yo
it is possible to make a 1.8l V6 engine.i don't know of any in a car,as that would require a pretty small bore/stroke.if you mean Honda specifically,then no,none of their V6s are as small as 1.8l
BTW-the topic title is there for a reason-to describe what the thread is about.
chris
Modified by TeamNextGenChris at 4:17 AM 1/7/2004
BTW-the topic title is there for a reason-to describe what the thread is about.
chris
Modified by TeamNextGenChris at 4:17 AM 1/7/2004
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by The Muffin Man »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Your friend is a moron</TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL yes he is. I hate people who stand by their mis-information.
LOL yes he is. I hate people who stand by their mis-information.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by willyboyD16 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">isn't the v6 mazda mx3 a 1.8 liter v6
I could be wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
no you are not wrong. It is true.
I could be wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
no you are not wrong. It is true.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by matt98hb »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and if you remember right...because of that little powerplant in the mazda..they stopped making it....too many accidents and deaths.....</TD></TR></TABLE>
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18C5-EH2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
makes sense, good theory
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
makes sense, good theory
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by egizzle6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">V6 150hp thats pretty **** numbers. I realize it was a 1.8 but still. What the hell where those other two pistons doing? Have your friend sit on this
cause he's a retard. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.
cause he's a retard. </TD></TR></TABLE>I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by The Muffin Man »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Your friend is a moron</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2slow2curious »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">friend of mine is trying to tell me a 1.8 liter can be a V6 engine plz tell him hes wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're an idiot!
You're an idiot!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkyeC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Uhhh...
Remember it's a MAZDA engine.
If it says Mazda on it and has pistons I'd rather ride a bicycle.
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Uhhh...
Remember it's a MAZDA engine.
If it says Mazda on it and has pistons I'd rather ride a bicycle.
Will everyone seriously shut up... Besides the ppl who have/had something good to say.
I get really sick of these idiotic questions.
Weight, motor efficiency, traction, elevation, driver, etc...
IS DOES NOT matter how much displacement or pistons you have. ****... How my times does myself and other knowledgeable ppl on this board with common sense have to explain this...
Technically B18C5-EH2 on his bike (pedal bike) might be able to beat a Ferrari in the 1/4 mile. Take the facts above, could the motor, driver, etc have an issue? Then the person on the bike could win.
This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe.
I get really sick of these idiotic questions.
Weight, motor efficiency, traction, elevation, driver, etc...
IS DOES NOT matter how much displacement or pistons you have. ****... How my times does myself and other knowledgeable ppl on this board with common sense have to explain this...
Technically B18C5-EH2 on his bike (pedal bike) might be able to beat a Ferrari in the 1/4 mile. Take the facts above, could the motor, driver, etc have an issue? Then the person on the bike could win.
This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 976 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Well how many are there?
Sorry, I just had to buddy.
Well how many are there?
Sorry, I just had to buddy.






