AEM Cold Air Intake V2 for GSR
Yeah I checked out their website and says something about the v2 having larger piping that creates more of a vacuum effect = sucks more air.
Just wondering if that holds true and if anyone has experience with it. Thanks.
Just wondering if that holds true and if anyone has experience with it. Thanks.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,989
Likes: 1
From: World Domination, United States
i would just get the one that has the most bang for the buck. the old system is prolly cheaper now since they came out with the v2. you should also look into the injen system which can be made into ram air or cold air for those rainy days or what not.
the only thing i can tell is that the v2 does seem to have a slight deeper tone to it than the original cai. i got mine for free, but if i were in the market for a new cai, as you are, i'd just stick with the original cai if i were you.
with the v2, you've got to move over the AC lines with a bracket that aem provides, and also replace your stock tranny mount bracket with a thinner one which aem also provides
with the v2, you've got to move over the AC lines with a bracket that aem provides, and also replace your stock tranny mount bracket with a thinner one which aem also provides
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,616
Likes: 1
From: Left Coast : High Altitude, Top Floor
Stick with the Old School AEM CAI. I dont think the V2 will give you much more than the old ones...plus, like everyone is saying, the old school ones will be cheaper. V2 CAI seems more like a marketing scheme.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EnjoyTheRideDC2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Stick with the Old School AEM CAI. I dont think the V2 will give you much more than the old ones...plus, like everyone is saying, the old school ones will be cheaper. V2 CAI seems more like a marketing scheme.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I understand AEM's theory, it should produce slightly more power. But as mentioned... the older one will be cheaper now and still makes good power.
I understand AEM's theory, it should produce slightly more power. But as mentioned... the older one will be cheaper now and still makes good power.
Trending Topics
plus the reg. cai is louder...i'm not sure what your preference is, but i like louder 
btw...the v2 is a v2...not a CAI...(it's a new category of intake according to AEM tech support)

btw...the v2 is a v2...not a CAI...(it's a new category of intake according to AEM tech support)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmintegra1994 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">plus the reg. cai is louder...i'm not sure what your preference is, but i like louder 
btw...the v2 is a v2...not a CAI...(it's a new category of intake according to AEM tech support)</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought the v2 is louder that the reg cai? Thanks for all the feedback guys!

btw...the v2 is a v2...not a CAI...(it's a new category of intake according to AEM tech support)</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought the v2 is louder that the reg cai? Thanks for all the feedback guys!
i went to get a price for the v2 for the type r and the place i went top dodnt have it in stock. so they called aem up and they said they iscontinued to make em beause they found it didnt give any more power then the regular aem cai. but that is for the type r i donno bought the gsr.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




