Coupe => Hatch
Anyone pulled their current motor from their coupe and swapped it into a hatch? Trying to get a rough estimate how much faster the times would be swapping your exact coupe setup into a hatch chasis.
For example...
160 whp GSR Swap in a 96-00 Civic Coupe => 160 whp GSR Swap in a 96-00 Civic Hatch.
How much faster (roughly) is the hatchback now going to run now with the smaller chasis compared to the coupe chasis? Reason why I'm asking is, I was origionally running 13.5 in my EM1 w/ITR swap and wondered what it'd run if I swapped my setup in a EK hatch?
For example...
160 whp GSR Swap in a 96-00 Civic Coupe => 160 whp GSR Swap in a 96-00 Civic Hatch.
How much faster (roughly) is the hatchback now going to run now with the smaller chasis compared to the coupe chasis? Reason why I'm asking is, I was origionally running 13.5 in my EM1 w/ITR swap and wondered what it'd run if I swapped my setup in a EK hatch?
I pulled my b18c turbo from a 96 ex coupe and put it in a 92 dx hatch. Both had full interior. The motor was tuned with hondata when it was in the coupe and it made 232 whp. I ran a 8.29 @ 85 in the 1/8th. I pulled the motor out and put it in a hatch. I DID NOT have the hondata installed in the hatch. I used a FMU, but I do plan on installing the hondata in the hatch and getting it re-tuned. With the hatch I Ran a 8.33@ 85 in the 1/8th. I know for a fact when I do get the hatch tuned, I will be in the mid 7s. It is definately worth it imo.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by erics99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone else? You ran slower in the hatch than you did in the coupe... thats not very convincing..lol </TD></TR></TABLE>
read his post, he didnt have the hondata tuned.
read his post, he didnt have the hondata tuned.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">eric, ur building a NA car i would never ever run a 2500 lb coupe in NA configuration. even with weight reduction its still heavy compared to a hatch.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I know, thats what I'm debating on... I was gonna buy a $7000 quad this late summer but I got to thinking about it and maybe I should buy a hatch and use the money to do something like yours in a way so I can get those faster times.. $5000 for a hatch and $2000 for a trailer set aside could prolly buy something reasonable (haven't really looked around yet) then I'd put my Si Coupe back to stockish form and daily drive that again or sell/trade it in on something else...
I know, thats what I'm debating on... I was gonna buy a $7000 quad this late summer but I got to thinking about it and maybe I should buy a hatch and use the money to do something like yours in a way so I can get those faster times.. $5000 for a hatch and $2000 for a trailer set aside could prolly buy something reasonable (haven't really looked around yet) then I'd put my Si Coupe back to stockish form and daily drive that again or sell/trade it in on something else...
Trending Topics
u must have read about the reason i swapped to a hatch. i guess because i was tired of my daily driver breaking axles from track abuse. i got my trailer for 1800 brand new down by boise.
First of all hatches and coupes of the same year and trim do not have that much of a difference in weight. For instance a 92 dx hatch is 2178lbs, the dx coupe is 2240lbs, and the dx 4door is 2275. What the heck is the big difference. Yes in the 1320 it may slow you down a little, but not enough to pick one over the other, unless you race 4 $$$$$ which most Honda guys don't.
u have a valid point but who the **** cares about comparing trim levels???? he drives a 99 civic SI, that right there is 2560 give or take. now drop him into a 92 CX or VX that weights 2080lbs bone stock and u lost 500lbs. i picked up my hatch for $1300.
First of all if you read his first lines carefully, you would see that he is asking a general question. He asked if anyone has taken an engine out of a coupe, and put it in a hatch. He didn't say has anyone taken it out of a 99si and put it into a CX. Now in that senerio it would be a huge difference in performance, but the question was general.
sorry about being so braud... What I was thinking is swapping motors with a 99Si into like a 99CX Hatch
* 1 2 NV: What header are you running? I'm thinking about upgrading headers this season and I'm stuck on what header I should run..
* 1 2 NV: What header are you running? I'm thinking about upgrading headers this season and I'm stuck on what header I should run..
would swapping everything over from my Si to a 99 DX hatch be benifitial? whats the weight difference I'd save in chasis weight? How much lighter is teh 99 DX hatch to the 99 Civic SI
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by erics99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone else? You ran slower in the hatch than you did in the coupe... thats not very convincing..lol </TD></TR></TABLE> I ran slower in the hatch with a FMU. Lets put it this way, when the coupe had the fmu, it was running 8.80s in the 1/8th. The hatch ran 8.30's with the same fmu setup.
1992 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2178
1992 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2094
1992 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2275
1992 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2326
1992 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1992 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2224
1992 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2317
1992 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2390
1992 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2445
EG 1992 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2275
EG 1992 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2342
EG 1992 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2319
EG 1992 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2388
EG 1992 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2480
EG 1992 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2524
1999 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2395
1999 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2423
1999 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2388
1999 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2434
1999 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2359
1999 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2405
1999 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2513
1999 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2560
1999 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2370
1999 Honda Civic HX CPE AT 2445
1999 Honda Civic Si CPE MT 2612
EK 1999 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2339
EK 1999 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2388
EK 1999 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2410
EK 1999 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2456
EK 1999 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2513
EK 1999 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2562
1992 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2094
1992 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2275
1992 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2326
1992 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1992 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2224
1992 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2317
1992 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2390
1992 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2445
EG 1992 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2275
EG 1992 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2342
EG 1992 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2319
EG 1992 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2388
EG 1992 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2480
EG 1992 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2524
1999 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2395
1999 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2423
1999 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2388
1999 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2434
1999 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2359
1999 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2405
1999 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2513
1999 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2560
1999 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2370
1999 Honda Civic HX CPE AT 2445
1999 Honda Civic Si CPE MT 2612
EK 1999 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2339
EK 1999 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2388
EK 1999 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2410
EK 1999 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2456
EK 1999 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2513
EK 1999 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2562
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would never ever run a 2500 lb coupe in NA configuration. Even with weight reduction its still heavy compared to a hatch.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Don't count us coupes out completely. Coupes are sexier
We just have to make more power to beat you hatches
Don't count us coupes out completely. Coupes are sexier
We just have to make more power to beat you hatches
I wonder about the weight on that dx/mt hatch at 2388 lbs. I did very little weight reduction to my 98 (virtually identical), and have had it on scales a few times (autox car). It weighed between 2220 and 2239 every time. That's with full stock interior, stock motor, removed spare tire, and race wheels/tires (light but not that light..), and 1/4 tank of gas.
A friend's 92 VX did weigh very close to 2094 lbs though..
edit: and I know there hasn't been any "funny business" with this car because I bought it new..
Modified by fsp31 at 3:44 PM 4/29/2004
A friend's 92 VX did weigh very close to 2094 lbs though..
edit: and I know there hasn't been any "funny business" with this car because I bought it new..
Modified by fsp31 at 3:44 PM 4/29/2004
and the weights that were given in that list, don't include your extra weight from the swap. If you not trying to set records, i'd stay with the coupe. spend your money and time to pull some more hp from your current setup.
i agree 96-00 coupes and hatches arent too far apart from each other especially if u do some weight reduction to switch wouldnt be worth the time and effort unless u were gonna go with a 92-95 hatch in which case u would be 300-500 lbs lighter
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Don't count us coupes out completely. Coupes are sexier
We just have to make more power to beat you hatches
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hell yeah and those pesky CRX's damm lucky HF guys lol
We just have to make more power to beat you hatches
</TD></TR></TABLE> Hell yeah and those pesky CRX's damm lucky HF guys lol
I'm not sure but I think when you go from a D series motor to a B series you gain between 50 to 75lbs. Also I feel what u sayin. Some of the same people that want to take a motor ot of 1 car to put in another car ain't even racing for $$$$$, or trying to set a record. They just running up and down the street hitting VTEC every chance they get, and lining up occasionally at the weekend races. I know some personally. Now taking a motor out of a 99si into 88hf crx ain't that bad.


