who would win? and what are the specs on 91 Q45. He claims he killed a 95ish Mustang GT. Should I race him or will he pull on me hard?

 

I posted this before it got deleted....who knows why.

4.5L V8
340 hp @6400 RPM
333 lb-ft @ 4000 RPM
5 speed automatic
Curb Weight: 3,801 lbs

 

Is that a 1991 Q45 or newer one? With that weight what does a 91 Q45 1/4 mile look like?

 

sorry, that was for the new one..

91 weighed more - 3950 lbs, 4,082 lbs w/active suspension, and less horsepower
the 91 Q45 does the 1/4 mile in about 15.6 secs...

 

A moderator is deleting these posts.. But he doesnt say who he is.. Just like a ***** to do something like that..

 

thanks thats great news

 

Not to condone the language but it is considered good practice to lock the thread and state who did it so if the member has a problem they can discuss it with the moderator. If it really needed to be deleted that is no sweat but try emailing or even IM'ing the member to let them know. Keeps posts like this out fo the forum.

 

Ummm, no... it's under 300 hp & ft-lbs... unless you have dyno specs. The Japanese will NEVER publish ANYTHING over 300... BIG TAXES! Furthermore, from `90+ it's only been a 4-speed auto, not a 5. Where do you guys get your info? It's very simple, carpoint.com... check it!

 

I don't see anything wrong with my post. I mean it does involve a Type R, and I'm a type R owner on a Type R forum so what's the problem.

 

Moderators are basically cracking down on OT and kill type threads. I plan to move all these threads if they do not belong here. I'm tired of hearing how much better the other forums are due mostly to less OT type posts. But yes alot of the mods are now deleting them..due to the fact there tired of all the OT items in the R forum.

 

I dont want to take sides, but i have to agree with the mods on this one, the OT Posts have gotten a little out of hand, But I can't see a reason to delete them Just Move them to the proper forum.

 

Lets refrain from using racial slurs(even unintended ones).

I think he was quoting specs from the NEW Q. That thing has some power.
Too bad the less powerful LS430 still kicked its ***. Must be that "better than
sports car" drag coefficient its got.

 

Hey Sorry this Topic is really old but juss lookin up for what people had to say about the Q. Well I know this guy down the street with 91 Q45 with I/E and My friend drives a 99 ITR with i/h/e/Vtec cont./ Falkens Juss some basic work. They Both are really good drivers. The ITR kept talking trash on the " Old mans car " so they took it to a open street. Here's thre results :

ITR Vs. Q

1st. Run= ITR had a Bad Launch Q Took It

2nd The Q Had Mis-shifted into 2nd to Timing was off lost by 2.5 cars.

3rd Run = It was a relly god Run.. ITR Pulled in 1st and the Q had a okay take off for an automatic but when it got into 2nd.. The q pulled in front of the ITR. I the the ITR was at lease near the end of 2nd.

There's no point of me telling you guys all this is juss peeps need some ^--- Lame story with not full details to read about. Also to the peeps who think they know about Q's. Don't read what people tell you. The 1st Gen Q's Run 15.1 If taking off in 1st. 90-93 Q's Had a problem when the Tranny chip( when lefted in D= DRive) whould take off in 2nd then down shift into 1st from a stop. If a Q driver knows he'd drive the Q like a Stick with no Clutch. BTW The Guy down the street with I/E Claims to run mid 14's proven when racing the ITR .

 

street racing is illeagal and has no place in here.. thanks..

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .Unknown. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hey Sorry this Topic is really old but juss lookin up for what people had to say about the Q. Well I know this guy down the street with 91 Q45 with I/E and My friend drives a 99 ITR with i/h/e/Vtec cont./ Falkens Juss some basic work. They Both are really good drivers. The ITR kept talking trash on the " Old mans car " so they took it to a open street. Here's thre results :

ITR Vs. Q

1st. Run= ITR had a Bad Launch Q Took It

2nd The Q Had Mis-shifted into 2nd to Timing was off lost by 2.5 cars.

3rd Run = It was a relly god Run.. ITR Pulled in 1st and the Q had a okay take off for an automatic but when it got into 2nd.. The q pulled in front of the ITR. I the the ITR was at lease near the end of 2nd.

There's no point of me telling you guys all this is juss peeps need some ^--- Lame story with not full details to read about. Also to the peeps who think they know about Q's. Don't read what people tell you. The 1st Gen Q's Run 15.1 If taking off in 1st. 90-93 Q's Had a problem when the Tranny chip( when lefted in D= DRive) whould take off in 2nd then down shift into 1st from a stop. If a Q driver knows he'd drive the Q like a Stick with no Clutch. BTW The Guy down the street with I/E Claims to run mid 14's proven when racing the ITR .</TD></TR></TABLE>

Wow, I'm glad you read all the posts about how this is unaccetable on this board.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, I'm glad you read all the posts about how this is unaccetable on this board.</TD></TR></TABLE>

And bringing back a thread that's ... oh 3 years old?

 

&lt;---Shakes head and wonders what H-T "was like" before most people who joined in 03' and 04' were around