Check out my friends dyno sheet...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by stock93cx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">u sure its a b20 not a b16</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm sure. Torque numbers look off too.
I'm sure. Torque numbers look off too.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Manuel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">http://www.importreview.com/dy...2.jpg
Dyon IB Motor
Stock b20 block
stock b16a head
ITR cam's
IB spec. Jg header
Mid rang and torque
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's good torque, looks like my boy is only putting down 114 lb ft of tq. could it be the dyno he was on?
Dyon IB Motor
Stock b20 block
stock b16a head
ITR cam's
IB spec. Jg header
Mid rang and torque
</TD></TR></TABLE>That's good torque, looks like my boy is only putting down 114 lb ft of tq. could it be the dyno he was on?
Trending Topics
YES! it is the dyno he was on. it is a dyno dynamic dynomameter. If u want to convert these #'s to dynojet numbers u want to add ~14%.
Do this and u will find the numbers are what they should be.
Do this and u will find the numbers are what they should be.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Used2beAb16 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">YES! it is the dyno he was on. it is a dyno dynamic dynomameter. If u want to convert these #'s to dynojet numbers u want to add ~14%.
Do this and u will find the numbers are what they should be.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was told by a guy who owns a dyno dynamic, that it was half as that? Roughly 6-8% off from a dynojet.
Do this and u will find the numbers are what they should be.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was told by a guy who owns a dyno dynamic, that it was half as that? Roughly 6-8% off from a dynojet.
just a quick little blurb out of the newest SCC. they compared various dynos and their results with a 4.0L ford ranger (picked for its low specific output). a dyno dynamics dyno spat out a number of 132HP and 169tq. three dynojets in the test put out an avg of 168.7HP and 201tq
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by soccaian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just a quick little blurb out of the newest SCC. they compared various dynos and their results with a 4.0L ford ranger (picked for its low specific output). a dyno dynamics dyno spat out a number of 132HP and 169tq. three dynojets in the test put out an avg of 168.7HP and 201tq</TD></TR></TABLE>
So what do you think the accuals are?
So what do you think the accuals are?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by UNDER PRESSURE »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
..my boy...</TD></TR></TABLE>
DAMMIT why does everyone say that! its the most ghettoest ricer-sounding word in the world!
BAHH!!
..my boy...</TD></TR></TABLE>
DAMMIT why does everyone say that! its the most ghettoest ricer-sounding word in the world!
BAHH!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkRiBLaH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
DAMMIT why does everyone say that! its the most ghettoest ricer-sounding word in the world!
BAHH!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
That word is commonly used on the west coast, I don't give a damn if you don't like it
.
DAMMIT why does everyone say that! its the most ghettoest ricer-sounding word in the world!
BAHH!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
That word is commonly used on the west coast, I don't give a damn if you don't like it
.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by UNDER PRESSURE »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That word is commonly used on the west coast, I don't give a damn if you don't like it
.</TD></TR></TABLE>I haven't heard anybody say that in Southern Cali, maybe it's a mid-west thing
.</TD></TR></TABLE>I haven't heard anybody say that in Southern Cali, maybe it's a mid-west thing
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by soccaian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just a quick little blurb out of the newest SCC. they compared various dynos and their results with a 4.0L ford ranger (picked for its low specific output). a dyno dynamics dyno spat out a number of 132HP and 169tq. three dynojets in the test put out an avg of 168.7HP and 201tq</TD></TR></TABLE>
I just had my car dyno'd on a Dyno Dynamics. I asked the tuner what (if any) correction needed to be done in order to get a "dynojet" number, and he said it was all in the calibration of the DD unit itself.
DD=a superior tuning tool. I have over 60 seperate points telling me what the torque, hp, a/f and rpm's were at. Genius machine!
I just had my car dyno'd on a Dyno Dynamics. I asked the tuner what (if any) correction needed to be done in order to get a "dynojet" number, and he said it was all in the calibration of the DD unit itself.
DD=a superior tuning tool. I have over 60 seperate points telling me what the torque, hp, a/f and rpm's were at. Genius machine!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hagakure
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
4
Aug 22, 2008 12:50 PM



