JG to Skunk 2 drops times
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Lake Cormorant, Ms, USA
JG to Skunk 2 drops times
Okay, I wanted the skunk2 but running out of time I had to get the JG with that said the motor is a b18c1 with 4into1 dc header, crap exhaust, skunk2 manifold, type r cams, ITR CAI .... Also note this motor is in a Dx 92 that weights 2250
With the JG the time was
R/T .236
60ft 2.255
330 6.323
1/8th 9.618
mph 73.74
1000ft 12.453
1/4 14.854
mph 94.08
time with the skunk2 manifold
R/T .173
60ft 2.206
330 6.048
1/8th 9.220
mph 77.08
1000ft 11.948
1/4 14.284
mph 95.62
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
With the JG the time was
R/T .236
60ft 2.255
330 6.323
1/8th 9.618
mph 73.74
1000ft 12.453
1/4 14.854
mph 94.08
time with the skunk2 manifold
R/T .173
60ft 2.206
330 6.048
1/8th 9.220
mph 77.08
1000ft 11.948
1/4 14.284
mph 95.62
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Lake Cormorant, Ms, USA
The last time I ran the 14.8 was september or july kinda kewl but still humid... IN memphis the humidity is bad.... Last night it was pretty chilly got a 95.62 ....
Also I ran a 14.3 at 92mph that was my first run.. .SO who knows.
Also I ran a 14.3 at 92mph that was my first run.. .SO who knows.
Future Texas Boy
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,067
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Redneck
Re: JG to Skunk 2 drops times (ReallySlowEg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ReallySlowEg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol. Excellent data. Thanks. We all know there are absolutely no variables when it comes to drag racing.
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol. Excellent data. Thanks. We all know there are absolutely no variables when it comes to drag racing.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: Chester, MD
Re: (jinxproof99)
I was only messing with you man 
But yeah the JG has a big *** plenum and it takes a lot of air to push in there in order to take advantage of something like it. The skunk2, from what I understand, is kinda like the type R IM where it just flows alot better at mid to high range RPM. Do you have any future plans for the car?
Welcome to the board and have fun.
But yeah the JG has a big *** plenum and it takes a lot of air to push in there in order to take advantage of something like it. The skunk2, from what I understand, is kinda like the type R IM where it just flows alot better at mid to high range RPM. Do you have any future plans for the car?Welcome to the board and have fun.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: JG to Skunk 2 drops times (TheSicillian)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheSicillian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JG=Just Garbage
...aight ???
</TD></TR></TABLE>
JG no longer has a hand in the manifold, as they hardly ever did. it's a pure Edelbrock piece now.
and it's a DAMN good manifold for the money too. RLZ made good power all motor with theirs. And in turbo situations, it's a great piece to have.
...aight ???
</TD></TR></TABLE>
JG no longer has a hand in the manifold, as they hardly ever did. it's a pure Edelbrock piece now.
and it's a DAMN good manifold for the money too. RLZ made good power all motor with theirs. And in turbo situations, it's a great piece to have.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
i have the edelbrock manifold on my type-r and i just made 205.4hp on the stock bottomend with more if i could have revved higher oh yeah and the head isnt even ported so technically everything is a bolt on matter fact i have that
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Sicilly, Italia
Re: JG to Skunk 2 drops times (GSRswapandslow)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRswapandslow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
JG no longer has a hand in the manifold, as they hardly ever did. it's a pure Edelbrock piece now.
and it's a DAMN good manifold for the money too. RLZ made good power all motor with theirs. And in turbo situations, it's a great piece to have.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes ,thats not JG but JG-Edelbrock ....
how about this ?? -- > http://jgenginedynamics.com/In...eries
They cut type-r runner and then straps on a custom plenum on it...
JG no longer has a hand in the manifold, as they hardly ever did. it's a pure Edelbrock piece now.
and it's a DAMN good manifold for the money too. RLZ made good power all motor with theirs. And in turbo situations, it's a great piece to have.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes ,thats not JG but JG-Edelbrock ....
how about this ?? -- > http://jgenginedynamics.com/In...eries
They cut type-r runner and then straps on a custom plenum on it...
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,606
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Re: JG to Skunk 2 drops times (TheSicillian)
the Edelbrock intake manifold probably didnt provide enough backpressure for the motor so you ended up losing power while the smaller designed skunk2 did and gave you torque and power... economic way of thinking when dealing with motors... an equilibrium between supply and demand
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Re: JG to Skunk 2 drops times (ReallySlowEg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ReallySlowEg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Okay, I wanted the skunk2 but running out of time I had to get the JG with that said the motor is a b18c1 with 4into1 dc header, crap exhaust, skunk2 manifold, type r cams, ITR CAI .... Also note this motor is in a Dx 92 that weights 2250
With the JG the time was
R/T .236
60ft 2.255
330 6.323
1/8th 9.618
mph 73.74
1000ft 12.453
1/4 14.854
mph 94.08
time with the skunk2 manifold
R/T .173
60ft 2.206
330 6.048
1/8th 9.220
mph 77.08
1000ft 11.948
1/4 14.284
mph 95.62
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well thats a really bad comparison because on the 14.85 it looks like you missed 2nd gear or something happened... because there is no way you lost .3 by the 330ft and .4 by the 1/8th with similar 60fts... and then you went from 74mph to 94mph - 20mph in crease... but 77 to 95 18mph increase...
Not saying that the JG is better then the Skunk... just saying that your comparision isn't fair
With the JG the time was
R/T .236
60ft 2.255
330 6.323
1/8th 9.618
mph 73.74
1000ft 12.453
1/4 14.854
mph 94.08
time with the skunk2 manifold
R/T .173
60ft 2.206
330 6.048
1/8th 9.220
mph 77.08
1000ft 11.948
1/4 14.284
mph 95.62
As you can see the skunk2 is better for a stock motor with just bolt ons... Should be faster but I can't drive so i'll live with it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well thats a really bad comparison because on the 14.85 it looks like you missed 2nd gear or something happened... because there is no way you lost .3 by the 330ft and .4 by the 1/8th with similar 60fts... and then you went from 74mph to 94mph - 20mph in crease... but 77 to 95 18mph increase...
Not saying that the JG is better then the Skunk... just saying that your comparision isn't fair
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post