My SIR II Dyno in an EF!!!

first gear PULL.
I have stock motor with some no brand short ram intake and 2 1/4 inch piping from muffler tech and some cheap muffler.
second gen b16a OBD1 from Xsi with YS1 tranny and PR3 ECU.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SimbaDogg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey man...those are some pretty weak numbers. is this the jdm sir II motor, the 170 hp variant? did you do compression/leakdown tests?</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol weak I think you need to think again!!!
thats not weak numbers tust me people that dyno b16a all day said its healthy strong *** motor
lol weak I think you need to think again!!!
thats not weak numbers tust me people that dyno b16a all day said its healthy strong *** motor
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SimbaDogg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">trust me, i've seen usdm b16's (160 hp) and jdm 1st gens the same amount of power at the wheels. even with a crappy intake and muffler, i'd expect more than that. </TD></TR></TABLE>
LOL. sorry but I don't believe that proof it with a dyno graph.
If you have a regular b16a OBD0 and doing 160HP you must have some after market stuff like valve springs etc..even with CTR cams u dont do that much on the regular B16a.
LOL. sorry but I don't believe that proof it with a dyno graph.
If you have a regular b16a OBD0 and doing 160HP you must have some after market stuff like valve springs etc..even with CTR cams u dont do that much on the regular B16a.
thats me w/ an aem shorty...is that proof enough? the same day, about 4 different obd 2 b16s (2 99-00 si coupes close to stock) were making 140-145 hp, a struggling itr made 158, and an h22 made 165
now why would i lie? look @ my sig
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr Milano »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's a normal B16A. Wake up man.
Why the 1st gear pull?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, I was wondering the same thing. Aren't dyno runs usually done in either 3rd or 4th gear? Wouldn't 1st gear give you slightly innaccurate numbers? Then again, I could just be talking out of my ***....it is 2:30am...
Why the 1st gear pull?
</TD></TR></TABLE>yeah, I was wondering the same thing. Aren't dyno runs usually done in either 3rd or 4th gear? Wouldn't 1st gear give you slightly innaccurate numbers? Then again, I could just be talking out of my ***....it is 2:30am...
Why waste a dyno pull in 1st gear..the results won't even be close to accurate... Dyno in 4th gear in any b-series cause its more of a 1:1 ratio.
If those #'s were measured in 1st gear then they will not be accurate. Dyno runs should be done in 4th gear and begin at around 2500rpm most of the time, this is due to the closer to 1-1 ratio so you can accuratly read the HP and TQ.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by King Tut33 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's gotsta be a typo. He probably meant "first dyno pull".</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea what he said. people have told me I can gain some HP and TQ with a VAFC.. how much anyone have any ideas?
yea what he said. people have told me I can gain some HP and TQ with a VAFC.. how much anyone have any ideas?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bossman032 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yea what he said. people have told me I can gain some HP and TQ with a VAFC.. how much anyone have any ideas?</TD></TR></TABLE>
so what gear did you use?
and id hit up all the bolt ons first and then worry about engine management and tuning
yea what he said. people have told me I can gain some HP and TQ with a VAFC.. how much anyone have any ideas?</TD></TR></TABLE>
so what gear did you use?
and id hit up all the bolt ons first and then worry about engine management and tuning
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



.
