Camshafts: Skunk2 Stage 1 vs Stock ITR - Dyno results

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:12 AM

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Skunk2 stage 1 cams vs ITR: Dyno results

Here was my ''old'' setup:
98 B18C1
USDM 81.25 ITR pistons
ITR Cat-back/cat
ITR Cams
ITR P73 ECU
ITR Valves springs
Skunks 2 IM
63.5mm TB
DC 4-2-1
Apexi VAFC
AEM 3'' intake
AEM Cam gears

I have made 176.4 whp and 128.9 tq last year.

Added or changed from the old set up is a FPR + Skunk2 retainers + Skunk2 Stage1 cams + my stock P72 ECU with a 9100RPM redline.

Now 182.2 whp and 128.8 tq

Good or no good?

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:13 AM

Rguy

Voted Best Looking GDD Poster

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 6,200

Likes: 0

From: NJ

tuned or no?

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:18 AM

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (Rguy)

yes!

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:22 AM

navin

Honda-Tech Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 4,180

Likes: 1

From: Funfax, VA, United States

Re: (Dom_GsR)

I guess thats good, whats the compression with the USDM ITR OS slugz? I know RainmanEK made close to 200 WHP with skunk2 stage 1s, but he was using JDM ITR OS slugs + mugen headgasket..

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:24 AM

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (navin)

~10.89:1

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:25 AM

RiCE On IcE 2

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 1,488

Likes: 0

From: Cali, ca, usa

Re: (navin)

isn't the skunk 2 ITM just a ITR ITM?

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:41 AM

integrasi

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 1,162

Likes: 0

From: Irvine, CA

Re: (RiCE On IcE 2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RiCE On IcE 2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">isn't the skunk 2 ITM just a ITR ITM?</TD></TR></TABLE>

same w/ bigger inlet.

that's really low.

i had comptech short ram, dc jdm 4-1, bored throttle body to 69mm with spoon axle back made 182 whp.

Trending Topics

JDM honda del sol with B16A engine with Optional LSD? (LSD questions)

7

268
B16a 1989

5

246
BWR Throttle Body Gasket

8

252
Keyless Entry 2000 EX not working

4

193
Honda Element & CR-V Pictures

1.1k

989.3k

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:43 AM

cruzersi99

Junior Member

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 511

Likes: 0

From: CA

Re: Skunk2 stage 1 cams vs ITR: Dyno results (Dom_GsR)

Post up some plots and more information.

You can't tell if things are good by just peak numbers.

Was the same dyno used? What kind of dyno?

Aug 10, 2004 | 10:53 AM

Black R

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Apr 2000

Posts: 12,949

Likes: 8

From: Atlantis

Re: Skunk2 stage 1 cams vs ITR: Dyno results (Dom_GsR)

on the same dyno?

overlay the plots and let's see the midrange #'s.....

Aug 10, 2004 | 11:51 AM

#10

ActiveAero

Paragraph Alert

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 5,560

Likes: 2

From: Oil rig, middle of the ocean

Re: Skunk2 stage 1 cams vs ITR: Dyno results (Black R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Black R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on the same dyno?

overlay the plots and let's see the midrange #'s.....</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is true.

< trapped 100.89mph with "only" 173whp in a stock weight ITR with Skunk stage ones.

Aug 10, 2004 | 12:38 PM

#11

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (RiCE On IcE 2)

skunk2 IM

Aug 10, 2004 | 12:41 PM

#12

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (integrasi)

I will try to find a scanner... and post the plot...

And yes on the same dyno... I have done more than 100 runs on that one

Dynojet

Aug 10, 2004 | 12:42 PM

#13

Chris N

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 14,274

Likes: 0

Re: (integrasi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integrasi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

same w/ bigger inlet.

that's really low.

i had comptech short ram, dc jdm 4-1, bored throttle body to 69mm with spoon axle back made 182 whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Did you ever think to ask what type of dyno? Probably different.

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:11 PM

#14

98cwitr

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 1,169

Likes: 0

From: US

Re: (Chris N)

not worth the $$$ imho

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:17 PM

#15

integrasi

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 1,162

Likes: 0

From: Irvine, CA

Re: (Chris N)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Did you ever think to ask what type of dyno? Probably different.</TD></TR></TABLE>

maybe if you just read above u..........

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:21 PM

#16

thk

Members Only

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 2,793

Likes: 0

From: New York, NY, USA

Re: (integrasi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integrasi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">maybe if you just read above u..........</TD></TR></TABLE>

I believe Chris N is asking if YOU dyno'd your car on the same dyno as the OP. If not, comparing your numbers to his is basically pissin' in the wind.

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:34 PM

#17

integrasi

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 1,162

Likes: 0

From: Irvine, CA

Re: (thk)

mine was done w/ dynameter

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:38 PM

#18

thk

Members Only

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 2,793

Likes: 0

From: New York, NY, USA

Re: (integrasi)

At the same location? On the same day?

I wouldn't worry too much about peak numbers unless it's abnormally low.

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:40 PM

#19

Kengs

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 6,083

Likes: 0

From: Feeling FOBulous

Re: (integrasi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integrasi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

maybe if you just read above u..........</TD></TR></TABLE>

The original poster meant HE used the same dyno for HIS runs.

This is what really annoys me about your posts; the bad English is excusable, but you have <u>nothing to contribute</u> except "i had comptech short ram, dc jdm 4-1, bored throttle body to 69mm with spoon axle back made 182 whp." and "you're not JDM enough."

Aug 10, 2004 | 01:48 PM

#20

milano2kdc2

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,842

Likes: 0

From: bay area, ca

are you running a stock usdm header?

Aug 10, 2004 | 03:38 PM

#21

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (milano2kdc2)

Are you talking about my setup for the USDM headers?

If yes, I'm using a crappy DC 4-2-1... I need my ground clearance

Aug 10, 2004 | 05:21 PM

#22

milano2kdc2

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,842

Likes: 0

From: bay area, ca

Re: (Dom_GsR)

oops didn't see that you put DC 4-2-1 there

Aug 10, 2004 | 05:35 PM

#23

95VXB16A

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 148

Likes: 0

From: Lake Elsinore, ca, usa

Re: (Dom_GsR)

post the both the dyno to compare powerband's!

Aug 10, 2004 | 07:01 PM

#24

Dom_GsR

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

Re: (95VXB16A)

Before I can find someone with a scanner... here's a few numbers...

ITR Cams @ +4 -2
RPM WHP WTQ A/F
4000 89.3 117.3 13.6
4500 99.6 116.2 14.5
5000 106.3 111.7 13.6
5500 118.6 113.3 13.5
6100 149.7 128.9 13.5
6500 157.2 127 13.2
7000 164.9 123.7 12.9
7500 175 122.5 13
7900 176.4 117.3 13.1
8500 167.2 103.3 12.8

Skunk2 Cams @ +2 -2
RPM WHP WTQ A/F
4000 90.4 118.7 13.6
4500 103.1 120.3 14.1
5000 106.7 112.1 13.5
5500 120.1 114.7 13.9
6100 149.6 128.8 13.5
6500 159.3 128.7 13.9
7000 168.6 126.5 13.6
7500 176.8 123.8 13.6
8000 182.2 119.6 13.8
8500 170.2 105.2 13.7
9000 159.5 93.1 13.5

I have all my dyno in a Excel file... if someone wants it... just ask me...

Modified by Dom_GsR at 11:19 PM 8/10/2004