five thousand bucks to spend...which way would you go?

 

Turbo ... hands down.

 

Depends. Depends on what car it is going in. If it is a Type R than the stock motor but if its anything else than I say GSR Turbo. If your answer is the latter this is the wrong forum anyway.

 

The ARR motor is probably the better n/a setup, but if the choice is stock R or turbo GS-R, then get the turbo. I used to have a 96 gsr, and now having the ITR, the R is a much more fun car to drive and is surprisingly quick for a 1.8l 4cyl. The car I had before the R was a 93 300zx tt. It was pretty awesome in a straight line, or sideways , but as far as a daily driver, the R is awesome! Good Luck!

 

Turbo all the way.

 

I'd have to say turbo as well.

 

turbo

 

NA>Turbo Lag

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DAsix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NA&gt;Turbo Lag</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nate if you find this sometime today post a pic of the T-shirt gangsta!

Fawk all Motor!

Turbocharge that biatch

 

fo the money spent to boost the c1.... why not setup the c5 with an all motor layout?

 

This isn't a good question...the Type R isn't a drag car, it's a track car...with that said, if you are into tracking, definitely get the Type R. If you want to go fast, the Type R isn't for you anyways because that was not it's intended purpose...it's intended purpose was to take the curves...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by StupidSlowCRX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">fo the money spent to boost the c1.... why not setup the c5 with an all motor layout? </TD></TR></TABLE>

the c5 is a great motor stock but if you looking for speed i would boost the c1. IMO you would be happier with a boosted c1 over the N/A c5!

 

Turbo biatch! haha Philly Crew Expo 4 Tshirt design

 

F all motor! see sig

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DAsix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NA&gt;Turbo Lag</TD></TR></TABLE>

Turbo Lag &gt; NA Lag

 

Turbo Lag = not in anyones vocabulary who actually is turbo'd properly

No contest...

 

this is a retarded debate.
Turbo all the way.

btw. . . .

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by itr206 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"></TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree, BOOST it!

 

NA Lag?????

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DAsix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NA Lag????? </TD></TR></TABLE>


yes NA lagging in power.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by itr206 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


yes NA lagging in power. </TD></TR></TABLE>

itr206 bout to start a riot

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DAsix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NA Lag????? </TD></TR></TABLE>

do you get same response when you step on gas at 4K rpm vs 7K rpm?

so can you say.. your car lags response at low rpm?

i may have to wait for millisecond for my **** to spool to 10psi while at low rpm, but i still make power at 3-4psi, and i'm at 3-4psi as soon as i step on throttle matching whatever you make n/a at lower rpm

 

even with turbo lag, its not a big deal . by the time it does spool can you say . . . buh bye. trust me even if the NA car got the jump the Turbo car would make up real quick.

 

Even if you are going to road race. A proper turbo setup will kickass. As long as you get a turbo with the kind of powerband you want it will work. An 18G torque curve is so linear it looks like an N/A powerband with alot more power and spools almost instantly.

 

its all about the way its set up and tuned. not everyone has needs for a t3/t4, or straight t3, or an 18g. depends on what you want the car to do . people dont understand that most of the time when they get into turbo