D16 IM Comparison? Skunk2 vs Edelbrock?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
D16 IM Comparison? Skunk2 vs Edelbrock?
I have a Skunk2 intake manifold that will be on my built motor. I got the Skunk2 because I worked out a deal on it with a friend of mine. I was just curious as to which manifold performs better for FI apps if anyone has tested it. It appears that the edelbrock guys love theirs and it's more popular. from the size of the runners i've seen in pix they seem similar. anyone got insight?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,698
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Re: D16 IM Comparison? Skunk2 vs Edelbrock? (CivicRyda2k)
Might want to check this post.
Spades engine isn't turbo, but I guess the Edelbrock mani works pretty good on his car.
He should have a dyno up soon.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=645494
Spades engine isn't turbo, but I guess the Edelbrock mani works pretty good on his car.
He should have a dyno up soon.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=645494
my Skunk2
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere, USA, USA
Re: D16 IM Comparison? Skunk2 vs Edelbrock? (CivicRyda2k)
I'd say they would produce similiar HP numbers with the only difference being more firewall clearance and the option of running 8 injectors with the Edelbrock.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,187
Likes: 2
From: SoCal, CA, USA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
