Skunk2 manifold versus JG/Edelbrock, which one is better?
Thread Starter
the son and the heir
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,698
Likes: 0
From: dreaming of the Gulf Coast, USA
Skunk2 manifold versus JG/Edelbrock, which one is better?
Since these two manifolds are basically the same price, which one is the better performance mod? I want numbers, horsepower, torque or flow characteristics. This is for a normally aspirated GSR. Anyone out there have any information with noting? Thanks all.
New User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: USA
Re: Skunk2 manifold versus JG/Edelbrock, which one is better? (macrosshn)
I'd go Skunk2 manifold. I actually was talking about this with importbuilder's mechanic and he recommended the skunk for n/a and jg for f/i.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: tampa, florida, usa
Re: Skunk2 manifold versus JG/Edelbrock, which one is better? (RK)
for NA, skunk2 is better for most people (afterall, it was designed after the type-r IM, and most ITR owners dont upgrade their IM). the JG is better for FI or for extreme NA. i think i read somewhere that the JG manifold makes power from like 7-11k rpms.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brandeezy1
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
16
Jul 9, 2012 06:28 PM
RayB
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
Jan 23, 2004 10:26 AM
