For turbo EG's not gutted
B18C
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427
B18C
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ @ 15 PSI
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ @ 15 PSI
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427
Was untuned over 1yr ago (running Hondata now & diff setup, but haven't made it to track).
60 Ft = 2.01
1/4 = 14.1
MPH = 99.8
Running stock 6.5 PSI
Full TEG interior swap
Full TEG A/C swap
Stock clutch
Shitty 15" Kumho 712's
Modified by Honda4CX-T at 9:32 AM 7/16/2004
60 Ft = 2.01
1/4 = 14.1
MPH = 99.8
Running stock 6.5 PSI
Full TEG interior swap
Full TEG A/C swap
Stock clutch
Shitty 15" Kumho 712's
Modified by Honda4CX-T at 9:32 AM 7/16/2004
Thz for everyone's participation...Let's keep them coming! It's nice to know some times on cars w full trim, REAL street cars imo
Trending Topics
13.5 @ 108 w/ 2.3 60'
B18C1 w/ 9:1 compression (stock rods, pistons, used a thicker headgasket to create lower cr)
6 psi with tired clutch
Pieced together the kit myself
Open header
Crappy fmu and inline pump, pump gas and stock p72 ecu
Street tires, 205 55 16 with kumho supra's
B18C1 w/ 9:1 compression (stock rods, pistons, used a thicker headgasket to create lower cr)
6 psi with tired clutch
Pieced together the kit myself
Open header
Crappy fmu and inline pump, pump gas and stock p72 ecu
Street tires, 205 55 16 with kumho supra's
If that's what you have then state it like that, but I would rather see people WITH full trim in here and if more weight is added again they are welcome to let everybody know what they have. To me these times are more impressive (IMO). I soon will be posting my time when my set up is complete and I take it to the track. I'm gonna run full trim, myself (200+lbs), a system with a 12"sub, and maybe even more to add weight. I wanna see what cars do on the track with their daily or atleast close to daily condition (not talkin bout people who drive gutted cars).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 11SECEG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B18C
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427</TD></TR></TABLE>
What CR and Psi if you dont mind?
Good #'s man
SKUNK IM
REVHARD 2C
JE PISTON
EAGLE RODS
350 HP 237 TRQ
11.3 123 MPH
REACTION .990
I1 1.632
I2 4.814
I3 7.341
MPH I3 98.255
I4 9.487
ET 11.320
MPH 123.427</TD></TR></TABLE>
What CR and Psi if you dont mind?
Good #'s man
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by murtnabila »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If that's what you have then state it like that, but I would rather see people WITH full trim in here and if more weight is added again they are welcome to let everybody know what they have. To me these times are more impressive (IMO). I soon will be posting my time when my set up is complete and I take it to the track. I'm gonna run full trim, myself (200+lbs), a system with a 12"sub, and maybe even more to add weight. I wanna see what cars do on the track with their daily or atleast close to daily condition (not talkin bout people who drive gutted cars).</TD></TR></TABLE>
how is it more impressive? the only thing having rear interior changes is the ability to carry passengers and the interior noise. I see no correlation with 1/4 mile times at all. what the hell is 60lbs gonna change when driver weight varies by over 100 lbs. why not ask for total vehicle weight and actually have some information you can use. i'm not trying to mess up your thread but it really provides no usable information. BTW i drive a "gutted" turbo hatch 800 miles a week, impressed?
how is it more impressive? the only thing having rear interior changes is the ability to carry passengers and the interior noise. I see no correlation with 1/4 mile times at all. what the hell is 60lbs gonna change when driver weight varies by over 100 lbs. why not ask for total vehicle weight and actually have some information you can use. i'm not trying to mess up your thread but it really provides no usable information. BTW i drive a "gutted" turbo hatch 800 miles a week, impressed?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bailhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
how is it more impressive? the only thing having rear interior changes is the ability to carry passengers and the interior noise. I see no correlation with 1/4 mile times at all. what the hell is 60lbs gonna change when driver weight varies by over 100 lbs. why not ask for total vehicle weight and actually have some information you can use. i'm not trying to mess up your thread but it really provides no usable information. BTW i drive a "gutted" turbo hatch 800 miles a week, impressed?</TD></TR></TABLE>
If you read again I mentioned IMO (in my OPINION!) you are welcome to your as I am to mine. Your argument makes sense, but i wanna keep my car to be able to carry 5 people if need be and still be able to get on it! Yea the weight question was something I had considered adding in this thread, but I figured most people might not know weight, but if anybody does want to include it and has it please feel free to. For people who have posted please just edit your post.
how is it more impressive? the only thing having rear interior changes is the ability to carry passengers and the interior noise. I see no correlation with 1/4 mile times at all. what the hell is 60lbs gonna change when driver weight varies by over 100 lbs. why not ask for total vehicle weight and actually have some information you can use. i'm not trying to mess up your thread but it really provides no usable information. BTW i drive a "gutted" turbo hatch 800 miles a week, impressed?</TD></TR></TABLE>
If you read again I mentioned IMO (in my OPINION!) you are welcome to your as I am to mine. Your argument makes sense, but i wanna keep my car to be able to carry 5 people if need be and still be able to get on it! Yea the weight question was something I had considered adding in this thread, but I figured most people might not know weight, but if anybody does want to include it and has it please feel free to. For people who have posted please just edit your post.




