New Si springs and New Civic springs??
well going that direction you probably could use Si springs. I apologize, I thought you meant using EM2 springs on a EP3 (which you could also do, however I am seeing the ill effects of that).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jaydub »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well going that direction you probably could use Si springs. I apologize, I thought you meant using EM2 springs on a EP3 (which you could also do, however I am seeing the ill effects of that).
</TD></TR></TABLE>
EM2 Tein S-tech's are even softer than stock EP3 spring rates I'm guessing?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
EM2 Tein S-tech's are even softer than stock EP3 spring rates I'm guessing?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DC5 03 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
EM2 Tein S-tech's are even softer than stock EP3 spring rates I'm guessing?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup.
Stock: 248 front 440 rear
Tein: 157 front 291 rear
EM2 Tein S-tech's are even softer than stock EP3 spring rates I'm guessing?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup.
Stock: 248 front 440 rear
Tein: 157 front 291 rear
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jaydub »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yup.
Stock: 248 front 440 rear
Tein: 157 front 291 rear</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ewwww, that's horrible. I now feel your pain even more. I had no idea they were that much softer. Downgrade
Yup.
Stock: 248 front 440 rear
Tein: 157 front 291 rear</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ewwww, that's horrible. I now feel your pain even more. I had no idea they were that much softer. Downgrade
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Only Em2 on H-Tech »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the springs will work on the Em2 chassis. The rate on the teins are probably due to the obesity of the Ep3..So i think puttin the ep3 springs on a coupe would be a stiffer ride</TD></TR></TABLE>
Spring rate is more complex than just the car's weight. Your car is no lightweight either.
2,579 vs. 2,744
Spring rate is more complex than just the car's weight. Your car is no lightweight either.
2,579 vs. 2,744
lol. i've been using the tanabe df210's meant for the em2 for 8 months. getting bouncy. that's another example why you should think twice about using a part meant for anither car. my o2 cents. leason learned. although for $120 brand new, who could pass that up?
The lengths are different by enough that the drop won't be even. But if you're asking if they'll fit, then yeah, they'll fit. It just doesn't look right.
<---- Learning the lesson right now... EP3 JICs in an EM2, D17 doesn't weigh as much as a K20, front springs too stiff. Oh well, its fixable for pretty cheap.
<---- Learning the lesson right now... EP3 JICs in an EM2, D17 doesn't weigh as much as a K20, front springs too stiff. Oh well, its fixable for pretty cheap.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J.R.
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
Aug 24, 2002 05:20 PM




