sohc zc tranny
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HumanResource »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
90-93 NON ABS (if it matters) Integ axles</TD></TR></TABLE>
abs and non abs are essentially the same. only difference is the abs axles have a ring around them that the abs sensors "sense" but size wise, and fitment wise... they're the same, so either should work.
90-93 NON ABS (if it matters) Integ axles</TD></TR></TABLE>
abs and non abs are essentially the same. only difference is the abs axles have a ring around them that the abs sensors "sense" but size wise, and fitment wise... they're the same, so either should work.
So, you're saying that my axels myght not be the right ones?
Don't mean to hijack the post, but i have a SOHC zc engine on my 90 Si. The car still has the Si tranny, dist, flywheel,crank.
Theonly thing is, that no matter how much i adjust the clutch or whta not it seams as if tho my tranny and engine are not in sync.
Don't mean to hijack the post, but i have a SOHC zc engine on my 90 Si. The car still has the Si tranny, dist, flywheel,crank.
Theonly thing is, that no matter how much i adjust the clutch or whta not it seams as if tho my tranny and engine are not in sync.
sohc zc tranny are the same as the usdm si tranny. so no u don't need to change ur axles. the dohc zc tranny is the one with the equal length axles which require the 90-93 integra axles and the zc intermediate shaft.
SOHC ZC not the same as D16A6 trans
there is no JDM equiv to the "Si" USDM trans
I know they did off some trans that do not require the use of an intermediate shaft, BUT these are equiv to DX trans
there is no JDM equiv to the "Si" USDM trans
I know they did off some trans that do not require the use of an intermediate shaft, BUT these are equiv to DX trans
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HumanResource »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">SOHC ZC not the same as D16A6 trans
there is no JDM equiv to the "Si" USDM trans
I know they did off some trans that do not require the use of an intermediate shaft, BUT these are equiv to DX trans</TD></TR></TABLE>
what about the 1.5X, that has the same gearing and final drive as the USDM Si...
there is no JDM equiv to the "Si" USDM trans
I know they did off some trans that do not require the use of an intermediate shaft, BUT these are equiv to DX trans</TD></TR></TABLE>
what about the 1.5X, that has the same gearing and final drive as the USDM Si...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HumanResource »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what?
that's a new one for me?
got any pics?</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.teamsdxracing.com/specs.htm
here is just one site, scroll all the way to the bottom...
that's a new one for me?
got any pics?</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.teamsdxracing.com/specs.htm
here is just one site, scroll all the way to the bottom...
Hmmm look at that 4.25 indeed
I'm gonna hafta look again
I've checked (2) trannys off the carb'd SOHCs and both turned the same as the DX, but I'm gonna hafta focus more on the D15 carb'd engines
I'm gonna hafta look again
I've checked (2) trannys off the carb'd SOHCs and both turned the same as the DX, but I'm gonna hafta focus more on the D15 carb'd engines
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hybrid1990crx
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Jul 29, 2005 12:55 PM



