Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
95VXB16A's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Lake Elsinore, ca, usa
Default To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup?

Alright guys I need your help and experience. I'm torn apart to either just slap a turbo on my b16, and boost it to 8 psi on stock internals and call it a day. Or to slowly build an ls or gsr bottom end, to run 11:1- 11.5:1 n/a motor. I already have a Cai, Jdm dc 4-1 header, and Greddy PE exhaust. Sitting in my room are ITR valve springs, retainers, mugen 2-layer gasket, aem cam gears, just waitng for cams now, but don't know YET. I have about $2,500 to spend, and my goal is to run mid to low 13's with slicks, but yet some what of reliability. Currently I run mid 14's with some DR's. I'm kinda thinking of staying the n/a route cause of all the parts I have already. I've also noticed that turbo makes much more power, but I've heard that turbo #'s are just OVERRATED #'s vs the N/A power. Is that why a 200 whp n/a will be quicker than 200 whp turbo in the 1/4? So this is my dilemma, if anyone can help I really appreciate it.
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
slammed00si's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 415
Likes: 1
From: south the deep south, tx, us
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (95VXB16A)

im not the smartest man but whp=whp. be it turbo,sc,or na.
i would actually think the na would be slowest due to the very narrow powerband our hondas produce. a sc or turbo will give you power a lot lower in the rpms then a na that needs to rev to insane levels. just my oppinion tho i could be wrong.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 05:31 AM
  #3  
Rod.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (slammed00si)

boost the b16. A N/a gsr would be pretty quick if you do the right things. A ls n/a probably be your last decision right there. Go with the quickest out of the 3(b16 turbo)
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 06:25 AM
  #4  
Sliced Beard's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (redturbocivic)

i say go with the GSR and get some good cams and get a port and polish done
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #5  
Jockdeeznutz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (dirtyd463)

Il say what alot of people say
Turbo is for people with a budget..making ur own turbo kit is cheap if u know what ur doing

N/A is for people with deep pockets
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #6  
95VXB16A's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Lake Elsinore, ca, usa
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (Jockdeeznutz)

yes very true, but which setup would last longer, and be a daily driven car. The turbo set 7 psi, or the gs-r bottom end with 11.5 compression with some CTR cams?
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #7  
Jockdeeznutz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: To turbo the B16 or run ls/ poor man's R n/a setup? (95VXB16A)

A gsr bottom with 11.5 compression with ctr cams can be just as reliable as a turbo 7 PSI. It's all in the <U>TUNING</U>
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptainBuster
Acura Integra
4
Aug 10, 2014 03:26 AM
saugustine18
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
Mar 5, 2009 12:44 PM
swappedb16teg
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
6
Mar 24, 2005 05:53 PM
Shift!
Forced Induction
14
Apr 20, 2003 07:37 AM
MNturbosi
Forced Induction
2
Jan 9, 2003 04:45 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM.