acatually looking at it again those numbers seem pretty damn good... a stock gsr motor is gonna pull about 145 and 115 so using smaller cams and less compression your still putting out 20 more hp than a stock gsr. time for some R cams and jdm R pistons
</TD></TR></TABLE>see the noobs don't know ****
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 0
From: Suck it Trebek
Re: (JDMlyfestyle)
its not a gsr, it doesnt have gsr cams or gsr compression...
and you mean to tell me that you made 161hp with bolt ons? i doubt it... it would take at lease ctr cams to get near 165 in a b16
and you mean to tell me that you made 161hp with bolt ons? i doubt it... it would take at lease ctr cams to get near 165 in a b16
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
Re: (JCushing)
damn, so many bench racers...
listen... the # doesn't really matter. he could retest this car when it's 20 degrees lower and probably yank another 5-10 hp out of his ***... different dyno, different day, different numbers.
what's more important is how quickly he reached his powerband, his A/F ratio, and how HE likes the car.
arguments like 'he could have made XXX amount with THESE mods' mean nothing. he ran what he brought, and that's good enough.
scan it and host it on we-todd-did-racing.com
listen... the # doesn't really matter. he could retest this car when it's 20 degrees lower and probably yank another 5-10 hp out of his ***... different dyno, different day, different numbers.
what's more important is how quickly he reached his powerband, his A/F ratio, and how HE likes the car.
arguments like 'he could have made XXX amount with THESE mods' mean nothing. he ran what he brought, and that's good enough.
scan it and host it on we-todd-did-racing.com
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,149
Likes: 1
From: CORNFIELDS, OW3N ME
Re: (JCushing)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JCushing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its not a gsr, it doesnt have gsr cams or gsr compression...
and you mean to tell me that you made 161hp with bolt ons? i doubt it... it would take at lease ctr cams to get near 165 in a b16</TD></TR></TABLE>
here is your proof
right click and save as
161 WHP 113 FT LBS TQ
Modified by JDMlyfestyle at 11:44 PM 8/24/2004
and you mean to tell me that you made 161hp with bolt ons? i doubt it... it would take at lease ctr cams to get near 165 in a b16</TD></TR></TABLE>
here is your proof
right click and save as
161 WHP 113 FT LBS TQ
Modified by JDMlyfestyle at 11:44 PM 8/24/2004
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: SFV, CA
Re: (Icey112)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Icey112 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok thats not that bad why is he running the 440's there pretty big for that setup.If he's going all motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea, the 440s are hurting the power.... but he put em on cuz it was free
ill get a graph from him... but heres a pic of the car
yea, the 440s are hurting the power.... but he put em on cuz it was free
ill get a graph from him... but heres a pic of the car
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
a former member on here put down 172hp and 125tq with a basically stock poor man's setup. all he had was a b16 head, gsr block, usdm itr pistons, itr rods, i/h/e, and a clutch specialties stg2 clutch. i know this because i was there and seen it with my own eyes. he now has an evo thats putting out 305hp and 297tq. that **** is sick