b16 vs. sohc turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
crlexus's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Default b16 vs. sohc turbo

Im in a situation right now where i've been offered the option of trading my b16 swap for a z6 turbo swap including just about everything. I only have to pay for the harness and block. I've spent some time around swapping motors i.e., watching my b16 getting swapped into my CRX, but couldn't do the work by myself. So basically I wouldn't have to pay this guy to install the turbo swap and would just pay for the block and harness so he could make some $$ of this trade.
Good idea?? (his turbo setup made 170 WHP and 170 lb/ft)
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
Discostud's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, Sc
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (crlexus)

well youre b16 makes about 160 stock so think about then answer youre own ?
the b is a much better platform,plus its already in youre car
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #3  
crlexus's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (downset-crx)

160 stock... isn't that more of a crank horsepower #?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #4  
out_of_order's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: never, ok, usa
Default

depends what you want your car to run and whats it for...daily,drag,autox... snow plowing,off-road,fishing...haha you get the idea
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #5  
Smokinsax's Avatar
The Boot
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 0
From: Arizona, US
Default

have you been to the forced induction forum lately? They are pulling out some crazy #'s from turbo SOHC's.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #6  
crlexus's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Default Re: (gotriceboy05)

I want the car to be a daily driver, but I wouldn't mind the 30 xtra hp and the 60-70 xtra trq. The only reason why I am considering is because I could have those #'s for only a few hundred $$'s.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
y49crxsi's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Merritt Island, FL, USA
Default Re: (crlexus)

Well, i havent owned a b16a crx before, but ive been in them, and well, it depends on what you plan on doing. If you can get some more money, then keep the b16a, because ive ridden in a turbo b16a, with stock internals, pushing over 250, maybe it was 270 whp, and it was a blast. Wasnt expensive either. I myself now have a small ihi turbo pushing 9 psi on my z6, and its sooo fun, but theres only so far a d16 can go on stock internals. THe b can push 300 on stock internals, where teh d is limited to about 200 safely, but i ve seen 215 being put down on a daily driver z6, stock internaled. Its really up to you, how far do you want to go.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #8  
SC0TT's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: washington state
Default

I owned a b16 crx and finished a z6 turbo on my friends hatch this past weekend. The z6 at 6psi was definately quicker than the b16 crx.

But the downside to turbo setups is the constant maintenance and tuning. Along with sketchy reliablilty.

Since you already have the b16, I would peice together a kit (with help if not experienced). I'll bet in a couple months of owning the boosted z6, you'll want more power. Be patient.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #9  
crlexus's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Default Re: (y49crxsi)

That's pretty much the idea. I'm not in a position to build a turbo setup for the b16, so im thinking the sohc turbo would be the most fun for my budget. Thanks for the feedback. Any talk about reliability issues the z6?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #10  
hauser's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Default Re: (crlexus)

Don't do it. Mom will kill you when it breaks. Just keep the lexo as is, (reliable) and

turn it into "Project CRLexus" once you graduate and get a real job.

Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #11  
biglebowskicivic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: dirty jersey
Default Re: (hauser)

you should keep the b16. 1. its in your car already 2. whithout money to throw around then the d series is pushing the most horsepower its gonna 3. the b16 revs to 82 and has vtec, which is fun, and to repeat info already posted is stronger internally, so saving the money for a turbo on the b16 would better IMO.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #12  
spaceman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default Re: (biglebowskicivic)

hey its the dood...turbo takes good tuning knowledge and isnt as reliable as n/a for honda unless you know what your doing..good luck either way
Reply
Old May 2, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #13  
1boostedcivic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: omaha, ne, United States
Default Re: (spaceman)

you will be dumping a lil more than few hundred bucks but-
my vote is turbo sohc
Reply
Old May 2, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #14  
kim_2_da_chee's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: (1zexxedcivic)

my vote is stay N/A
just spend the few hundred bucks to build ur B16.. (ie: cams, valves, pistons, p&p)you'll get the same kinda numbers... plus more reliability.
Reply
Old May 2, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #15  
d15bcrex's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: mansfield, ohio, us
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (crlexus)

you can make the single cam kill the b16 and stay N/A, turbo it and tune it and it will be kinda quick
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
biglebowskicivic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: dirty jersey
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (d15bcrex)

building up a single cam n/a or turbo would be a good project, but its a lot more time and money than just starting with the more powerful motor from the start.
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #17  
RuthlessEF-9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,237
Likes: 0
From: Kapolei, Hawaii, USA
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (biglebowskicivic)

I didn't spend too much. you just have to research and buy the necessary things you need , not the things you want

I say SOHC turbo

but im biased
Reply
Old May 7, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #18  
96-EJ6 B18C's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Tri Cities, WA
Default Re: b16 vs. sohc turbo (RuthlessEF-9)

Boost it!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xwhitchx
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
29
Mar 10, 2010 08:28 AM
mannyfresh2.0
Forced Induction
16
Feb 12, 2006 07:45 PM
bbrian
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
Sep 27, 2005 07:03 PM
NerveAgent
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
Feb 28, 2005 10:07 AM
youngwon22
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
32
Aug 7, 2003 10:52 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM.