Im thinking of selling my EL and getting a 2004 accord V6 coupe anyone driven this model what they think of it.

 

I believe 14's-15's. Stock with the manny.

 

This is stats for the 2003 should be close to the same if not the same.

Transmission: Manual
0-60:
6.2

1/4 Mile:
14.5

1/4 Speed:
98

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMCRX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Im thinking of selling my EL and getting a 2004 accord V6 coupe anyone driven this model what they think of it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

whats EL?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sh0rti &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

whats EL?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Just learned this the other day: I believe its an acura civic...like a mini accord or legend for teh canadian folks.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VRDrvr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Just learned this the other day: I believe its an acura civic...like a mini accord or legend for teh canadian folks.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yep, thats exactly what it is.

http://www.acura.ca/AcuraEng/M...w.htm

 

160 hp i know honda.com has rated it as..... its another number you can quote..... wow.... 6.2 seconds, new i-vtec baby..... if my old 87 did that i'd NEVER get rid of it even when i get married and need a more "reliable" car (its got 268K miles on it, and is starting to show its age, i'm not worried but a few others close to me are)

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dosmastr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">160 hp i know honda.com has rated it as..... its another number you can quote..... wow.... 6.2 seconds, new i-vtec baby..... if my old 87 did that i'd NEVER get rid of it even when i get married and need a more "reliable" car (its got 268K miles on it, and is starting to show its age, i'm not worried but a few others close to me are)</TD></TR></TABLE>

V6=240 ponies

 

The choice is obvious

If all you care about is the quater mile, 0-60, and what not then you know what you gotta do. If things like insurance vehicle costs are just as important as the item mentioned above. Then i guess it would be a little less obvious.

 

no im not worried about insurance called today $25 more a month i just want a quick car i can drive sick of working on **** and being broke.

 

I have the 2004 Accord EX V6 w/ NAV (which was only available with an automatic) and it actually gets up and goes. It's light on torque, so you have to floor it (wait until the engine is warm to prevent problems down the road) but it accelerates nicely.

It has quite a bit of body roll going on, so corners don't feel good. And it starts to push pretty easily.

The brakes feel really good, though.

 

0 - 60 Time (seconds) - 6.84
1/4 Mile Time (seconds) -15.34
1/4 Mile Speed (mph) - 95.70
Braking 60 - 0 mph (ft.) - 144

so
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 91wagon &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Transmission: Manual
0-60:
6.2

1/4 Mile:
14.5

1/4 Speed:
98</TD></TR></TABLE>
maybe with some mods, otherwise you're still talking mid 15's

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VRDrvr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Just learned this the other day: I believe its an acura civic...like a mini accord or legend for teh canadian folks.

</TD></TR></TABLE>


You learn something new everyday.

 

According to Car and Driver, they've been able to get the times 91wagon listed. But the times that you listed (skizot722) is probably more realistic for most drivers.

 

wtf, if you are not a retard you can get that car in the 14's stock. you should be nowhere near mid 15s