HEy guys, i was just wondering how you think the 94+ tegs handel compared to a 92-95 civic. I am just debating on which car to buy and i would really appericate any coments.

thanks
Andy

 

your in a integra forum, so the answer would be an integra

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Andyb22g &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">HEy guys, i was just wondering how you think the 94+ tegs handel compared to a 92-95 civic. I am just debating on which car to buy and i would really appericate any coments.

thanks
Andy</TD></TR></TABLE>

well, your gonna end up working on the suspension either way, so iono what to say.

 

There not really that differant, unless your talking type R

 

honestly...i felt more comfortable in my civic than i do with my integra.

civic 94
neuspeed race
kyb agx

integra 96
type r suspension
neuspeed race
tokico blues

car felt more rigid on the civic to me..
i still love the integra tho!

 

i would like to know and how do the civics compare to the Da's?

 

my 91 teg only has a upper strut bar and sportlines. and it feels really stiff even with my crappy yokohama avs es100's i hardly ever feel it slipping in tight turns.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by g2jdmteg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my 91 teg only has a upper strut bar and sportlines. and it feels really stiff even with my crappy yokohama avs es100's i hardly ever feel it slipping in tight turns.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You aren't driving fast enough, then.

I believe the Integras generally weigh more but have stiffer setups from the factory.

Having a B18 is nice too.

 

I have a 98 GSR and it is way stiffer from the factory than any stock civic I've driven. Also the streering is much quicker. It also has more bias towards oversteer then to plow and understeer (Stock).

 

I thought the yokohama avs es100's were good tires, no?

 

i had a 99 si and totaled it now i have 00 gsr and i have the same exact suspension same exact one i trasnfered everything over and the integra handles so much betterth rear doesnt want to slide around as easy, i also have the same brand tires on the same size rims. trust me get the teg.

 

I have a '91 civic that hugs the best but my '94 civic vs. 95 teg ls it's close.

 

From my understanding an Integra is just a fancied up Civic, so they should be about the same. Sort of like the differences between the GM F bodies. Camaro and Firebird.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 4crx4me &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">From my understanding an Integra is just a fancied up Civic, so they should be about the same. Sort of like the differences between the GM F bodies. Camaro and Firebird.</TD></TR></TABLE>

is this a joke?? civic and integra would then share the same frames?? do they share the same suspension??


Modified by LSTEG96 at 10:20 PM 6/6/2004

 

No this is not a joke wise ***.
And they do share the same basic suspension! That's what makes swapping possible. Shut-up and learn. Know it all.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LSTEG96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

is this a joke?? civic and integra would then share the same frames?? AND suspension then...? hm... wtf</TD></TR></TABLE>

hes right, i heard the same too the chassis is like the same.

 

The Integra's chassis is a derivative of the Civic's.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by webster's &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Main Entry: 2derivative
Function: adjective
1 : formed by derivation
2 : made up of or marked by derived elements
3 : lacking originality : BANAL
- de·riv·a·tive·ly adverb
- de·riv·a·tive·ness noun

</TD></TR></TABLE>
The welded, all-steel body shares the Civic's underbody construction, however, it has a sturdier upper structure. The body is stiffer by 40% in bending and 20% in torsion than the previous Integra's. Each door has crushable, impact-energy-absorbing members in addition to the usual impact-beam bar. The driver- and front-passenger-side SRS air bags are optionally installed on the Japanese Integra.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IVI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Integra's chassis is a derivative of the Civic's.


</TD></TR></TABLE>

(f(x+h)-f(x))/h

 

a civic would own in handling. my old eg si handled way better than my teg will ever handle. my old eg had stock shocks, neuspeed sport springs, gsr rear sway, ebay rear tie bar, neuspeed front tower bar, dc rear strut bar, gsr tranny w/quaife and handled like a charm.

teg has gsr tranny w/kazz, itr rear sway with bsq kit, blisten monotube shocks, h&r sport springs, itr front tower bar, ebay front and rear tie bars, dc rear strut bar and it handles like a pig. it's solid on the turns, but still feels like a pig.

maybe if it lost a little weight it would handle a lot better but i'm not the person to go stripping my car as i use it as a daily commuter. just giving my opinion based on my experiences with both cars.

oh yeah, both had LS motors and turbo'd as well.

 

My stock 1990 DA handles way better than any civic I have ever driven.

 

JDM integras and SOHC motors?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LSTEG96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JDM integras and SOHC motors? </TD></TR></TABLE>

what are you talking about?
are you drunk?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IVI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

what are you talking about?
are you drunk?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
ROFLMFAOAC, brwahahhrrrharrh

 

Nah, a stock Teg handles way better than any stock Civic.

 

My 92 hatch handled like a champ.
My 92 gsr can handle, but it throws its weight around.