Went to the dyno today
host your pic from photobucket.com and link it via "IMG" and it'll work...or you can try we-todd-did. or imagestation as well...
nice numbers btw
nice numbers btw
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 0
From: Destroying turbo ITR motors in Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xrc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there we go</TD></TR></TABLE>
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostincoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
</TD></TR></TABLE>God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.
thanks for the comments,
boostin coupe: good to hear that you pull same # with more trq for 1/2 the price, but I was posting up my dyno sheet, not wanting to start a n/a vs turbo thread.
aem cai/jdm 4-1/apex n1, only mods.
boostin coupe: good to hear that you pull same # with more trq for 1/2 the price, but I was posting up my dyno sheet, not wanting to start a n/a vs turbo thread.
aem cai/jdm 4-1/apex n1, only mods.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostincoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, but hp numbers don't always tell the story either. It takes more power turbo to go the same 1/4 mi time as opposed to NA. A 260hp NA motor could propel a light hatch into the 11's, it takes a lot more than that turbo to hit 11's. Why? Maybe the power band is different but it just seems that way.
Nice numbers xrc.
s
God I would love to start a debate on how a SOHC turbo setup like mine would have been making the same HP with way more torque for 1/2 the price...
...but I'll shut up.
</TD></TR></TABLE>yeah, but hp numbers don't always tell the story either. It takes more power turbo to go the same 1/4 mi time as opposed to NA. A 260hp NA motor could propel a light hatch into the 11's, it takes a lot more than that turbo to hit 11's. Why? Maybe the power band is different but it just seems that way.
Nice numbers xrc.
s
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by stevel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yeah, but hp numbers don't always tell the story either. It takes more power turbo to go the same 1/4 mi time as opposed to NA. A 260hp NA motor could propel a light hatch into the 11's, it takes a lot more than that turbo to hit 11's. Why? Maybe the power band is different but it just seems that way.
Nice numbers xrc.
s</TD></TR></TABLE>
um....i dont want to thread jack this guy's thread, but i beg to differ on your point
yeah, but hp numbers don't always tell the story either. It takes more power turbo to go the same 1/4 mi time as opposed to NA. A 260hp NA motor could propel a light hatch into the 11's, it takes a lot more than that turbo to hit 11's. Why? Maybe the power band is different but it just seems that way.
Nice numbers xrc.
s</TD></TR></TABLE>
um....i dont want to thread jack this guy's thread, but i beg to differ on your point
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
couldnt of said it better!! sing it to em preacher !!!!!!!
God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
couldnt of said it better!! sing it to em preacher !!!!!!!
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 0
From: Destroying turbo ITR motors in Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good point, but to each his own I guess.
Nice setup though
God I would love to start a debate on how the all motor car will still in all likelyhood be quicker all around then your boosted single slammer... not to mention that it has a broader powerband and still didn't need any form of forced induction to achieve it... but i'll shut up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good point, but to each his own I guess.
Nice setup though



