yo
#2
Re: yo (2slow2curious)
Why not? I have a 4 cylinder that's 600cc. I also have a 1 cylinder that's 642cc. The displacement is not necessarily contingent on the number of cylinders.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roanoke A.K.A. Redneckville,VA
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: yo (2slow2curious)
it is possible to make a 1.8l V6 engine.i don't know of any in a car,as that would require a pretty small bore/stroke.if you mean Honda specifically,then no,none of their V6s are as small as 1.8l
BTW-the topic title is there for a reason-to describe what the thread is about.
chris
Modified by TeamNextGenChris at 4:17 AM 1/7/2004
BTW-the topic title is there for a reason-to describe what the thread is about.
chris
Modified by TeamNextGenChris at 4:17 AM 1/7/2004
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: City of Roses, Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: yo (The Muffin Man)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by The Muffin Man »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Your friend is a moron</TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL yes he is. I hate people who stand by their mis-information.
LOL yes he is. I hate people who stand by their mis-information.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The First State
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: yo (willyboyD16)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by willyboyD16 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">isn't the v6 mazda mx3 a 1.8 liter v6
I could be wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
no you are not wrong. It is true.
I could be wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
no you are not wrong. It is true.
#16
Former Moderator
Re: yo (matt98hb)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by matt98hb »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and if you remember right...because of that little powerplant in the mazda..they stopped making it....too many accidents and deaths.....</TD></TR></TABLE>
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cardboard Box, CT, USA
Posts: 4,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: yo (B18C5-EH2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18C5-EH2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
makes sense, good theory
The whole "they don't put the powerful engines in that car because they'd get sued because of all the wrecks and deaths" is pure horseshit IMO.
Motorcycles often have 150hp and only weigh 650lbs. or so and to top it off have half the tire contact patch that a car does - that's shitloads more dangerous than any 150hp V6 2300lb. MX3.
I think it probably had more to do with horrible sales.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
makes sense, good theory
#19
Re: yo (egizzle6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by egizzle6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">V6 150hp thats pretty **** numbers. I realize it was a 1.8 but still. What the hell where those other two pistons doing? Have your friend sit on this cause he's a retard. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: st.louis, mo, usa
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: yo (The Muffin Man)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by The Muffin Man »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Your friend is a moron</TD></TR></TABLE>
#21
New User
Re: yo (2slow2curious)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2slow2curious »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">friend of mine is trying to tell me a 1.8 liter can be a V6 engine plz tell him hes wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
You're an idiot!
You're an idiot!
#22
Former Moderator
Re: yo (SkyeC)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkyeC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Uhhh...
Remember it's a MAZDA engine.
If it says Mazda on it and has pistons I'd rather ride a bicycle.
I bet the motor is smooth as silk and revs "easier" than most anything you'll ever lay your hands on.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Uhhh...
Remember it's a MAZDA engine.
If it says Mazda on it and has pistons I'd rather ride a bicycle.
#24
New User
Re: yo (miksew)
Will everyone seriously shut up... Besides the ppl who have/had something good to say.
I get really sick of these idiotic questions.
Weight, motor efficiency, traction, elevation, driver, etc...
IS DOES NOT matter how much displacement or pistons you have. ****... How my times does myself and other knowledgeable ppl on this board with common sense have to explain this...
Technically B18C5-EH2 on his bike (pedal bike) might be able to beat a Ferrari in the 1/4 mile. Take the facts above, could the motor, driver, etc have an issue? Then the person on the bike could win.
This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe.
I get really sick of these idiotic questions.
Weight, motor efficiency, traction, elevation, driver, etc...
IS DOES NOT matter how much displacement or pistons you have. ****... How my times does myself and other knowledgeable ppl on this board with common sense have to explain this...
Technically B18C5-EH2 on his bike (pedal bike) might be able to beat a Ferrari in the 1/4 mile. Take the facts above, could the motor, driver, etc have an issue? Then the person on the bike could win.
This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe.
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: yo (976)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 976 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This question is more redundant than asking how stars are in the entire universe. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Well how many are there? Sorry, I just had to buddy.
Well how many are there? Sorry, I just had to buddy.