How does my friend's quarter mile time compare to yours?
Here is his set up and times 98 ITR with off brand intake,apex n1 catback,gutted cat, and shitty tires.
First run was
60ft:2.3
1/8:9.79
1/4:14.5 at 96 mph
Second run (adding Jun chipped ecu)
60ft:2.3
1/8:9.72
1/4:14.2 at 98 mph
Does this seem pretty decent? This week he going to get better tire to help with the mad wheel spin and hop. Also he is going to do a long awaited tune up. He is hoping for a 14.0 or maybe 13.9 does it seem out of reach?
First run was
60ft:2.3
1/8:9.79
1/4:14.5 at 96 mph
Second run (adding Jun chipped ecu)
60ft:2.3
1/8:9.72
1/4:14.2 at 98 mph
Does this seem pretty decent? This week he going to get better tire to help with the mad wheel spin and hop. Also he is going to do a long awaited tune up. He is hoping for a 14.0 or maybe 13.9 does it seem out of reach?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Reid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He needs to practice his launch.</TD></TR></TABLE>
He lauched at 5k on the second run and it slightly bogged down. He is just running on really bald tires.
He lauched at 5k on the second run and it slightly bogged down. He is just running on really bald tires.
Sorry to say but that seems very unrealistic.. generic intake , rice canister , and Jun ecu running 14.2? unless maybe hes got a lil something else under the hood
cuz my boys car was one of those Good motors that people get like 2 out of 10? his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice
cuz my boys car was one of those Good motors that people get like 2 out of 10? his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 97itr86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
He lauched at 5k on the second run and it slightly bogged down. He is just running on really bald tires.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Something is terribly wrong with his engine if he launched at 5k rpm on bald tires and bogged.
He lauched at 5k on the second run and it slightly bogged down. He is just running on really bald tires.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Something is terribly wrong with his engine if he launched at 5k rpm on bald tires and bogged.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMx05 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cuz my boys car was one of those Good motors that people get like 2 out of 10?</TD></TR></TABLE>
What are you trying to say?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMx05 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice</TD></TR></TABLE>
His time is decent. It is nothing out of the ordinary. Certainly nothing that would warrant him thinking that his engine is especially strong.
What are you trying to say?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMx05 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice</TD></TR></TABLE>
His time is decent. It is nothing out of the ordinary. Certainly nothing that would warrant him thinking that his engine is especially strong.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Reid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Something is terribly wrong with his engine if he launched at 5k rpm on bald tires and bogged.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It is running very rich on the Jun Ecu for some reason it idles very low as well when you first crank it up. The car acts very strange with this ecu. He did get a better quarter mile time however with it.
Something is terribly wrong with his engine if he launched at 5k rpm on bald tires and bogged.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It is running very rich on the Jun Ecu for some reason it idles very low as well when you first crank it up. The car acts very strange with this ecu. He did get a better quarter mile time however with it.
Trending Topics
im not tryin to say ur boys a liar or nothin just sayin that **** must be gifted , but the ecu problem is most times its like that cuz some times the ecu doesnt have that warm up stage tellin ur car to idle around 1.5 rpms but it does help in the performance range
and to the other ni99a i aint talkin **** if thas what u think
and to the other ni99a i aint talkin **** if thas what u think
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMx05 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sorry to say but that seems very unrealistic.. generic intake , rice canister , and Jun ecu running 14.2? unless maybe hes got a lil something else under the hood
cuz my boys car was one of those Good motors that people get like 2 out of 10? his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice</TD></TR></TABLE>
This car is bonestock besides the mods listed above. How is the N1 catback a rice canister? When he first bought the car with just the intake he ran a 14.3. His car pulls very strong. It actually pulls better then my old R with the milled head and all the bolt ons.
This guy has really good luck with every car he has owned. In his old 00 GSR with just an AEM he ran a 14.6. If you lived in GA I would tell you to come to the track friday and you could see it for yourself.
cuz my boys car was one of those Good motors that people get like 2 out of 10? his set up was AEM cai , Spoon header , comptech b pipe , spoon tb , Skunk Ecu , 9lb flywheel , 6puck clutch kit and ran a 13.9 that seems more realistic... but thats just my advice</TD></TR></TABLE>
This car is bonestock besides the mods listed above. How is the N1 catback a rice canister? When he first bought the car with just the intake he ran a 14.3. His car pulls very strong. It actually pulls better then my old R with the milled head and all the bolt ons.
This guy has really good luck with every car he has owned. In his old 00 GSR with just an AEM he ran a 14.6. If you lived in GA I would tell you to come to the track friday and you could see it for yourself.
its coo bro i believe you lol
but ur right some people do have the best of luck with some cars
just in my opinion i think the n1 is a rice canister
but ur right some people do have the best of luck with some cars
just in my opinion i think the n1 is a rice canister
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ArmyGreen EG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i ran a 14.6 at 96.xxmph completely stock in my 97</TD></TR></TABLE>
He ran 14.3 with just the intake when he first got it.
He ran 14.3 with just the intake when he first got it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Reid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">He needs to practice his launch.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Reid is right 2.3 is pretty bad
Reid is right 2.3 is pretty bad
14.5 at 97 stock intake with jdm dc header, carsound cat, dc catback 200ft above sea level on a 80 degree humid -ss day with a 2.3 60 ft. i know i could of hit a 14.1-14.3 on a cooler day.
E/T's are only half the story...what are all the 60ft's on those runs?
A 2.3 is not a "good" launch, but is average for novice integra drivers. A 2.1 60ft will show a very nice time, could break into the 13's.
A 2.3 is not a "good" launch, but is average for novice integra drivers. A 2.1 60ft will show a very nice time, could break into the 13's.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92TypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">E/T's are only half the story...what are all the 60ft's on those runs?
A 2.3 is not a "good" launch, but is average for novice integra drivers. A 2.1 60ft will show a very nice time, could break into the 13's. </TD></TR></TABLE>
He is a very good driver at this track (Commerce) he always has bad 60ft. times. At Reynolds another local track he usually has 2.0-2.1 60ft times. He is gonna give it a try again this friday with new tires and a tune up. I will let you guys know how it comes out.
A 2.3 is not a "good" launch, but is average for novice integra drivers. A 2.1 60ft will show a very nice time, could break into the 13's. </TD></TR></TABLE>
He is a very good driver at this track (Commerce) he always has bad 60ft. times. At Reynolds another local track he usually has 2.0-2.1 60ft times. He is gonna give it a try again this friday with new tires and a tune up. I will let you guys know how it comes out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
realis9
Acura Integra Type-R
8
Jul 17, 2005 08:33 AM





either then that BONE STOCK! (GSR though) -=P
. I/E stock clutch w/60K. On Azenis....
