FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2001 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
ITRinEJ1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Trial User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
From: LA/chicago, USA
Default FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard?

i'm in the process of putting together a kit and i ran across a good deal on a Fmax manifold. a friend of mine recommend me not to go for it cuz he says its too restrictive and i guess on another guy's car he has seen it on, doesnt exactly fit rite and the bolts keep coming loose. he tells me revhard is better. i dunno if he meant restrictive cuz the downpipe i know is only like 2.25" and has that recirculation of wastegate gas, but this person has the downpipe w/o the recirculation, but that is no concern cuz i am going with a different downpipe anyhow. and yet another friend tells me Fmax is the best manifold. i had thought Fmax was prolly the best manifold out of Fmax/drag/revhard. anyone want to share their comments on this? i plan to run 15-20psi on track only, 8psi at street if it does see street. this is temporary until i go tubular and build the motor. all comments are welcome, still tryin to learn

also, anyone know if i get this, will either arturbo's 3" DP or max rev's DP work on this manifold? thanks!!

leo
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2001 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
ekb18c's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,140
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ITRinEJ)

Fmax manfiold isnt that great. I had one on my car and it kept on breaking the studs. The screws kept on coming off. I would go with a revhard mani. As far as restrictive. Most cast iron non-tubular are strictive. Spend about the same amt of money and get yourself a TRR tubular manifold. It cost around 450 or so. A revhard or fmax will cost around the same, last time i checked
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2001 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
98hx99b18c's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, az, usa
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ekb18c)

Why dont you take a look at the max-rev manifold, a little cheaper than fmax or revhard and much stronger and durable.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 07:33 AM
  #4  
DamonBoost's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ekb18c)

Fmax manfiold isnt that great. I had one on my car and it kept on breaking the studs. The screws kept on coming off. I would go with a revhard mani. As far as restrictive. Most cast iron non-tubular are strictive. Spend about the same amt of money and get yourself a TRR tubular manifold. It cost around 450 or so. A revhard or fmax will cost around the same, last time i checked
where can find some pics of the trr manifold??
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 08:25 AM
  #5  
ITRinEJ1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Trial User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
From: LA/chicago, USA
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (98hx99b18c)

i have been looking into max rev before, but having known a friend of mine who has used theirs before and seeing that one crack constantly i was not so sure about them, hence i was looking into a cast iron one that will not crack such as revhard. but i may take a shot at max rev after all since geoff does stand behind his product so much, mite as well give it a shot huh?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 09:18 AM
  #6  
Reverend's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO, USA
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ITRinEJ)

I love my Fmax manifold.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 09:42 AM
  #7  
SiR Kid's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (Reverend)

I've seen several f-max's work well... there's a 12.6@120-something crx here in town that uses an f-max with a z-dyne and 60 trim 4/3 hybrid.

Car's alot faster than that, but has major traction issues and the driver lacks "testicular fortitude" as far as I can tell. CRX is being parted out, BTW. Built LS/VTEC. Small intercooler... etc. He's taking almost nothing for the parts, let me knowand I'll ask if anyone needs anything.

Also a full weight SOHC LX Accord with 8 PSI running WAY wrong went 14.60 as well. Had a decent sized t3 take him to that number. Car ran better with the check engine light on. WTF? Needed MORE FUEL!


[Modified by SiR Kid, 12:49 PM 11/26/2001]
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 11:30 AM
  #8  
Davep's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ekb18c)

How can the manifold break studs?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
lazyvietboi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (Davep)

i heard that on the revhard manifold u have to like bend the oil dip stick. is that true?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 12:05 PM
  #10  
TurboTypeR98's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (ITRinEJ)

a RevHard manifold will crack....mine has
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 12:24 PM
  #11  
lazyvietboi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (TurboTypeR98)

a RevHard manifold will crack....mine has
i heard that before too.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 03:23 PM
  #12  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (TurboTypeR98)

a RevHard manifold will crack....mine has
I dont know whether u have the old one or the new one but Arturbo has the old one and his cracked in the top middle.. Although my manifold is the new one and you can see that they strengthened the center section so i guess the new ones are stronger..

Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 03:51 PM
  #13  
Arturbo's Avatar
Better than steak
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (TurboTypeR98)

a RevHard manifold will crack....mine has
DIRep972 is correct. The older rev hards came didnt have extra cast iron to support it, but the newer ones do. I have the old style and mine cracked.

art
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 10:27 PM
  #14  
Mikex25's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Ca, U.S
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (Arturbo)

after your crack a manifold do you go and get it rewelded or you have to buy a brand new one? Also does the new Rev Hard manifold have the same turbo and down pipe position as the older ones? Since I have the older one and mine cracked and wanted to get the newer one would I need to do any modifications to my down pipe or te compressor position?


[Modified by Mikex25, 7:29 AM 11/27/2001]
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: FMAX manifold, comments/better than revhard? (Mikex25)

the new manifold is the same with the exception of the extra strengthening.. The downpipe will fit fine.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2001 | 06:06 PM
  #16  
dohcsideracer's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas, USA
Default answer to "why can the manifold break studs"

I am in no way an expert on this subject, but I have read Corky Bell's "Maximum Boost" (a must read for anyone serious about going turbo, about $25 online) and he says that the thermal expansion of the mounting flange of the manifold is greater then the thermal expansion of the head, and if the outer holes are not enlarged to accomodate the difference, the studs will get sheared right off. This is because the manifold is much hotter (> 1300 F), whereas the head is relatively cool (prolly around 250-300 F on the exhaust side, remember, the head has water in it to carry all that heat away), so you have a rather large difference. And thermal expansion forces are very, very strong; so a 8mm stud is no match.

One way to alleviate the breakage is to enlarge the outer bolt holes, or cut the large mounting flange into 4 (for a 4 cylinder), individual flanges.

Again, I am no expert, but it does seem to make sense to me.

Out and I hope it helped.

Adrian R
'93 del Sol w/ '95 GS-R swap. Awaiting finances to push 15 psi on forged rods and pistons...
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2001 | 06:44 AM
  #17  
SiR Kid's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Default Re: answer to "why can the manifold break studs" (dohcsideracer)

The F-Max has individual ports for the manifold, which are cut and separated. Also, the bolt holes are cut and it allows for expansion in all angles. F-Max for the street would be my choice. Period.

It's a LOG, and flows like ***, but just turn up the boost 2 more PSI to accommodate it
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2001 | 09:20 AM
  #18  
Davep's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Default Re: answer to "why can the manifold break studs" (dohcsideracer)

Oh, that way. Yeah, I don't think you see that happen with the fmax manifolds. They have expansion slots cut into them and the mounting holes are liberally sized.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boostincoupe
Forced Induction
8
May 21, 2006 07:49 PM
Rob!
Forced Induction
4
Feb 2, 2005 02:44 PM
mrbsponge
Forced Induction
5
Sep 16, 2004 11:42 AM
TurboBumblBee
Forced Induction
3
May 1, 2003 12:40 PM
bluebullet
Forced Induction
14
Jun 15, 2002 10:53 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 AM.