Toda Header, test pipe, cat-back, AEM EMS before/after install (lots of dyno plots)
for more info please visit:
http://www.p1auto.com/jack/s2k/s2kexhaust.htm
2001 S2000
14k miles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
THE BELOW TESTS WERE DONE ON A MUSTANG DYNO MODEL MD-500
NOT, I REPEAT, NOT ON A DYNO JET (WHICH YIELDS HIGHER NUMBERS THAN A MUSTANG DYNO)
Deltas are key, not peak number!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% stock versus (Toda Header, test pipe, cat-back, AEM EMS)



http://www.p1auto.com/jack/s2k/s2kexhaust.htm
2001 S2000
14k miles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
THE BELOW TESTS WERE DONE ON A MUSTANG DYNO MODEL MD-500
NOT, I REPEAT, NOT ON A DYNO JET (WHICH YIELDS HIGHER NUMBERS THAN A MUSTANG DYNO)
Deltas are key, not peak number!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% stock versus (Toda Header, test pipe, cat-back, AEM EMS)



Very nice. Look at those gains in the midrange! Pretty awesome for n/a. I wonder if having an aftermarket intake would yield better results? Do you have a CEL with the test pipe even though you're running the EMS?
Do you have a CEL with the test pipe even though you're running the EMS?
the EMS does not have "CEL" issues, so no to answer your question
the EMS does not have "CEL" issues, so no to answer your question
I see. Thanks for the speedy reply! Its definitely reassuring that you can replicate what vapor has been telling us all along, that there is power to be unleashed from bolt ons with the EMS. Maybe this will shed some light on everyone who thinks the S2000 is maxed out from the factory.
Trending Topics
Jack, thanks for everything once again!
The car feels amazing.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nishant »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks good Jack, wish you were closer. i'd have some work for ya</TD></TR></TABLE>
Make the trip.... it is well worth it!
At P1 you get treated like a friend.... and not just a customer.
The car feels amazing.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nishant »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks good Jack, wish you were closer. i'd have some work for ya</TD></TR></TABLE>
Make the trip.... it is well worth it!
At P1 you get treated like a friend.... and not just a customer.
Nice gains. So a little over 4hp gain by using the AEM EMS. I've been thinking of switching to the AEM EMS on my NSX with similar bolt-on mods. Do you know if these gains are typical with stand-alone's?
Nice gains. So a little over 4hp gain by using the AEM EMS. I've been thinking of switching to the AEM EMS on my NSX with similar bolt-on mods. Do you know if these gains are typical with stand-alone's?
Actually, gains of the F20C via a standalone are normally greater.
This car is a daily driver so a conservative tune was made.
Actually, gains of the F20C via a standalone are normally greater.
This car is a daily driver so a conservative tune was made.
Honestly - if one were to attempt to tune a conservative setup using a VAFCII, what kind of decrease would be see in power? Seeing as you can only tune fuel on the VAFCII (and VTEC obv)....did you tune timing and things like that as well to hit those numbers?
T1R cat back
did you tune timing and things like that as well to hit those numbers?
yes, but not very aggressive
driving wise, do you feel a big diff?
maybe the owner can step in and answer that one, I did not drive the car much in stock trim
did you tune timing and things like that as well to hit those numbers?
yes, but not very aggressive
driving wise, do you feel a big diff?
maybe the owner can step in and answer that one, I did not drive the car much in stock trim
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by R S2 G »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> driving wise, do you feel a big diff?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes. The midrange gains are very usable.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also, what kind of exhaust?</TD></TR></TABLE>
T1R
Yes. The midrange gains are very usable.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also, what kind of exhaust?</TD></TR></TABLE>
T1R
What impresses me most is just how flat that torque curve is, accentuated by your bolt-ons and tuning. Anyone who says that the F20C has crap torque is talking bollocks. 80% availible from 1000rpm (approx 11% of engine rev capability) and it stays roughly the same all the way to, as the plot indicates, 8650rpm. Show me the other reciprocating NA engine that can match that.
WOW just header exhaust gained 16whp
Holyshit !!
I am pretty sure if you get an intake, you will gain lot more power.
Holyshit !!I am pretty sure if you get an intake, you will gain lot more power.
I hope to have my write up done soon after testing the CTAE carbon intake manifold on the 3 stages of dyno tuning done on my car. Can't wait!
Good thread, good info!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vapor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hope to have my write up done soon after testing the CTAE carbon intake manifold on the 3 stages of dyno tuning done on my car. Can't wait!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oooo, looking forward to that!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vapor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hope to have my write up done soon after testing the CTAE carbon intake manifold on the 3 stages of dyno tuning done on my car. Can't wait!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oooo, looking forward to that!



