i ran across this nice link that has a very complete listing of 1/4 mile times for cars in their stock form. i think it is a nice reference: http://www.japandomesticmotor.....html

i also brought those numbers into a spreadsheet and made a graph to give you some idea of how you are driving. for example, if you have a trap of 100mph and your ET was 14.3, you know that you're making the power and with practice should be able to get closer to 13.9. of course these are all estimates, but i thought it was a nice reference for the n00bs to dragging like myself.



comments welcome

 

So what does it mean if you run faster then the trap speed says you should? Check my sig for the CRX.

 

seems accurate at some points while others are way off

 

drivetrain can change that quite a bit (ie: awd/rwd/fwd)

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by keebler65 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">of course these are all estimates, but i thought it was a nice reference for the n00bs to dragging like myself.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

it's not too bad of a measurement. I run 98mph traps and hitting 14.5s. The graph is telling me I should be in the low 14s.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Honda Sport &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's not too bad of a measurement. I run 98mph traps and hitting 14.5s. The graph is telling me I should be in the low 14s. </TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah and look at your 60ft: 2.3s. that means it would put you in the estimated area if you got it down to 2.0. thats how mine was too

 

with 98mph you should be in the high 13s

 

Damn.... I ran it at 14.56@101.83... I should be getting 13's I think.... but I know it's all because of my 60ft... 2.5's..... &lt;----- Sorry as hell I know... Later Mike

 

I find it kinda funny that the majority of the graph is 14+

gotta love our Hon-duhs