Honda Accord (1990 - 2002) Includes 1997 - 1999 Acura CL

nos, sc, turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 10:11 PM
  #1  
DeregginOut's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Southern California, Ca, USA
Default nos, sc, turbo?

whats safest, most effective, way to increase horsepower? like including most cost effective.. blah blah blah, mr yellow blur says its all relative, but just ur opinions on them.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
ucrave4myrave's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: pittsburg, ca
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (DeregginOut)

cheapest is nos
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2001 | 10:29 PM
  #3  
DeregginOut's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Southern California, Ca, USA
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (ucrave4myrave)

yeah i know. but its bad for ur engine, shouldnt you get cams and pullies or something if get nos for protection.. and that costs a gang.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 01:30 AM
  #4  
Big James's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: nowhere,, Georgia, USA
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (DeregginOut)

Cams and pulleys for nitrous? No, you do not need those. Nitrous is only bad for your motor if abused. Kinda like boost is bad if you turn it up too high. All three will cause wear on your motor though. I would say the safest would be a SC, becuase upping boost is hard to do. Wit
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 10:32 AM
  #5  
SOHCmycord's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Layton/milpitas, Ut/Ca, Davis/Santa Clara
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (DeregginOut)

75 shots is highest amount of shots of nos you normally put in most accords in order be safe. But idunno if they're talking about wet or dry.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 12:13 PM
  #6  
HondaNewbie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Adelphi, MD, USA
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (Wicked_G Accord)

SC is definitely safest form of FI...especially taking into account the long run effects. We basically have the same car...except mine's an auto, I would probably go SC before any of the others....however I heard it's a ******* bitch to put in and tune. So...it seems that turbo again might be the winner (as usual)...and the wear might not matter much since the engine is brand spankin new.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 01:34 PM
  #7  
DeregginOut's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Southern California, Ca, USA
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (Wicked_G Accord)

what does wet or dry stand for.. how much do the kits run, with tuning and everything <-- honda newbie
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 02:38 PM
  #8  
ucrave4myrave's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: pittsburg, ca
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (DeregginOut)

50shot wet setup should be around $450


[Modified by ucrave4myrave, 11:38 PM 10/12/2001]
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2001 | 08:17 PM
  #9  
John's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, NoVA, USA
Default Re: nos, sc, turbo? (ucrave4myrave)

go to http://www.turbomagazine.com and click on the tech article on NOS... good introductory piece... it'll explain the different setups... I've had a dry setup for awhile, but I recommend a wet setup to add a little extra fuel (a little richer of a air fuel mixture is necessary when using NOS)... if you want more info, I can supply that to you (I'm really tired right now)... but I will say one last thing, a wet setup is more reliable and predictable than a dry setup... plus it's more tunable...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The7thG
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
7
Feb 4, 2007 08:05 PM
Chief Brody
Honda Prelude
24
Jul 16, 2003 07:20 PM
Cow
Forced Induction
6
Oct 18, 2002 01:33 AM
degradated
Forced Induction
8
Jan 3, 2002 11:16 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 AM.