3.2 Megapixel camera shots?
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: illinois, United States
Re: 3.2 Megapixel camera shots? (EM2MoNsTeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EM2MoNsTeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyone have 3.2 MP camera shots? If so please post info on camera too, thanks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=660150
Theres the link with a Sony Cybershot 3.2 Megapixel. Not as decent because of image downsizing and the big one = imagestation makes them user friendly and makes it look pixelated.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=660150
Theres the link with a Sony Cybershot 3.2 Megapixel. Not as decent because of image downsizing and the big one = imagestation makes them user friendly and makes it look pixelated.
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 0
From: www.stevedemmitt.com, USA
Re: 3.2 Megapixel camera shots? (EM2MoNsTeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EM2MoNsTeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyone have 3.2 MP camera shots? If so please post info on camera too, thanks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
all the pics I take are from a Sony Mavica CD-300 3.3 Megapixel Camera
you can run a search on my username or view my garage
takes pretty good pics
all the pics I take are from a Sony Mavica CD-300 3.3 Megapixel Camera
you can run a search on my username or view my garage
takes pretty good pics
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 0
From: www.stevedemmitt.com, USA
Re: 3.2 Megapixel camera shots? (rodrez)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">^^ If his pics don't sell you on the 3.2mp, then nothing will. </TD></TR></TABLE>
heh thanks
oh I totally forgot, but my pics are on the h-tphotocrew website
in the gallery under Steve Demmitt
heh thanks
oh I totally forgot, but my pics are on the h-tphotocrew website
in the gallery under Steve Demmitt
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 1
From: Detroit City, MI, Planet Rock
Re: (jonas)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jonas »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">megapixels dont make a clear picture...steadiness does.</TD></TR></TABLE>
w0rd.
w0rd.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Az
all the pics in this thread except the last 4 at the bottom and the rolling pic of my crx were taken with a Sony P-72
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=660229
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=660229
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 0
From: www.stevedemmitt.com, USA
Re: (jonas)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jonas »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">megapixels dont make a clear picture...steadiness does.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah that and the corect focus
of course I guess you could make the argument that an out of focus picture could still be a clear picture if that was your intention
yeah that and the corect focus
of course I guess you could make the argument that an out of focus picture could still be a clear picture if that was your intention
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,394
Likes: 0
From: M_nus Camp
Re: (ITR0863)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ITR0863 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">smallest resolution...680x???? on my a70</TD></TR></TABLE>
Umm 640x480
Umm 640x480
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,685
Likes: 3
From: AZ
Re: (Hella_JDM)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hella_JDM »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
take out the .orig.jpg next time
</TD></TR></TABLE>
take out the .orig.jpg next time
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Billionaire Boys Club, CA
Re: (Chemicalviper)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chemicalviper »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why are you bumping it, we gave you pictures lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
Relax I just wanna be sure before I spend $$$.
Relax I just wanna be sure before I spend $$$.
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: illinois, United States
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 0
From: 626, CA
Re: 3.2 Megapixel camera shots? (EM2MoNsTeR)
thats the camera I used for these shots... I didnt really finetune anything on the camera before taking the pics.
http://exilim.casio.com/z3model.htm
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....DE%3D
no the camera's focus isnt fucked up, my paint is
[img]http://www.we-todd-did-
racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/i=wMTIzNjY5NnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D[img]
All of these pictures were resized from liek 1113xsomething big to 640x480 so there was a slight loss in quality with compression methods used as well. make sure to take that into account when you look at these pics. There are plenty of methods of conversion from the camera to output that can hamper the quality of the pics... the megapixels as stated arent really a big factor in your pictures coming out great unless you are trying to take pictures of ****** bugs and **** at 1280x1024 resolutions....
http://exilim.casio.com/z3model.htm
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....DE%3D
no the camera's focus isnt fucked up, my paint is
[img]http://www.we-todd-did-
racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/i=wMTIzNjY5NnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D[img]
All of these pictures were resized from liek 1113xsomething big to 640x480 so there was a slight loss in quality with compression methods used as well. make sure to take that into account when you look at these pics. There are plenty of methods of conversion from the camera to output that can hamper the quality of the pics... the megapixels as stated arent really a big factor in your pictures coming out great unless you are trying to take pictures of ****** bugs and **** at 1280x1024 resolutions....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post