Honda S2000 Honda S2000

Dropped s2000 on 18 inch ADR SZI's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #1  
Dr. Pepper's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Palm Coast, FL, USA
Default Dropped s2000 on 18 inch ADR SZI's

Hey guys. I have a '01 s2000. I just put on 18inch ADR SZI's (225/40/18). My questions is how much do you guys think I should drop it. It'd be great if u could post pictures of any of ur cars lowered at all, on whatever size of rims you have. I'd like to check out all your drops. Thanx guys.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 10:43 AM
  #2  
evil vapor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default Re: Dropped s2000 on 18 inch ADR SZI's (Dr. Pepper)

what's the offset and the tire size/brand you are running all around and specs of the wheels? Those will determine if you will rub or not. Are you running 225/40 18s on all four corners?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #3  
Electron Si's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: Dropped s2000 on 18 inch ADR SZI's (vapor)

This kids like my best friend, yes he has 18 all the way around, running 225/40 Toyo Proxy T1S's, and I believe the offset of the rims are 38, or 40.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
SpeedXRacer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Default

Ouch that offset is too low, If you honestly want to lower it than your going to have to adjust the camber ALOT AND roll your fenders in.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #5  
Electron Si's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: (SpeedXRacer)

He's only planning on dropping it around an 1&1/4", so why would his camber be completely fucked? Plus, wouldn't having a 38 or a 40 offset be better than having like a 42? I mean, if he had a 42 offset, wouldn't he have an even greater problem with fender rub?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #6  
munckee's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Electron Si)

"only" 1.25 inches? Thats a pretty decent chunk. 38 offset is really too low for the s2k. I'm honestly surprised that he isn't rubbing already. If he drops, probably even half an inch, he'll likely have rubbing problems.

The higher the offset the better on the s2k (to a point).
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
evil vapor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default Re: (Electron Si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Electron Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He's only planning on dropping it around an 1&1/4", so why would his camber be completely fucked? Plus, wouldn't having a 38 or a 40 offset be better than having like a 42? I mean, if he had a 42 offset, wouldn't he have an even greater problem with fender rub?</TD></TR></TABLE>

camber wont be fubar'd, you'll need to run more negative camber to provide better clearance of the tire and fender liners/fenders. As already mentioned, the higher the offset, the closer the wheel will be towards the hub. What's the width of the wheels?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #8  
Electron Si's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: (munckee)

Yeah, well I'm used to civics where people can drop their cars up to around 2.5" and have no problem, so sorry about the mix up with your oh so wonderful S2000. ******* stupid F series engines!

I believe the rims are around 7.5" wide.

Ha, I love beeing a noobie, but yeah dude, you're pretty cool yourself!


Modified by Electron Si at 12:54 AM 2/24/2004
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
munckee's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Electron Si)

I'm hardly claiming anything about an "oh so great s2000". I simply stated that 1.25 inches is not a minor drop. OTOH I used to have my s2k dropped 2.25".
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #10  
Dr. Pepper's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Palm Coast, FL, USA
Default Re: (munckee)

so what do u think is the safest thing for me to get then? i should have wider wheels in the back then in the front, correct?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:48 PM
  #11  
evil vapor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default Re: (Dr. Pepper)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dr. Pepper &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so what do u think is the safest thing for me to get then? i should have wider wheels in the back then in the front, correct?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

you don't have to have wider wheels in the rear, only retain the same stagger ratio as stock but with wider tires unless you want to have different handling characteristics of the car at the limit.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 03:48 PM
  #12  
evil vapor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default Re: (Electron Si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Electron Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yeah, well I'm used to civics where people can drop their cars up to around 2.5" and have no problem, so sorry about the mix up with your oh so wonderful S2000. ******* stupid F series engines!

I believe the rims are around 7.5" wide.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, enough joking around noobie.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
Dr. Pepper's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Palm Coast, FL, USA
Default Re: (vapor)

well what do you have on ur s2000?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 05:13 PM
  #14  
evil vapor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
From: Laguna
Default Re: (Dr. Pepper)

take the stock tire sizes, calculate the overall diameter of the front and the overall diameter of the rear. Next, calculate the contact patch of the stock front tires and the stock sized rear tires. Now this will give you an idea of what the ratio should be. Go to tire rack where all this info is kept in the tire specs of each tire manufactuer's model and compare till you get what you need.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #15  
SpeedXRacer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Default

As stated above, the reason why he would need to adjust the camber is because the more negative camber you put, the more "tucked" the wheel will be.

I am personally running 18x8 +51 in the front and 18x9 +64 in the back. I honetly dont plan on tracking the car with these rims so my contact patch ratio is quite off.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #16  
Mr. Bagel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Re: (SpeedXRacer)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SpeedXRacer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I am personally running 18x8 +51 in the front and 18x9 +64 in the back. I honetly dont plan on tracking the car with these rims so my contact patch ratio is quite off.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I disagree. I think this is a great setup. Even if it is only 1" and doesn't maintain the same ratio - it is a helluva lot better than 7.5's all the way around.

with the offsets at 38 or 40...eh... rollerskates come to mind.

you really cannot cheap out on aftermarket wheels for this car. if you do, the car will pay in the end when you think it can handle worth a damn.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 07:12 AM
  #17  
SpeedXRacer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Default

Wel I run 265's in the rear with 225 in the front, it throws off the ratio a bit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s2kdavid
Honda S2000
4
Oct 23, 2016 06:16 PM
Ice78transam
Wheel and Tire
1
Aug 30, 2010 02:13 PM
ltran82
Honda S2000
8
Jul 11, 2010 09:06 PM
jodirt
Honda S2000
4
Jul 8, 2007 10:29 PM
Suzukablue
Honda S2000
8
Feb 28, 2007 01:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.