Found my badge number? Anyone have 1997 ITR #345?
After around a mounth of calls, phone #'s, and names I contacted the origional owner of my 97. He said it was #345. He didn't sound like a car guy and wasn't really concerned about the badge # when he had the car, so I'm posting this just to make sure he was right and no one has this #.
__________________
#517 98 ITR and #345 97 ITR
Also, were is the ITR counting pages?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hungsteR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm skeptical, but if you have a number hook me up. I need to find the number of mine.</TD></TR></TABLE>
he found the original owner.
he found the original owner.
No way! That's crazy b/c I actually have that #. I'll post pics in about five minutes. You know you just can't trust people these days. BTW, just kidding. Congrats & you are one of the few who's actually recovered the number.
-matt (#50)
-matt (#50)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Utilitarian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No way! That's crazy b/c I actually have that #. I'll post pics in about five minutes. You know you just can't trust people these days. BTW, just kidding. Congrats & you are one of the few who's actually recovered the number.
-matt (#50)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jesus!! you had me for a second
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98R-1144 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">congrats! it is kinda funny tho..345 sounds like a number i could have thrown out </TD></TR></TABLE>
It really does, oh well, I'll take it. If i had my choice I'd call the guy again but I don't want to bug a non-car-guy for something he would think is insignificant.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B2FiNiTY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he found the original owner. </TD></TR></TABLE>
-matt (#50)
</TD></TR></TABLE>Jesus!! you had me for a second
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98R-1144 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">congrats! it is kinda funny tho..345 sounds like a number i could have thrown out </TD></TR></TABLE>
It really does, oh well, I'll take it. If i had my choice I'd call the guy again but I don't want to bug a non-car-guy for something he would think is insignificant.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B2FiNiTY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he found the original owner. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B2FiNiTY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he found the original owner. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Dammit, I can't read. No more beers during lunch.....
he found the original owner. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Dammit, I can't read. No more beers during lunch.....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hungsteR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm skeptical, but if you have a number hook me up. I need to find the number of mine.</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you have a compitentparts guy,do vin check on hondanet,they could get the selling dealer #. from there they could find out where it was sold first.that dealer should have the original owner's info.(at the time they bought the car). assuming the dealer is not willing to release that info, you could leave the dealer your contact, and beg and hope they follow thorugh and contact the original owner.
you might be lucky and they might have wrote down the production # on their file. bring the car as proof of what you are doing. so you don't look like a stalker.
another way is through dmv, go get a vehicle history report. tell the supervisor you want to contact the original owner, they will take your info and pass it to the original owner.
but the original owner does not have to contact you. so its a 50-50chance.
if you have a compitentparts guy,do vin check on hondanet,they could get the selling dealer #. from there they could find out where it was sold first.that dealer should have the original owner's info.(at the time they bought the car). assuming the dealer is not willing to release that info, you could leave the dealer your contact, and beg and hope they follow thorugh and contact the original owner.
you might be lucky and they might have wrote down the production # on their file. bring the car as proof of what you are doing. so you don't look like a stalker.
another way is through dmv, go get a vehicle history report. tell the supervisor you want to contact the original owner, they will take your info and pass it to the original owner.
but the original owner does not have to contact you. so its a 50-50chance.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by program »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thanks for the HT and HAN replies Bbasso</TD></TR></TABLE>
Y00 g0t it
Y00 g0t it
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2
From: ROLLING PARANOID WITH A SMILE, ca, USA
hopefully you also asked him if the dealership sent him his confirmation of his 97 itr... its a piece of paper that says so and so is the proud owner of #??? a 1997 integra type r and has the dealership stamp and number along with the name???
but maybe you didnt oh well..
but maybe you didnt oh well..
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Haleiwa-Brando »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does anyone know the exact production run for each year of the U.S. made R's?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honestly, I think the real answer to that is <u>no</u>; however, an Acura employee did hazard the number 318 for the '97 USDM model.
I really believe this has to be an error, and feel the number is closer to 750, based on numbers available to use from club registrations...unless a couple hundred people are just outright lying about the cars they own.
For the other USDM model years (1998, 2000, 2001) I think you're safe with supposing there were 1500-1800 for each of those model years.
Once again, however, people are willing to hazard precise and lower numbers. I just don't think that's right, once again judging from club registration numbers, and in the later years taking into account numbers of RTR cars used in the USDM and produced for the USDM.
There's nothing but controversy surrounding the production numbers, and I don't think we'll ever really know. Honda seems to feel that they like the air of mystery surrounding the production numbers.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Honestly, I think the real answer to that is <u>no</u>; however, an Acura employee did hazard the number 318 for the '97 USDM model.
I really believe this has to be an error, and feel the number is closer to 750, based on numbers available to use from club registrations...unless a couple hundred people are just outright lying about the cars they own.

For the other USDM model years (1998, 2000, 2001) I think you're safe with supposing there were 1500-1800 for each of those model years.
Once again, however, people are willing to hazard precise and lower numbers. I just don't think that's right, once again judging from club registration numbers, and in the later years taking into account numbers of RTR cars used in the USDM and produced for the USDM.
There's nothing but controversy surrounding the production numbers, and I don't think we'll ever really know. Honda seems to feel that they like the air of mystery surrounding the production numbers.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by George Knighton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Honestly, I think the real answer to that is <u>no</u>; however, an Acura employee did hazard the number 318 for the '97 USDM model.
I really believe this has to be an error, and feel the number is closer to 750, based on numbers available to use from club registrations...</TD></TR></TABLE>
There is sufficient and compelling evidence that the ITR production numbers for 97 and 98 are readily available (318 for 97 and 1038 or some such number for 98).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by program »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
After around a mounth of calls, phone #'s, and names I contacted the origional owner of my 97. He said it was #345. He didn't sound like a car guy and wasn't really concerned about the badge # when he had the car, so I'm posting this just to make sure he was right and no one has this #.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Congratulations on getting in touch with the original owner and persevering with your search for and answer.
Now, just go with it or make something up (like your screen name) to put on the armrest badge.
I really believe this has to be an error, and feel the number is closer to 750, based on numbers available to use from club registrations...</TD></TR></TABLE>
There is sufficient and compelling evidence that the ITR production numbers for 97 and 98 are readily available (318 for 97 and 1038 or some such number for 98).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by program »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
After around a mounth of calls, phone #'s, and names I contacted the origional owner of my 97. He said it was #345. He didn't sound like a car guy and wasn't really concerned about the badge # when he had the car, so I'm posting this just to make sure he was right and no one has this #.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Congratulations on getting in touch with the original owner and persevering with your search for and answer.
Now, just go with it or make something up (like your screen name) to put on the armrest badge.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zygspeed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
There is sufficient and compelling evidence....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh, Ed.
I'm willing to be persuaded, but as of this moment I don't see anything that I'd regard as compelling, much less sufficient, assuming we're using sufficient and compelling with their common pleas implications.
There is sufficient and compelling evidence....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh, Ed.
I'm willing to be persuaded, but as of this moment I don't see anything that I'd regard as compelling, much less sufficient, assuming we're using sufficient and compelling with their common pleas implications.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by George Knighton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Oh, Ed.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh George ...
I can understand the uncertainty with respect to the number(s) of ITRs sold in the US in 00 and 01, but the previous letter(s) which have been posted wrt to 97 and 98 should be taken with a good deal of credibility.
One of these days I'll be in the market for an NBP or FBP, but not for another couple years.
Oh, Ed.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Oh George ...
I can understand the uncertainty with respect to the number(s) of ITRs sold in the US in 00 and 01, but the previous letter(s) which have been posted wrt to 97 and 98 should be taken with a good deal of credibility.
One of these days I'll be in the market for an NBP or FBP, but not for another couple years.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bbasso »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oh my 
... two old foggies are going to duke it out over the amount of Rs made in a two year period. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, you betcha!
Maybe I should have waited till after GK's bedtime before posting.
Also, I Guess George has some very high evidenciary standards if he's not willing to recognize the following as factual information.
Hmmmm

... two old foggies are going to duke it out over the amount of Rs made in a two year period. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, you betcha!
Maybe I should have waited till after GK's bedtime before posting.
Also, I Guess George has some very high evidenciary standards if he's not willing to recognize the following as factual information.
Hmmmm






